Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum
Aruan, Bagas Christofel
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
MENINJAU SISTEM RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA (STUDI PERJANJIAN INDONESIA-SINGAPURA TENTANG FLIGHT INFORMATION REGION) Aruan, Bagas Christofel; Setiyono, Joko
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 52, No 3 (2023): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.52.3.2023.292-300

Abstract

Perjanjian internasional merupakan salah satu bentuk keterikatan Indonesia dalam ekosistem hukum internasional. Untuk mengimplementasikan suatu perjanjian internasional sebagai bagian dari hukum nasional, diperlukan proses ratifikasi yang menetapkan perjanjian tersebut sebagai Undang-Undang. Penelitian ini mengkaji model ratifikasi Perjanjian Indonesia-Singapura tentang Flight Information Region (FIR) Tahun 2022 dari perspektif ilmu perundang-undangan, serta mengevaluasi dampaknya dalam dimensi politik hukum dan teknis penerbangan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, sesuai Pasal 10 juncto Pasal 11 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2000 tentang Perjanjian Internasional dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan, ratifikasi perjanjian ini harus dilakukan melalui Undang-Undang, bukan Peraturan Presiden. 
Kewenangan Inheren Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Perkara Pengaduan Konstitutional dengan Objek Putusan Pengadilan Aruan, Bagas Christofel; Rauta, Umbu
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): January-June 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i1.27828

Abstract

The authority of the Constitutional Court is often limited only to the judicial review of statutory products, not practice. The method used for this research is normative legal research using a conceptual approach, legislation, and comparisons. This legal research aims to examine the implementation of constitutional complaint schemes in various countries while reviewing the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court in reviewing constitutional complaint cases with the object of court decisions. The results show that the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea has many similarities with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia; at the same time, the German Constitutional Court gives rights to individuals, communions, and associations to file a constitutional complaint and the United States Supreme Court establishes several criteria for legal standing for parties who make constitutional complaints. Then, the Constitutional Court has the authority to decide on constitutional objections, including court decisions, considering the court's decision is analogous to the law itself. Furthermore, based on constitutionalism, the constitutional complaint is the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court. KEYWORDS: Constitutional Court, Constitutional Complaint, Court Rulings, Inherent Power.
Co-Authors Joko Setiyono Umbu Rauta