Yasmin, Alifah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Abnormal Concept Problems in Modern Psychology (an Analytical Study of Islamic Psychological Studies) Huringiin, Nabila; Ahmad, Miftah; Yasmin, Alifah
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): January - June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/it.v6i1.5510

Abstract

This paper describes the difference between the concept of human and the concept of normal-abnormal human behavior according to the views of modern psychology and Islam. And its suitability with the basic discussion of human nature. Conceptual discussion is of special interest by researchers because of its urgency in psychological studies. This is based on the phenomenon of society being confused in setting normal and abnormal standards. The researcher uses qualitative research, so the data used by the researcher is descriptive and narrative data, not numbers. The primary data sources used in this research are primary books related to modern psychology, especially in the specification of normal and abnormal studies, while books on psychology are generally a source of support for the results of the analysis in this study. The main focus of discussion in this article is the problem of the concept of normal and abnormal in modern psychological studies. This article explains that the standard of normal and abnormal in the study of modern psychology is strongly influenced by Western relativism. This is contrary to the concept of Islamic psychology which explains the study of normal and abnormal in detail and absolute. Tulisan ini menguraikan perbedaan konsep manusia dan konsep perilaku normal-abnormal manusia menurut pandangan psikologi modern dan Islam. Serta kesesuaiannya dengan pembahasan tentang landasan hakikat manusia. Pembahasan konseptual menjadi sebuah ketertarikan sendiri oleh peneliti dikarenakan urgensinya dalam kajian psikologi. Hal ini berdasarkan fenomena masyarakat akan kerancuan sosial dalam penetapan standar normal dan abnormal. Peneliti menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif, maka data-data yang digunakan peneliti adalah data-data dalam bentuk deskriptif dan narasi bukan angka. Sumber data primer yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah buku-buku primer terkait psikologi modern khususnya dalam spesifikasi kajian normal dan abnormal, sedangkan buku-buku kajian psikologi pada umumnya menjadi sumber penunjang hasil analisa dalam penelitian ini. Fokus pembahasan utama dalam artikel ini adalah problem konsep normal dan abnormal dalam kajian psikologi modern. Artikel ini menjelaskan bahwa standar normal dan abnormal dalam kajian psikologi modern banyak dipengaruhi oleh relativisme Barat. Hal ini bertentangan dengan konsep psikologi Islam yang menjelaskan kajian normal dan abnormal secara terperinci dan absolut.
Paradigma Otonomi Estetika dalam Diskursus Barat dan Islam: Sebuah Analisis Kritis: The Paradigm of Aesthetic Autonomy in Western and Islamic Discourse: A Critical Analysis Yasmin, Alifah; Chusna, Nala Alfia
Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies
Publisher : Center of Islamic and Occidental Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/jios.v3i2.50

Abstract

The slogan “art for art’s sake” emerged in modern western aesthetics developed as a paradigm viewing the autonomy of art, free from ethical, religious, or practical purposes. According Théophile Gautier’s theory, this slogan emphasizes beauty as an end in itself. In the modern era, its influence is evident in artistic products that prioritize formal innovation, subjective expression, and aesthetic experience, such as abstract painting, experimental architecture, and conceptual art. Within the context of Islamic modern aesthetics, this paradigm interacts critically with traditional Islamic views that integrate beauty, ethics, and spirituality, producing both adaption and tension in contemporary Islamic art, design, and visual culture. This study employs a qualitative research method through philosophical analysis and critical textual interpretation of Kantian aesthtetics and modern Islamic discourse. The research indicates that “art for art’s sake” is characteristic of Western thinking, which is free from religious and spiritual values. Meanwhile, aesthetics in Islam involves the integration of ḥaqq, khayr, and jamāl. Beauty in Islam must contain goodness and truth, and be based on the values of tawhid and religion.