Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Jurnal Hukum Sehasen
Diati, Ranisa
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencurian oleh Anak di Indonesia dan Singapura Diati, Ranisa; Simatupang, Efika Weny Meida; Winanti, Atik
Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Vol 9, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jim.v9i4.2025.2383-2394

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perbandingan pengaturan dan penegakan hukum tindak pidana pencurian oleh anak di Indonesia dan Singapura sebagai dua negara dengan sistem hukum berbeda yang sama-sama meratifikasi Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. Data Pusiknas Bareskrim Polri menunjukkan 17.241 laporan pencurian dengan 437 terlapor anak dalam periode Januari-Februari 2025, sementara di Singapura terjadi peningkatan 41,1% kasus pencurian toko oleh remaja pada 2025. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif, menganalisis UU SPPA Indonesia dan CYPA Singapura, putusan pengadilan, serta data sekunder dari lembaga resmi. Temuan menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan, Indonesia dengan sistem civil law mengadopsi diversi wajib namun tingkat keberhasilannya rendah karena aparat penegak hukum yang terjebak pada prosedur formal dan keterbatasan infrastruktur, sedangkan Singapura dengan sistem common law mencapai kerberhasilan melalui probation order yang didukung pre-sentence report komprehensif dan kolaborasi antar lembaga. Putusan PN Bekasi No. 43/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN.Bks membuktikan kesenjangan norma dan praktik di Indonesia, di mana pemaafan korban tidak menghentikan proses pidana. Penelitian merekomendasikan peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, pengembangan infrastruktur LPAS/LPKA, sistem monitoring dan evaluasi diversi, adopsi mekanisme pre-sentence report, serta program rehabilitasi variatif untuk menjembatani kesenjangan antara idealisme restorative justice dengan realitas implementasi sistem peradilan pidana anak Indonesia.
Asset Recovery Mechanism for Victims of Illegal Investment Fraud : “A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Malaysian Law (Analysis of the Binomo Case Decision) Simatupang, Efika Weny Meida; Diati, Ranisa; Wahyudi, Slamet Tri; Supardi, Supardi
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 12 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v12i2.10996

Abstract

Illegal investment fraud through binary option platforms such as Binomo has caused massive financial losses to thousands of victims in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the asset recovery mechanism for victims of illegal investment fraud within the Indonesian legal system based on an analysis of the Binomo case verdict, and to compare it with the asset recovery mechanism under Malaysian law. This research employs a normative legal research method with statutory, case-based, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesian law has provided asset recovery mechanisms through restitution, joinder of compensation claims in criminal proceedings, and asset forfeiture under the Anti-Money Laundering Law; however, their implementation remains inconsistent, as reflected in the Binomo case rulings. In contrast, Malaysia through AMLATFPUAA 2001 offers a more comprehensive framework, including civil forfeiture without requiring full criminal conviction. This study recommends the adoption of a non-conviction based forfeiture mechanism and the establishment of a dedicated asset management institution in Indonesia as a strategic step toward legal reform.
Co-Authors Atik Winanti Simatupang, Efika Weny Meida Slamet Tri Wahyudi Supardi Supardi