Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KAJIAN KEBERLANJUTAN USAHATANI KELAPA DALAM DI SEKITAR CAGAR ALAM HUTAN BAKAU PANTAI TIMUR KABUPATEN TANJUNG JABUNG TIMUR Faried; Murdy, Saad; Hamid, Ernawati
JALOW | Journal of Agribusiness and Local Wisdom Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Journal Agribusiness and Local Wisdom
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis bekerja sama dengan PERHEPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jalow.v4i2.16494

Abstract

Coconut farming in the East Tanjung Jabung Regency, especially around the East Coast Mangrove Forest Nature Reserve has links to one another. This research aims to 1) Describe the deep coconut farming.2) Analyze the income of the deep coconut farming. 3) Analyzing the sustainability status of coconut farming in the vicinity of the East Coast Mangrove Forest Nature Reserve Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency from the ecological, economic and social dimensions. This research was conducted in four sub-districts around the Mangrove Forest East Coast Nature Reserve namely Mendahara District, Kuala Jambi District, Muara Sabak Timur District and Nipah Panjang District in July to September 2019. Coconut farming income for each farmer around the East Coast Mangrove Forest Reserve Rp. 2,676,011 / month is greater than UMR Jambi Province in 2019, the income of coconut farming in having an economically sustainable. The level of sustainability of coconut farming in which is based on a multidimensional sustainability index shows a fairly sustainable value with a value of 52.01. Based on that, it can be said that the coconut farming in the vicinity of the East Coast Mangrove Forest Nature Reserve is quite sustainable, where in terms of ecology, economy and social benefits for the community and does not cause harm to the environment. The most prominent or sensitive attribute to the sustainability of the ecological dimension is the cropping pattern and crop rejuvenation, the economic dimension is the development of coconut prices and the availability of inputs at the local level, for social dimensions, namely how to open land and community social activities.
7. DOCTRINE TESTING FROM A COMPLEX SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES IN THE AXIOM-BASED DOCTRINE TESTING MODEL AND SYSTEM RESILIENCE Farrid Hidayat; Suroso; Kurniawan; Hidayad; Muchammad; Tutikurniadinda; Rickydika; Faried
Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Triwulan Kedua
Publisher : Staf Komunikasi dan Elektronika, TNI Angkatan Udara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62828/jpb.v5i2.213

Abstract

This study aims to methodologically analyze the limitations of conventional doctrine testing approaches and compare them with contemporary complex systems-basedapproaches, using doctrinal axioms and system resilience as the basis for evaluation.Operational doctrine is traditionally tested through conventional approaches that emphasizenormative compliance, historical precedent, and limited scenario-based simulations. Thisapproach is based on the assumption of strategic and operational environmental stability andthe linearity of cause-and-effect relationships. However, the dynamics of contemporarystrategic and operational environments which are non-linear, adaptive, and produce emergenteffects demonstrate a methodological gap between the reality of the system encountered andthe doctrine testing mechanisms employed. The study uses a conceptual qualitative approachthrough a systemic-doctrinal analysis with a comparative method of epistemic assumptions,testing logic, and validity criteria of both approaches. The analysis shows that the conventionalapproach is prone to pseudo-validity because it assesses doctrine primarily based onprocedural compliance, rather than systemic resilience to environmental change andoperational disruption. In contrast, the contemporary approach offers a more structurallyconsistent evaluation framework in addressing the complexity of the strategic and operationalenvironment. Therefore, doctrine testing needs to be reoriented from a normative verificationmodel to a complex systems-based evaluation model as a structural methodological necessity.This research contributes to the development of a doctrine evaluation methodology that is morerelevant to the study of contemporary defense doctrine and strategy.