Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal At-Tafkir Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies
Marhaban
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Controversies of Hardline Islam In Indonesia: A Conflict Resolution Approach Nurkhalis; Marhaban
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): January-June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/it.v8i1.8333

Abstract

The existence of hardline Islam in Indonesia has changed the shocking Islamic culture without violence and has presented an attitude of extreme and radical actions. This research is studied through a qualitative approach with library research. The purpose of this research is to suggest Indonesian hardliner Islam and the government respond to every hardliner maneuver not equated with handling terrorists with a pattern of shot to kill. Therefore, the problem-solving of Indonesian hardliner Islam is resolved by Galtung-style conflict resolution with a “positive peace” step. The results of the research reveal that Indonesian hardline Islam cannot be equated with hardline Islamic movements in other Muslim countries that are similar to the Taliban style or terrorist movements. Most Indonesian hardline Islam is treason, extortion, and undermining against Pancasila by imposing the value of sharia as an effort in “shariatization” so that their movements contradict the highest state regulations that they fall into actions in the criminal category.   Keberadaan Islam garis keras di Indonesia telah mengubah budaya Islam yang mengejutkan tanpa kekerasan menjadi sikap yang ekstrim dan radikal. Penelitian ini dikaji melalui pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian kepustakaan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan saran kepada Islam garis keras Indonesia dan pemerintah untuk menyikapi setiap manuver kelompok garis keras tidak disamakan dengan penanganan teroris dengan pola diintai kemudian tembak mati. Oleh karena itu, penyelesaian masalah Islam garis keras Indonesia diselesaikan dengan resolusi konflik ala Galtung dengan langkah “perdamaian positif”. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa Islam garis keras Indonesia tidak bisa disamakan dengan gerakan Islam garis keras di negara-negara Muslim lainnya yang mirip dengan gaya Taliban atau gerakan teroris. Sebagian besar Islam garis keras Indonesia bersifat makar dan merusak pemahaman terhadap Pancasila dengan memaksakan nilai syariatisasi sehingga gerakan mereka bertentangan dengan peraturan tertinggi negara sehingga masuk ke dalam tindakan yang dapat diklasifikasikan dalam kategori kriminal.
Hubungan Ilmu dan Agama dalam Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali Sari, Maula; Marhaban
At-Tafkir Vol 15 No 1 (2022): AT-TAFKIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum dan Sosial Keagamaan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP2M) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/at.v15i1.4095

Abstract

In this study, the author explains how the relationship between science and religion from a fiqh expert, philosopher, and Sufi, namely Imam Al-Ghazali, is of course very important to study. The urgency or purpose of this discussion is to study the division of knowledge according to Al-Ghazali and see the spiritual development of an Imam Al-Ghazali. This paper is expected to make it easier for readers related to science and religion according to Imam Al-Ghazali and a bridge to understand the relationship between science, knowledge and religion according to Imam Al-Ghazali. The research used in this study is a literature study (liberary research) with a descriptive qualitative approach. The result of this discussion is that al-Ghazali's spiritual development is divided into three, namely before uzlah, during uzlah, and after uzlah. In his thinking al-Ghazali did not distinguish between knowledge and knowledge, both are the same. Therefore, al-Ghazali's concept is personal that the relationship between creator and creature is never united, only the closeness of creature and creator through piety. Al-Ghazali's religion and science are both objects that can be studied or studied and do not conflict with each other.
Co-Authors Nurkhalis Sari, Maula