Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Geoplanning : Journal of Geomatics and Planning JURNAL ILMIAH GEOMATIKA Indonesian Journal of International Law Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia Geoid - Journal of Geodesy and Geomatics
I made Andi Arsana
Department of Geodetic Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISA ASPEK LEGAL DAN GEOSPASIAL FORWARD POSITION BATAS MARITIM INDONESIA PADA PETA NKRI 2017 DI LAUT CINA SELATAN Arsana, I Made Andi; Susilo, Helik
GEOMATIKA Vol 24, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Badan Informasi Geospasial in Partnership with MAPIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1159.171 KB) | DOI: 10.24895/JIG.2018.24-2.815

Abstract

Peta NKRI adalah peta resmi nasional Indonesia yang menggambarkan wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Wilayah yang digambarkan dalam peta NKRI meliputi wilayah kedaulatan dan hak berdaulat beserta batasnya dengan negara-negara tetangga, baik yang sudah disepakati maupun yang masih memerlukan kesepakatan dengan negara tetangga. Peta NKRI telah mengalami beberapa kali pemutakhiran karena dinamika perkembangan wilayah kedaulatan dan hak berdaulat Indonesia. Setelah peta edisi 2015, peta NKRI kembali diperbaharui pada tahun 2017. Keputusan Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) tahun 2016 untuk kasus gugatan Filipina terhadap Republik Rakyat China (RRC) atas klaim nine dashed line di Laut China Selatan (LCS) berimplikasi pada status klaim maritim di kawasan tersebut. Berdasarkan Konvensi PBB tentang Hukum Laut (Law of the Sea Convention, LOSC) 1982, kawasan hak berdaulat maritim Indonesia meliputi sebagian kawasan LCS, yaitu di sebelah utara Kepulauan Natuna. Di kawasan tersebut Indonesia, secara legal, mengklaim hanya berbatasan dengan Vietnam dan Malaysia. Meskipun RRC memiliki klaim nine dashed line yang tumpang tindih dengan hak maritim di LCS, Indonesia tidak mengakui klaim tersebut sehingga Indonesia tidak berbatasan dengan RRC. Posisi Indonesia ini diperkuat dengan putusan PCA yang membatalkan klaim nine dashed line RRC. Makalah ini menganalisis klaim batas ZEE Indonesia dengan Vietnam dan Malaysia pada peta NKRI 2017 di LCS paska putusan PCA atas kasus Filipina- RRC. Analisis ini melibatkan rekonstruksi garis batas ZEE Indonesia secara geospasial di kawasan LCS dengan mengacu pada LOSC 1982 dan keputusan PCA 2016 atas kasus LCS sebagai acuan legal.
GOOD FENCES MAKE GOOD NEIGHBOURS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN FINALISING MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION IN THE MALACCA STRAIT BETWEEN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA Arsana, I Made Andi
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (437.072 KB)

Abstract

Maritime boundary issues are by no mean new for Indonesia and Malaysia. Notwithstanding the fact that Indonesia and Malaysia signed a maritime boundary agreement as early as 1969, the two States have yet to finalise various pending maritime boundaries between them. Compelling cases such as Ambalat Block dispute (2005, 2009), Tanjung Berakit incident (2010) another incidence in the Malacca Strait (April 2011) and others maritime boundary issues are apparently consequences of unfinished maritime boundaries between Indonesia and Malaysia. This paper seeks to analyse challenges and opportunities in finalising maritime boundaries in the Malacca Strait between Indonesia and Malaysia. It focuses on description of maritime boundaries between the two States, followed by recent developments in the Malacca Strait. An incident involving Indonesian patrolling officers and Malaysian-flagged fishing vessels which occurred on 7 April 2011 is the key case discussed. It is viewed as a relevant representation of what happen between Indonesia and Malaysia, which also applies to other areas where maritime boundaries are pending or absent. This discussion eventually highlights the importance of maritime boundary delimitation in the Malacca Strait between Indonesia and Malaysia. Options for maritime delimitation between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Malacca Strait are the main outcomes of this paper. This is achieved by taking into consideration principle of the law of the sea, relevant jurisprudence, and existing agreement between Indonesia and Malaysia. To accurately generate options for delimitation, geospatial approach was employed by utilising relevant geospatial data and technical tools and operations.
THE SINKING OF SOVEREIGNTY AND SOVEREIGN RIGHTS? MITIGATING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE TO MARITIME JURISDICTION AND A PROPOSAL FOR SOLUTIONS Arsana, I Made Andi
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 3, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

