Sjafei .
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Development of fowl cholera vaccine: I. Protection of Pasteurella multocida local isolate vaccine against challenge of homologous and heterologous strains. ., Supar; Setiadi, Yudi; ., Djaenuri; Kurniasih, Nina; Poerwadhikarta, Bhakti; ., Sjafei
Indonesian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 6, No 1 (2001)
Publisher : Indonesian Animal Sciences Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (153.899 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/jitv.v6i1.220

Abstract

Pasteurella multocida locally isolated from chicken and ducks (BCC 299, BCC 2331, DY1, DY2, 12TG, 15TG) andimported strains (BCC 1359, 1362; HEDDLESTON group 1 and 6 respectively) had been tested for its pathogenicity in theprevious study. The aims of this experiment were to study the preparation of local isolate pasteurellosis vaccines and to determine the protective effect of that vaccines in chicken against the highly pathogenic local isolates of P. multocida. Killed monovalent, bivalent and polyvalent pasteurellosis vaccines were prepared and each was adjunvanted with aluminum hydroxide gel at a final concentration of 1.5% and the cell concentration was equal to the No 10 of MacFarland tube standard. Each of the vaccine prepared was used to vaccinated on a group of six week old of layer chicken (8 per group). Each chicken was subcutaneously injected with 0.2 ml of vaccine, four weeks later each was boostered with similar vaccine with the same dose. Two weeks after giving the boostered vaccine each group of chicken were challenged, half with life bacterium of P. Multocida BCC 2331 and other with DY2. Any chick which survive after challenge was designated as protected by vaccination. Before vaccination 1 ml of blood was drawn from each of chicken and then two weeks apart up to challenge. Serum from each sample was separated and kept in deep freeze until tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Chicken vaccinated with killed whole cell P. multocida vaccines of monovalent (BCC 2331 or DY2) and bivalent (BCC 2331 + DY2) were protected against challenge with live bacterium of either BCC 2331 or DY2 at rate 67-100%. There was no protection in chicken vaccinated with either BCC 299, DY1, 12TG, 15TG, BCC 1359, or 1362 killed vaccine. Similarly no protection of chicken vaccinated with either DY1 + BCC299, 12TG + 15TG or BCC 1359 + BCC 1362 bivalent vaccines. The protection rate of the polyvalent local isolate vaccine was at average 50-75%. All vaccinated chicken showed the presence of antibody responses againsted the extract cell and whole cell antigens of either P. multocida BCC 2331 or DY2 local isolate as detected by ELISA. The antibody responses from vaccinated chicken against extra cellular antigens prepared from broth cultures of BCC 2331 and DY2 were detected only from vaccinated chicken with vaccine containing killed antigen of BCC 2331 and/or DY2 isolate. It is likely, the local isolate of P. multocida BCC 2331 and DY2 would be benefit for producing inactive fowl cholera vaccine use in Indonesia, but the protective antigen that enhances immune protection should be determined by means of immunoblotting techniques.   Key words: Pasteurella multocida, fowl cholera, vaccine, protection
The development of fowl cholera vaccine: II. Pathogenicity and vaccine protection of Pasteurella multocida local isolates in experimental ducks ., Supar; Setiadi, Yudi; ., Djaenuri; Kurniasih, Nina; Poerwadhikarta, B; ., Sjafei
Indonesian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Vol 6, No 2 (2001)
Publisher : Indonesian Animal Sciences Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (141.931 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/jitv.v6i2.228

Abstract

Pasteurellosis or fowl cholera in ducks occurs sporadically along the year in many high duck population areas of Java and other parts of Indonesia. Some isolates of Pasteurella multocida from ducks and chicken are kept at the BALITVET culture collection. The aims of this research were to evaluate the pathogenicity of local isolates and imported strains of P. multocida and to study the pasteurellosis local isolate vaccine and protection assay in ducks. Two imported strains of P. multocida (BCC 1359, BCC 1362) and 6 local isolates (BCC 299, BCC 2331, DY1, DY2, 12TG, 15TG) were used in this study. In the pathogenicity assays the imported strains and local isolates were activated in mice and in duct and then in brain hearth infusion broth containing 5% normal sheep serum. Each of broth culture was diluted, each dilution (102 and 104) of strains or isolates was injected intraperitoneally into a group of normal ducks. Antigen for vaccine, each was produced in sheep blood (5%) agar. Cells were harvested and killed with 0.1% formalin. Monovalent, bivalent, and polyvalent vaccines were prepared, at concentration equal to the Macfarland standard tube No 10, and each was adjuvanted with alhydrogel at final concentration of 1.5%. Each vaccine type was injected into a group of 10 week old ducks (8 animals per group), with 0.2 ml/injection. Four weeks later each animal in group were boostered with the same vaccine, dose, route as the previous injection. Before vaccination each animal was bleed through wing vena, then every two weeks, serum was collected and stored at -20oC. Two weeks after boostered, three days after the last blood sample collection, half animal of each group were challenged intraperitonelly with the BCC 2331 and half with DY2 live broth culture. The pathogenicity assays showed the only BCC 2331 and DY2 killed the experimental ducks, the other did not. The animals vaccinated with either BCC 2331,  DY2 or bivalent (BCC 2331+DY2) vaccines were protected with either life bacterial challenged of either BCC 2331 or DY2 local isolates. It is likely, P. multocida BCC 2331 and DY2 isolates can be used for pasteurellosis candidate vaccine used in Indonesia, but it still needs more studies in the immunological of protective antigens.   Key words: Pasteurella multocida, fowl cholera, ducks, vaccine, protection
The development of fowl cholera vaccine: II. Pathogenicity and vaccine protection of Pasteurella multocida local isolates in experimental ducks Supar .; Yudi Setiadi; Djaenuri .; Nina Kurniasih; B Poerwadhikarta; Sjafei .
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner Vol 6, No 2 (2001): JUNE 2001
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Animal Research and Development (ICARD)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (141.931 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/jitv.v6i2.228

