Raisa Zuhra Salsabila Awaluddin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Comparative Study of Hamka and Quraish Shihab's Interpretation: Application of Gadamer's Hermeneutics in Qs. Al-Maidah [5]: 51 Luthfi, I'syatul; Raisa Zuhra Salsabila Awaluddin; Safri Nurjannah; Moh. Isbat Alfan Ghoffari
Journal of Islamic Civilization Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Journal of Islamic Civilization
Publisher : Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33086/jic.v4i2.3584

Abstract

Hamka and Quraish Shihab have a different understanding of the interpretation of QS. al-Maidah [51]. Hamka interprets this verse as an absolute prohibition of making non-Muslims as leaders. While Quraish Shihab interprets this verse not as an absolute prohibition, so that Quraish Shihab argues may make non-Muslims as leaders with certain conditions. This article will analyze the factors causing the differences in their interpretations with Gadamer's hermeneutic approach. Gadamer's hermeneutics is chosen because for Gadamer the result of understanding or interpretation is strongly influenced by the author's pre-understanding and context. In analyzing an interpretation, Gadamer considers four things, namely Consciousness Influenced by History, Pre-understanding, Hermeneutic Circle and assimilation and Application. After analyzing the interpretations of Hamka and Quraish Shihab using Gadamer's Hermeneutics theory, it can be concluded that the differences in their interpretations are influenced by the context of their lives and different educational backgrounds. Hamka lived when political relations in Indonesia between Muslims and non-Muslims were tense. Meanwhile, Quraish Shihab lived when politics in Indonesia was no longer heated and the lives of Muslims and non-Muslims in Indonesia were harmonious. Analysis of interpretation by considering the author's horizon encourages the creation of objectivity in assessing a work of interpretation. Hamka dan Quraish Shihab memiliki pemahaman yang berbeda mengenai penafsiran QS. al-Maidah [51]. Hamka menafsirkan ayat ini sebagai larangan mutlak menjadikan non-Muslim sebagai pemimpin. Sedangkan Quraish Shihab menafsirkan ayat ini bukan sebagai larangan mutlak, sehingga Quraish Shihab berpendapat boleh menjadikan non-Muslim sebagai pemimpin dengan syarat tertentu. Artikel ini akan menganalisis faktor-faktor penyebab perbedaan penafsiran mereka dengan pendekatan hermeneutika Gadamer. Hermeneutika Gadamer dipilih karena bagi Gadamer hasil pemahaman atau  interpretasi sangat di pengaruhi oleh pra-pemahaman dan konteks pengarang. Dalam menganalisis sebuah interpretasi, Gadamer mempetimbangkan empat hal, yaitu Consciousness Influenced by History, Pre-understanding, Hermeneutic Circle and assimilation and Application. Setelah menganalisis penafsiran Hamka dan Quraish Shihab menggunakan teori Hermeneutika Gadamer dapati disimpulkan bahwa perbedaan penafsiran mereka dipengaruhi oleh  konteks kehidupn dan backroug pendidikan yang berbeda. Hamka hidup saat hubungan politik di Indonesia antar Muslim dan non-Muslim tengah tegang. Sedangkan Quraish Shihab hidup di saat politik di Indonesia tidak lagi memanas dan kehidupan muslin dan non-muslim di Indonesia sudah harmonis. Analisis penafsiran dengan mempertimbangkan horizon pengarang mendorong terciptanya objektif dalam menilai sebuah karya tafsir.
Larangan Homoseksual Studi Analisis Tafsir Maqashidi Pada QS. Al-A’raf [7]: 80-81 Ahmad Murtaza; Raisa Zuhra Salsabila Awaluddin
Al-Fanar: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Al-Fanar: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Dakwah Institut Ilmu Al-Qur'an (IIQ) Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (340.734 KB) | DOI: 10.33511/alfanar.v5n1.17-28

Abstract

This article discusses the story of the Prophet Luth QS. Al-A’raf [7]: 80-81 by using the maqashidi interpretation method which was initiated by Abdul Mustaqim. The commentators agree to prohibit homosexual behavior that has been practiced by the people of the Prophet Luth. Although they have various reasonsfor prohibiting it, if you read it as a whole, the opinion of the commentators leads that homosexuality has violated the nature of human beings who live in pairs between women and men. However, using Maqashdi Tafsir is not only limited to prohibiting homosexuals which is limited by the meaning of the text but also results in the meaning behind the QS. Al-A’raf [7]: 80-81 when viewed from the maqashid, namely hifz al-din, hifz nasl, hifz al-‘aql, and hifz nafs, there is no benefit in homosexual behavior except for actions that go beyond the limits and has violated human nature.
Eradicating Poverty With Religious Moderation: Realizing Social Justice In Indonesia Fadhilah, Hanifah Nur; Nida, sofwatun; Irhas Sabililhaq; Raisa Zuhra Salsabila Awaluddin
Moderatio: Jurnal Moderasi Beragama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Moderatio: Jurnal Moderasi Beragama
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/moderatio.v5i1.11260

Abstract

Poverty is a central issue in social development in Indonesia. Religious moderation is expected to be a strategic approach to reducing poverty and realizing social justice. This research aims to explore and elaborate concrete strategies for implementing diverse moderation through qualitative methods and literature studies. The results show that religion has great potential in social and economic development. The implementation of diverse moderation through education plays an important role in instilling the values of tolerance, interfaith dialog, and respect for integrity. This education shapes a young generation that is inclusive and plays an active role in overcoming social inequalities. In addition, the optimization of philanthropic institutions, such as zakat, infaq and sadaqah, must be carried out professionally, transparently and sustainably to ensure equity. The synergy between education based on religious moderation and philanthropic management is expected to alleviate material poverty and create an inclusive and socially just society. Religious moderation becomes the main driver in sustainable economic empowerment, building social harmony, and realizing social justice as a whole.
Makna Lā Taqrabū al-Zinā dalam QS. al-Isra’ [17] Ayat 32: Tinjauan Bertrand Russell Atika, Elok; Raisa Zuhra Salsabila Awaluddin
Jurnal Semiotika Quran Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/jsq.v5i2.27246

Abstract

Ditinjau dari data Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional mengungkapkan, kasus pergaulan remaja seperti hubungan seksual, hamil diluar nikah, dan aborsi pada tahun 2023 mengalami peningkatan dari tahun sebelumnya. Penelitian ini mengkaji QS. al-Isra’ [17] ayat 32 dengan menggunakan teori atomisme logis Bertrand Russell pada tahapan isomorfis, yaitu menye-laraskan bahasa Al-Qur'an dengan realitas modern. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik deskriptif analitis data. Sumber data primer diperoleh dari buku Betrand Russel, sedangkan sumber data sekunder berupa tafsir, artikel, dan web. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis makna dari QS. al-Isra’ [17] ayat 32 dalam persepktif teori atomisme Bertrand Russell, menawarkan reinterpretasi ayat tersebut untuk memberikan solusi terhadap tantangan sosial modern, menekankan pentingnya pendidikan moral dan agama yang mendalam bagi generasi muda sebagai langkah preventif. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa QS. al-Isra’ [17] ayat 32 secara logis dan empiris sejalan dengan realitas sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ayat al-Qur’an dapat dimaknai secara kontekstual, baik secara literal maupun sosial. Ayat tersebut telah mengandung konsekuensi ketika seseorang melakukan zina akan menimbulkan dampak dari kesehatan fisik dan gangguan mental seseorang hingga menyebabkan kematian