Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Problematik Pengaturan Frasa Gangguan Lainnya Sebagai Syarat Pelaksanaan Pemilu Lanjutan Dan Pemilu Susulan (Studi Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum) Muhammad Erfa Redhani; Retno Widiastuti; Aprillia Wahyuningsih
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 NOVEMBER 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The criteria for postponing general elections in Indonesia currently do not have legal certainty, this is because there are still multiple interpretations of the phrase "other interference" in Article 431 and Article 432 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections (Law No. 7 of 2017). The phrase "other interference" in the context of further elections and subsequent elections raises the potential for elections "to be postponed" not in accordance with the mandate of Article 22E paragraph (1) of the 1945 NRI Constitution which regulates elections to be held every five years. This research was raised to be discussed in a limited manner based on 2 (two) problem formulations, namely, 1) how problematic is the regulation of other nuisance phrases as a condition for the implementation of further elections and subsequent elections in Law No. 7 of 2017?; and 2) how is the idea of improving the regulation of other nuisance phrases as a condition for the implementation of further elections and subsequent elections in Law No. 7 of 2017? This research is a normative juridical research with a statutory approach (statute approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach) and case approach (case approach). The results showed, first, the phrase "other disorders" contained in Law No. 7 of 2017 is an ambiguous or multiinterpretive sentence can lead to abuse of power to postpone elections. Second, it is necessary to limit the regulation of other nuisance phrases as a condition for the implementation of further elections and subsequent elections in Law No. 7 of 2017.  
The Effect Of Economic Development On The Fulfillment Of The Right To A Good And Healthy Environment In South Kalimantan Province Nurul Listiyani; Rizka Zulfikar; Muhammad Erfa Redhani
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 6 (2021): December 2021
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v2i6.147

Abstract

The right to a good and healthy environment is a human right guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. Human rights in the field of the environment are very important, therefore the government should be present in ensuring that citizens get a good and healthy environment. The fulfillment of the right to a good and healthy environment is strongly influenced by variables outside the law such as economic variables, poverty, unemployment, and the Human Development Index (HDI).Because of that, This study aims was to exploring the relationship of sectoaral regional income (SRI), poverty, unemployment and Human Development Index (HDI) in spesific region to the environment quality.  Indicators used in this research are SRI of the industrial sector, mining sector, agricultural/plantation /forestry/fishery/livestock sectors, poverty, unemployment and HDI.  The type data used is secondary data from the Department of Environment, the Department of Energy and Mineral Resources,  and also the Central Bureau of Statistics of South Kalimantan Province for the period 2006 – 2020.Because of that, This research using secondary data from Central Bureau of Statistics for period 2006 – 2020. The method used in this study is descriptive quantitative using structural equation model.   Our results from this study were (1) SRI of the industrial sector, mining sector, agricultural/plantation /forestry/fishery/livestock sectors, poverty, and human development index (HDI) were give significant effect to environment quality because all value of CR ≥ 1.96 and probability < 0.05 (2) The unemployment indicator was not give a significant effect to environment quality because from the effect test, the value of CR ≥ 1.96 and probability < 0.05.