Abstract

Pasteurellosis or fowl cholera in ducks occurs sporadically along the year in many high duck population areas of Java and other parts of Indonesia. Some isolates of Pasteurella multocida from ducks and chicken are kept at the BALITVET culture collection. The aims of this research were to evaluate the pathogenicity of local isolates and imported strains of P. multocida and to study the pasteurellosis local isolate vaccine and protection assay in ducks. Two imported strains of P. multocida (BCC 1359, BCC 1362) and 6 local isolates (BCC 299, BCC 2331, DY1, DY2, 12TG, 15TG) were used in this study. In the pathogenicity assays the imported strains and local isolates were activated in mice and in duct and then in brain hearth infusion broth containing 5% normal sheep serum. Each of broth culture was diluted, each dilution (102 and 104) of strains or isolates was injected intraperitoneally into a group of normal ducks. Antigen for vaccine, each was produced in sheep blood (5%) agar. Cells were harvested and killed with 0.1% formalin. Monovalent, bivalent, and polyvalent vaccines were prepared, at concentration equal to the Macfarland standard tube No 10, and each was adjuvanted with alhydrogel at final concentration of 1.5%. Each vaccine type was injected into a group of 10 week old ducks (8 animals per group), with 0.2 ml/injection. Four weeks later each animal in group were boostered with the same vaccine, dose, route as the previous injection. Before vaccination each animal was bleed through wing vena, then every two weeks, serum was collected and stored at -20oC. Two weeks after boostered, three days after the last blood sample collection, half animal of each group were challenged intraperitonelly with the BCC 2331 and half with DY2 live broth culture. The pathogenicity assays showed the only BCC 2331 and DY2 killed the experimental ducks, the other did not. The animals vaccinated with either BCC 2331,  DY2 or bivalent (BCC 2331+DY2) vaccines were protected with either life bacterial challenged of either BCC 2331 or DY2 local isolates. It is likely, P. multocida BCC 2331 and DY2 isolates can be used for pasteurellosis candidate vaccine used in Indonesia, but it still needs more studies in the immunological of protective antigens.   Key words: Pasteurella multocida, fowl cholera, ducks, vaccine, protection
Development of fowl cholera vaccine: I. Protection of Pasteurella multocida local isolate vaccine against challenge of homologous and heterologous strains. Supar .; Yudi Setiadi; Djaenuri .; Nina Kurniasih; Bhakti Poerwadhikarta; Sjafei .
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner Vol 6, No 1 (2001): MARCH 2001
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Animal Research and Development (ICARD)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (153.899 KB) | DOI: 10.14334/jitv.v6i1.220

Abstract

Pasteurella multocida locally isolated from chicken and ducks (BCC 299, BCC 2331, DY1, DY2, 12TG, 15TG) andimported strains (BCC 1359, 1362; HEDDLESTON group 1 and 6 respectively) had been tested for its pathogenicity in theprevious study. The aims of this experiment were to study the preparation of local isolate pasteurellosis vaccines and to determine the protective effect of that vaccines in chicken against the highly pathogenic local isolates of P. multocida. Killed monovalent, bivalent and polyvalent pasteurellosis vaccines were prepared and each was adjunvanted with aluminum hydroxide gel at a final concentration of 1.5% and the cell concentration was equal to the No 10 of MacFarland tube standard. Each of the vaccine prepared was used to vaccinated on a group of six week old of layer chicken (8 per group). Each chicken was subcutaneously injected with 0.2 ml of vaccine, four weeks later each was boostered with similar vaccine with the same dose. Two weeks after giving the boostered vaccine each group of chicken were challenged, half with life bacterium of P. Multocida BCC 2331 and other with DY2. Any chick which survive after challenge was designated as protected by vaccination. Before vaccination 1 ml of blood was drawn from each of chicken and then two weeks apart up to challenge. Serum from each sample was separated and kept in deep freeze until tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Chicken vaccinated with killed whole cell P. multocida vaccines of monovalent (BCC 2331 or DY2) and bivalent (BCC 2331 + DY2) were protected against challenge with live bacterium of either BCC 2331 or DY2 at rate 67-100%. There was no protection in chicken vaccinated with either BCC 299, DY1, 12TG, 15TG, BCC 1359, or 1362 killed vaccine. Similarly no protection of chicken vaccinated with either DY1 + BCC299, 12TG + 15TG or BCC 1359 + BCC 1362 bivalent vaccines. The protection rate of the polyvalent local isolate vaccine was at average 50-75%. All vaccinated chicken showed the presence of antibody responses againsted the extract cell and whole cell antigens of either P. multocida BCC 2331 or DY2 local isolate as detected by ELISA. The antibody responses from vaccinated chicken against extra cellular antigens prepared from broth cultures of BCC 2331 and DY2 were detected only from vaccinated chicken with vaccine containing killed antigen of BCC 2331 and/or DY2 isolate. It is likely, the local isolate of P. multocida BCC 2331 and DY2 would be benefit for producing inactive fowl cholera vaccine use in Indonesia, but the protective antigen that enhances immune protection should be determined by means of immunoblotting techniques.   Key words: Pasteurella multocida, fowl cholera, vaccine, protection