Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Yudisial Kosmik Hukum Media Iuris Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam
Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
MENGADILI PERKARA NE BIS IN IDEM Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki; Rustamaji, Muhammad; Faisal, Faisal
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): NIETIG
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v16i1.570

Abstract

Asas ne bis in idem membuat pengadilan dilarang dua kali menjatuhkan putusan terhadap perkara yang sama. Hal ini agar putusan yang dijatuhkan tidak melanggar hak asasi manusia. Putusan Kasasi Nomor 957 K/PID.SUS/2018 adalah salah satu putusan terhadap perkara yang mengandung ne bis in idem, setelah ditemukannya dokumen BA-17 yang diterbitkan Kejaksaan Negeri Manado sebagai berita acara eksekusi putusan pada pengadilan tingkat pertama. Secara teoritis, perkara yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap dilarang diadili kembali. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengulas, apakah Putusan Nomor 957 K/PID.SUS/2018 merupakan putusan atas upaya hukum kasasi pada perkara ne bis in idem. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif, dan terapan dengan pendekatan studi kasus (case study). Hasil temuan dari penelitian ini adalah adanya kekhilafan hakim dalam mengadili perkara ne bis in idem pada tingkat banding dan kasasi. Peninjauan kembali adalah upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan untuk memperoleh secercah keadilan terhadap putusan hakim tersebut.
Integrating Customary Criminal Law into National Criminal Justice Systems: Indonesia and South Africa in a Southern Criminology Perspective Sitompul, Shalih Mangara; Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki; Muhammad Rustamaji
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i1.28621

Abstract

The urgency of integrating customary criminal law into the national legal system is increasing, especially in countries with legal pluralism such as Indonesia and South Africa. Both countries face challenges in accommodating customary criminal law that is alive and evolving in society, which is often subordinated by the colonial-based national legal system and modernization. This study uses a southern criminology approach based on the thinking of Antonio Gramsci to analyze the hegemony of national law over local law and fight for space for knowledge and legal traditions from the Global South in the criminal justice system. The type of research used is normative comparative legal research with the collection of secondary legal materials in the form of legislation, court decisions, academic literature, and international instruments related to the existence and treatment of customary criminal law. This research utilizes literature study techniques and qualitative analysis of legal documents, as well as a variety of juridical, sociological, and historical approaches combined with Gramscian hegemony analysis. The results of the study show that constitutional recognition in both countries has not resulted in ideal integration; customary criminal law tends to remain marginalized by national regulations and the modern legal system. However, with an integration model that places customary criminal law as part of the restorative justice process and recognition of legal pluralism, the prospects for harmonization are increasingly open towards a more just and inclusive national criminal justice system. This study emphasizes the need to strengthen the position of customary criminal law, political will, and legal education based on southern criminology.
Reforming the Role of Judges in Assessing Evidence Authenticity and Legality: A Comparative Study Using the Exclusionary Rule Approach Rustamaji, Muhammad; Sitompul, Shalih Mangara; Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki
Media Iuris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v9i1.77218

Abstract

The renewal of the role of judges in the authentication and examination of evidence has become crucial in line with the complexity of electronic evidence and the demands for the protection of human rights in criminal proceedings. A comparative study of the legal systems of the US (Miranda Rules), the UK (Judges' Rules), and the Netherlands (Wet Elektronisch Procesdossier) reveals disparities in the mechanisms for excluding illegal evidence. In the Indonesian context, through the Criminal Procedure Code Bill (Articles 222-228), efforts are being made to adopt the exclusionary rule in a limited manner by affirming the authority of judges to assess the authenticity and legality of evidence acquisition (bewijs voering). This normative legal research uses a comparative law approach and deductive syllogistic analysis to construct an enhancement of judges' technical capacity in verifying metadata, digital evidence integrity, and applying digital forensic standards in line with developments in Singapore's Electronic Transactions Act and Malaysia's Electronic Evidence Act. The findings of the study indicate that reform of the evidence system in Indonesia requires synergistic harmonization between the expansion of judicial authority as stipulated in Article 222(4) and (5) of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code and the strengthening of judges' technical digital competencies. These provisions grant judges the authority to actively assess the authenticity and legality of evidence acquisition, including electronic evidence, which requires a deep understanding of technical aspects such as metadata, data integrity, and digital forensic procedures. However, without this technical capacity enhancement, the expansion of judicial authority risks being ineffective and may even lead to wrongful convictions, which contradicts the principles of the due process model. Therefore, this harmonization must not only address normative and legal aspects but also practical implementation through intensive training for judges in information technology and digital forensics, as well as the provision of supporting facilities in courts. This approach aligns with practices in modern jurisdictions such as the United States and Singapore, which integrate the exclusionary rule with high technical standards to ensure procedural justice and optimal protection of defendants' rights. Thus, this reform is expected to strengthen the credibility of the Indonesian judiciary in facing the challenges of the digital age and prevent the misuse of evidence that could undermine substantive justice.
Prospek Penerapan Sanksi Adat Ammatoa Pasca Berlakunya KUHP Nasional Dalam Bingkai Teori Mirror Thesis Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki; Natsir, Muh Amin Rais
Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Staatsrecht Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam ( Issue In Progress)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/

Abstract

Pembaruan hukum pidana melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana menandai pergeseran paradigma asas legalitas dari pendekatan formil menuju pengakuan asas legalitas materiil melalui konsep living law. Pengakuan terhadap hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat membuka ruang bagi hukum adat, termasuk hukum adat Ammatoa Kajang, untuk diakui sebagai sumber hukum pidana. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis prospek penerapan sanksi adat Ammatoa pascaberlakunya KUHP Nasional, khususnya dalam kaitannya dengan pembatasan sanksi setara denda kategori II serta operasionalisasinya melalui Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 55 Tahun 2025. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis konseptual melalui teori mirror thesis yang memandang hukum sebagai refleksi nilai sosial masyarakatnya. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pengakuan terhadap hukum adat Ammatoa sebagai living lawtidak bersifat absolut, melainkan dibatasi oleh prinsip konstitusionalisme, hak asasi manusia, serta mekanisme formalisasi melalui Peraturan Daerah. Pembatasan sanksi adat yang melebihi denda kategori II menimbulkan ketegangan normatif antara keadilan komunal dan kepastian hukum nasional. Namun demikian, melalui pendekatan harmonisasi dan transformasi normatif yang proporsional, sanksi adat Ammatoa tetap dapat diintegrasikan ke dalam sistem hukum pidana nasional tanpa menghilangkan karakter restoratif dan ekologisnya. Dengan demikian, integrasi hukum adat dalam KUHP Nasional mencerminkan upaya pembangunan hukum pidana yang pluralistik, inklusif, dan responsif terhadap nilai-nilai lokal dalam kerangka negara hukum modern.
Co-Authors Faisal Faisal Muhammad Rustamaji muhammad rustamaji Natsir, Muh Amin Rais Sitompul, Shalih Mangara