Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Bioskop di Mal: Konsumsi dan Komodifikasi dalam Budaya Urban Gorivana Ageza; Aquarini Priyatna; R. M. Mulyadi
Patanjala: Journal of Historical and Cultural Research Vol 10, No 2 (2018): PATANJALA Vol. 10 No. 2, JUNE 2018
Publisher : Balai Pelestarian Nilai Budaya Jawa Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (693.772 KB) | DOI: 10.30959/patanjala.v10i2.385

Abstract

Di kota Bandung, hampir semua mal memiliki bioskop, dan sebaliknya, tidak ada bioskop di luar mal. Artikel ini akan memaparkan konsekuensi dari keberadaan bioskop di mal. Artikel ini disusun berdasarkan observasi lapangan dan studi pustaka, yang kemudian ditafsirkan secara hermeneutika dengan pendekatan teori kritis. Observasi lapangan dilakukan di dua bioskop terbesar di Kota Bandung yakni CGV Cinemas mal Paris van Java dan Ciwalk XXI mal Cihampelas Walk. Fenomena bioskop di mal menunjukkan bahwa kehidupan urban menyebabkan komodifikasi ruang dan pengalaman. Berbelanja di mal dan menonton film di bioskop mal mengarahkan warga urban untuk melakukan konsumsi, serta memaksimalkan keuntungan yang didapat oleh mal dan bioskop. In Bandung city, virtually all shopping malls list movie theaters among their venue. Conversely, there is no movie theater located out of shopping mall. This article explains consequences of movie theater in shopping malls. This article is written based on field observation and literature study, which then was interpreted hermeneutically, using critical theory approach. Field observations were conducted at two biggest movie theaters in Bandung’s shopping malls, which are CGV Cinemas in Paris van Java Mall and Ciwalk XXI in Cihampelas Walk Mall. This phenomenon indicates that urban life causes commodification on space and experience. Both the act of shopping and watching movies in shopping malls lead urban people to a consumptive lifestyle while maximizing the revenues of both shopping malls and movie theaters.
Dominasi Layar di Masa Pandemi dalam terang Pemikiran Anne Friedberg Ageza, Gorivana
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v39i1.7752

Abstract

Screen allows humans to experience and understand the world without being limited by the existence of their physical body. This is one of Anne Friedberg's main ideas in her works, which supports the main basis for this article. The Covid-19 pandemic that has occurred since March 2020 has limited, reduced, slowed down, and in some situations it could even be said it almost stopped human mobility, for example, in areas over the world where the ‘lockdown’ policy was applied. As a consequence, mobility turns into immobility. This condition corresponds to the reality during the pandemic dominated by the presence of screen. There has been growing importance of domestic space as the centre of everydayness that gives crucial role to the screen as its window to the world. This could be perceived as virtual mobility, in the sense that it was a ‘mobility’ without bodily mobility. This article elaborates Friedberg's thoughts with regard to virtual mobility that has been increasingly dominated by the screen, by examining its relevance to the actual conditions of the people during the pandemic. At the end of this article, the consequences of this massive virtual mobility and screen dominance during the pandemic are analysed—a situation that might bring further implications on the experiences of aura, panopticon, and consumption.
Implikasi Metafisik dan Epistemologis Mobilitas Virtual di Dunia yang Semakin Termediasi Ageza, Gorivana; Tedjoworo, Hadrianus
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 39 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v39i2.7778

Abstract

Humans created screen in the rapid development of technology, and its existence has fundamentally influenced people’s daily lives. One of the things most affected is human understanding of space and time. This article elaborates Anne Friedberg’s ideas in correlation with the views of other thinkers, especially regarding the metaphysical and epistemological impacts of screen to humans’ relation to reality since the pandemic. The metaphysical aspect of the screen concerns the materiality and immateriality of the screen, as well as how the concept of presence is understood in this context. Meanwhile, the epistemological aspect of the screen focuses on issues of perception and how humans understand the world. The metaphysical and epistemological implications of virtual mobility in a world increasingly mediated by 'screens' give rise to several different perspectives that can question the Carthusian and dualistic conceptual framework of reality. Just as plurality is a fact, the mediated world is also a fact. Correcting the metaphysical ‘tradition’ that has been recognised as the most determining rationality will not be an easy effort. In the discourse of science and certainty regarding the existence of reality, perhaps it is not the literal or symbolic screen that must be reinterpreted, but the human perspective itself. A person's point of view cannot be judged as wrong or right, apart from being recognised and respected as an element that forms the very rich reality. Recognising a multi-perspective reality will perhaps mark a return to amazement in the realms of science, philosophy, and life.
Dominasi Layar di Masa Pandemi dalam terang Pemikiran Anne Friedberg Ageza, Gorivana
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v39i1.7752

Abstract

Screen allows humans to experience and understand the world without being limited by the existence of their physical body. This is one of Anne Friedberg's main ideas in her works, which supports the main basis for this article. The Covid-19 pandemic that has occurred since March 2020 has limited, reduced, slowed down, and in some situations it could even be said it almost stopped human mobility, for example, in areas over the world where the ‘lockdown’ policy was applied. As a consequence, mobility turns into immobility. This condition corresponds to the reality during the pandemic dominated by the presence of screen. There has been growing importance of domestic space as the centre of everydayness that gives crucial role to the screen as its window to the world. This could be perceived as virtual mobility, in the sense that it was a ‘mobility’ without bodily mobility. This article elaborates Friedberg's thoughts with regard to virtual mobility that has been increasingly dominated by the screen, by examining its relevance to the actual conditions of the people during the pandemic. At the end of this article, the consequences of this massive virtual mobility and screen dominance during the pandemic are analysed—a situation that might bring further implications on the experiences of aura, panopticon, and consumption.
Implikasi Metafisik dan Epistemologis Mobilitas Virtual di Dunia yang Semakin Termediasi Ageza, Gorivana; Tedjoworo, Hadrianus
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 39 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v39i2.7778

Abstract

Humans created screen in the rapid development of technology, and its existence has fundamentally influenced people’s daily lives. One of the things most affected is human understanding of space and time. This article elaborates Anne Friedberg’s ideas in correlation with the views of other thinkers, especially regarding the metaphysical and epistemological impacts of screen to humans’ relation to reality since the pandemic. The metaphysical aspect of the screen concerns the materiality and immateriality of the screen, as well as how the concept of presence is understood in this context. Meanwhile, the epistemological aspect of the screen focuses on issues of perception and how humans understand the world. The metaphysical and epistemological implications of virtual mobility in a world increasingly mediated by 'screens' give rise to several different perspectives that can question the Carthusian and dualistic conceptual framework of reality. Just as plurality is a fact, the mediated world is also a fact. Correcting the metaphysical ‘tradition’ that has been recognised as the most determining rationality will not be an easy effort. In the discourse of science and certainty regarding the existence of reality, perhaps it is not the literal or symbolic screen that must be reinterpreted, but the human perspective itself. A person's point of view cannot be judged as wrong or right, apart from being recognised and respected as an element that forms the very rich reality. Recognising a multi-perspective reality will perhaps mark a return to amazement in the realms of science, philosophy, and life.