While some still debate whether or not climate change is a reality, one of its impacts, sea level rise, is factual. The cause and the rate of sea level rise might have been inconclusive but its impacts have been clearly felt. Sea level rise can also change the legal status of insular features (small islands/rocks and low tide elevation) that will also affect their capacity in making maritime claim. For an archipelagic State like Indonesia, small outer islands/rocks or low-tide elevation are important for location of basepoints forming the entire system of archipelagic baselines. This paper investigates the impact of sea level rise to the change of baselines and maritime limits a coastal state may claim. On the other hand, there is a need to have fixed maritime limits for better management and to balance rights and duties of coastal to the ocean. This paper provides options on how Indonesia as a coastal and archipelagic State can fix their baselines and or maritime limits in the face of coastal instability due to sea level rise as a consequence of climate change.
Mending the imaginary wall between Indonesia and Malaysia; The case of maritime delimitation in the waters off Tanjung Berakit Arsana, I Made Andi
Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia Vol. 13, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Due to its geographical location, Indonesia shares border areas with at least ten neighbouring countries with which maritime boundaries must be settled. As of March 2011, Indonesia is yet to finalize its maritime boundaries with various States including Malaysia with which four maritime boundaries need to be settled: the Malacca Strait, the South China Sea, the Sulawesi Sea, and the Singapore Strait (off Tanjung Berakit). It is evident that pending maritime boundaries can spark problems between Indonesia and Malaysia. The dispute over the Ambalat Block in 2005 and 2009 and an incident in the waters off Tanjung Berakit on 13 August 2010 are two significant examples. This paper discusses the incident in the waters off Tanjung Berakit, but will be preceded by a description of the principles of coastal States' maritime entitlement pursuant to international law of the sea. Following the discussion, this paper provides suggestions for settling maritime boundaries in the area from technical/geospatial and legal perspectives.
Studi Literatur Penarikan Garis Penutup Mulut Sungai untuk Penetapan Perairan Pedalaman Fatimah, Mukti; Arsana, I Made Andi
GEOID Vol. 16 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Departemen Teknik Geomatika ITS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12962/geoid.v16i2.1679

