Karlina, Yunawati
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

ANALISIS DAMPAK BIMBINGAN TEKNIS HUKUM ACARA PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG DI MK RI TERHADAP ADVOKAT PERADI Karlina, Yunawati; Putra, Irwan Sapta
Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v3i2.69

Abstract

The article discusses the impact analysis of the PUU Procedural Law Guidance held by the Constitutional Court on Peradi Advocates throughout Indonesia. The purpose of the study, first is to find out how the impact of the PUU Procedural Law Guidance held by the Constitutional Court on the understanding of Peradi Advocates? Second, to find out the benefits for peradi advocates who follow Bimtek? This research method is normative law, with a statutory approach, a historical approach and a case approach. Primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. Data collection techniques by means of literature study, qualitative juridical data analysis. The results of the first study can increase the understanding and knowledge of lawyers peradi about the authority of the Constitutional Court. Secondly, they can construct a good and correct PUU application, can comprehensively control the PUU application material, get a conference overview of the PUU application flow starting from registration, document preparation and preliminary trial to the verdict trial. Suggestions for the future of the technical guidance are still carried out considering the magnitude of the impact and benefits of the technical guidance for advocates throughout Indonesia.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERUBAHAN MASA JABATAN KETUA KPK BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MK RI Nomor: 112/PUU-XX/2022 Karlina, Yunawati; Putra, Irwan Sapta
Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v4i1.114

Abstract

This research examines the legal rules related to the term of office of the chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)? And what is the impact of the Constitutional Court decision Number: 112/PUU-XX/2022 on the term of office of the KPK leadership. This research method is normative legal research with an analytical case study approach. Normative juridical analysis. The results of this study are FIRST The legal regulations related to the tenure of the KPK chairman are regulated in Article 34 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2002 Number 137, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4250) which reads: "Corruption Eradication Commission leaders hold office for 4 (four) years and can be re-elected only for one term of office". SECOND With the decision of the MK RI No 112/puu-xx/2022, the term of office of the "Corruption Eradication Commission Leaders who previously served for 4 (four) years and can be re-elected only for one term of office". So with the Constitutional Court's decision the term of office "Corruption Eradication Commission leadership has increased to 5 (five) years and can be re-elected only for one term of office" means that there is an additional 1 (one) year term of office of the KPK leadership from 4 (four) years to 5 (five) years