Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

EVALUASI PROGRAM KARTU JAKARTA PINTAR (KJP) PLUS DI SEKOLAH DASAR KECAMATAN MAKASAR JAKARTA TIMUR andri wijaya; Abdul Rahman A. Ghani; Sri Yuliawati
Jurnal Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka bekerjasama dengan Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI).

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/jppp.v5i1.11524

Abstract

In general, this thesis aims to obtain information about the KJP Plus program at the Makassar District Elementary School, East Jakarta. This evaluation uses the CIPP model approach (Context, Input, Process, and Product). Data collection techniques through documentation studies, and questionnaires. The data analysis technique in this evaluation method uses a quantitative-descriptive approach with stages consisting of: data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the evaluation concluded that: (1). The context of the implementation of the KJP Plus program at the Makassar District Elementary School, East Jakarta is in accordance with the applicable provisions in the KJP Plus program. (2) The input from the implementation of the KJP Plus program is appropriate in supporting the success of the KJP plus program at the Makassar District Elementary School, East Jakarta. (3) The implementation of the KJP Plus program at the Makassar District Elementary School, East Jakarta has been going well, but there needs to be improvements in the aspect of reporting the use of KJP plus funds. (4) The achievement of the implementation of the KJP Plus program at the Makassar District Elementary School, East Jakarta during the COVID-19 pandemic was not yet optimal, especially in meeting the needs of students, especially in supporting educational needs
Teacher's Understanding of Minimum Competence Assessment and Its Impact on Assessment Conducted in Class Ernawati, Ernawati; A. Ghani, Abdul Rahman; Trisnawati, Ratna Dwi; Malik, Zein Abdulloh
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 12 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v12i1.66041

Abstract

Misconceptions in assessment can lead to low quality of education. Previous research revealed that the misconceptions experienced by teachers, schools and parents in implementing the National Assessment policy had different impacts. This study aims to describe teachers' understanding of the Minimum Competency Assessment and its impact on assessments conducted in class. The data collection technique used a semi-structured interview method with seven MTs Muhammadiyah PPTQ Ahmad Dahlan teachers. The results of the study reveal that the teacher's understanding of the Minimum Competency Assessment is divided into translation, interpretation and extrapolation understanding. In addition, the assessment carried out in class by informants with an understanding of translation has not changed after the implementation of the Minimum Competency Assessment policy. Informants with an understanding of interpretation changed their assessments, while informants with an understanding of extrapolation felt there was no need to change the assessments carried out in class because they wanted to provide an overview of the actual abilities of students.
EVALUASI PROGRAM PELATIHAN KOGYO SENMON (KOSEN) DI PERSEROAN TERBATAS DN Huda Nur Rohmat, Huda Nur Rohmat; Abdul Rahman A. Ghani; Elin Driana; Sugiarto
Jurnal Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka bekerjasama dengan Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI).

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/jppp.v6i1.14521

Abstract

This evaluation aims to assess the effectiveness of the KOGYO SENMON(KOSEN) training conducted by Perseroan Terbatas (PT) DN. The training evaluationused the Kirkpatrick evaluation approach consisting of four aspects includingparticipant reactions, material mastery, behavior change, and results achieved. Datawere obtained through evaluation results, document studies, and questionnaires. Dataprocessing was carried out using quantitative descriptive methods. The results of theevaluation of participants' reaction to the organizers were included in the "Satisfied"qualification with an average score of 87. After the evaluation, it was found that theaverage score of participants in learning was 88, so they managed to meet thequalification of "Good". The behavior measurement based on the assessment fromsuperiors and colleagues received an average score of 85 with the criteria of "Good".While the evaluation of the result stage after the participants have completed thetraining with an average score of 83, qualifying as "Good". The evaluation of PT DN'sKOSEN training using Kirkpatrick can identify and evaluate all elements of trainingand is worthy of being used as a reference.
Improving Students' Academic Writing Skills Through Metacognitive Strategies Nusivera, Egi; Hikmat, Ade; A. Ghani, Abdul Rahman
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol 14 No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v14i2.89913

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of metacognitive writing strategies in enhancing academic writing skills among college students. A total of 150 college students in West Java, Indonesia, participated in this study. The method used in this study was factorial design analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to answer the problem formulation. The data collection instruments used were a metacognitive writing strategy questionnaire and an academic writing test with several topics. The results of the study showed that the questionnaire instrument for assessing the use of metacognitive strategies in the writing process was proven valid, as it effectively measured students' metacognitive awareness. Second, metacognitive strategies significantly contributed to students' academic writing skills. Metacognitive strategies act as high-level constructs, and a positive correlation was found between the dimensions of metacognitive strategies. The dimensions of metacognition that were found to be correlated and contributed to each other were declarative, procedural, conditional, planning, monitoring, evaluation, information management, and debugging strategies. From the comparison of the proposed models, the second model (eight-component correlation model) is more effective in contributing to academic writing skills than the first model, as it describes all the contributing components significantly more comprehensively. The study suggests that academic writing skills can be enhanced by increasing students' metacognitive awareness and reflective abilities regarding their writing process.
PENGARUH TES FORMATIF DAN KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI SISWA SMA A. Ghani, Abdul Rahman
Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2008)
Publisher : Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in cooperation with Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI) Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/pep.v12i2.1425

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji ada tidaknya pengaruh tes formatif dan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran Ekonomi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x2. Eksperimen dilaksanakan pada tahun pelajaran 2004/2005. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa Kelas II semester I SMA Negeri 63 dan 29 di Jakarta Selatan. Jumlah sampel 104 siswa dipilih secara acak bertahap. Eksperimen dilakukan melalui pemberian tes formatif bentuk esai dan pilihan ganda sebanyak 7 kali. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Penggunaan tes formatif bentuk esai dalam proses pembelajaran dapat memberikan hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi dibanding dengan penggunaan tes formatif bentuk pilihan ganda. (2) Bagi siswa yang memiliki kemandirian belajar tinggi, penggunaan tes formatif bentuk esai dalam evaluasi formatif dapat memberikan hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi dibanding dengan penggunaan tes formatif bentuk pilihan ganda. (3) Bagi siswa yang memiliki kemandirian belajar rendah, penggunaan tes formatif bentuk esai dan bentuk pilihan ganda tidak memberikan hasil belajar yang berbeda. (4) Efektivitas penggunan tes esai dan pilihan ganda dalam evaluasi formatif sangat tergantung pada tingkat kemandirian belajar siswa, pada tingkat kemandirian belajar tinggi lebih efektif digunakan tes formatif bentuk esai dan pada tingkat kemandirian belajar rendah lebih efektif digunakan tes formatif bentuk pilihan ganda.Kata kunci:      hasil belajar ekonomi, tes formatif, kemandirian belajar