Abstract

Indonesia sebagai negara kepulauan berhak menetapkan perairan pedalaman dengan menarik garis penutup mulut sungai, garis penutup teluk, dan garis penutup pelabuhan berdasarkan UNCLOS 1982 pasal 9, 10, dan 11. Melalui koordinasi di bawah Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kemaritiman dan Investasi, hingga tahun 2018 Indonesia telah melakukan identifikasi penutupan teluk-teluk. Identifikasi terhadap garis penutup mulut sungai dan pelabuhan belum dilakukan karena belum memiliki standard dalam metode penarikannya. Berdasarkan pasal 9 UNCLOS 1982, jika sungai mengalir langsung ke laut, maka garis dasar ditarik lurus melewati mulut sungai di antara tepi sungai pada garis air rendah. Dalam pasal tersebut kriteria sungai yang mengalir langsung ke laut dan titik acuan penarikan garis mulut sungai masih belum dijelaskan secara terperinci, sehingga masih sulit diikuti secara teknis. Identifikasi tipe mulut sungai diperlukan untuk menentukan apakah sungai mengalir langsung ke laut ataukah melalui estuari terlebih dahulu. Jika sungai mengalir langsung ke laut, maka prinsip pasal 9 UNCLOS 1982 dapat digunakan. Jika sungai tidak mengalir langsung ke laut, namun melalui estuari, maka prinsip pasal 9 UNCLOS 1982 tidak dapat digunakan, sehingga diperlukan pendekatan metode teknis lain yang lebih relevan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan metode penarikan garis penutup mulut sungai untuk penetapan perairan pedalaman. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi literatur dari dokumen perundang- undangan, dokumen konvensi, dan dokumen teknis terkait. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah rekomendasi metode yang dapat digunakan untuk penarikan garis penutup mulut sungai. Penarikan garis penutup mulut sungai dilakukan dengan empat langkah utama, yaitu 1) identifikasi tipe mulut sungai 2) menentukan metode penarikan garis penutup mulut sungai 3) menentukan titik acuan garis penutup mulut sungai 4) menarik garis penutup mulut sungai. Indonesia as an archipelagic country has the right to delimitate internal waters by drawing mouth of river closing lines, bay closing lines and port closing lines based on article 9, 10, and 11 UNCLOS 1982. Under the coordination of the Coordinating Ministry for Maritime Affairs and Investment, until 2018 Indonesia has identified the bay closing line. The identification of mouth of ruver closing lines and port closing lines has not been carried out because it does not have a standard in the method. According to article 9 UNCLOS 1982, If a river flows directly into the sea, the baseline shall be a straight line across the mouth of the river between points on the low-water line of its banks. In this article, the criteria for rivers flowing directly into the sea and the reference point for drawing the mouth of river closing line are still not clearly explained, so they are still technically difficult to follow.Identification of the river mouth type is needed to determine whether a river flows directly into the sea or through an estuary. If a river flows directly into the sea, the principles of article 9 UNCLOS 1982 can be used. If a river does not flow directly into the sea, but through an estuary, then the principles of article 9 UNCLOS 1982 cannot be used, so that another, more relevant technical method approach is needed. This study aims to determine the method of drawing a mouth of river closing line for internal waters delemitation. This research uses literature study method from legislation documents, convention documents, and related technical documents. The result of this study is a recommended method that can be used to draw river closing line. Drawing the mouth of river closing line is carried out in four main steps, 1) identification of the river mouth type 2) determining the method of drawing the mouth of river closing line 3) determining the reference point for mouth of river closing line 4) drawing mouth of river closing line.
Kajian Terhadap Aspek Geospasial Kabupaten dan Kota yang Bercirikan Kepulauan di Indonesia Putri , Debi Nadia; Arsana, I Made Andi
GEOID Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Departemen Teknik Geomatika ITS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12962/geoid.v18i2.1775

Abstract

Indonesia adalah salah satu negara kepulauan (archipelagic state) yang memiliki kondisi geografis sangat strategis. Luas wilayah perairan Indonesia terbagi menjadi perairan kepulauan dan perairan pedalaman yang memiliki luas 3.092.085 km2, laut teritorial memiliki luas 282.583 km2, untuk zona ekonomi eksklusif seluas 2.936.345 km2 dan luas landas kontinen Indonesia yaitu 2.749.001 km2. Dengan demikian Indonesia memiliki total wilayah laut seluas 3.223.137 km2 dan luas daratan sebesar 1.890.739 km2. Jumlah pulau yang ada di Indonesia dan sudah terverifikasi pada tahun 2017 tercatat sebanyak 16.056 pulau. Pulau-pulau dan ruang laut tersebut merupakan satu kesatuan yang tidak luput dari pengelolaan dan tanggung jawab pemerintah Indonesia. Meskipun demikian, jumlah dan posisi pulau serta jarak antar pulau seringkali menjadi kendala dalam pembangunan sehingga menyebabkan tidak meratanya pembangunan yang ada di Indonesia khususnya pada daerah pulau-pulau kecil dan pulau-pulau terluar. Hal ini memerlukan perhatian dan langkah khusus agar isu ketidakmerataan pembangunan bisa diatasi, salah satunya dengan memberi kewenangan kepada pemerintah daerah dalam melakukan pengelolaan. Undang-Undang No 23/2014 pasal 14 menyatakan bahwa “daerah kabupaten/kota yang memiliki hasil laut mendapatkan pembagian hasil laut yang berada dalam batas wilayah 4 mil laut yang diukur dari garis pantai ke arah laut lepas atau kearah perairan kepulauan”. Hal ini menegaskan bahwakewenangan pengelolaan pulau-pulau dan wilayah laut diserahkan kepada pemerintah daerah kabupaten/kota. Pada proses pengelolaannya, daerah yang memiliki wilayah laut luas dengan banyak pulau tentunya berbeda dengan daerah yang tidak memiliki wilayah laut dan pulau-pulau. Karena kompleksitasnya, perlu dilakukan pengelolaan khusus untuk daerah yang memiliki laut dan pulau-pulau yang diistilahkan dengan “Bercirikan Kepulauan”. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi daerah kabupaten/kota yang bercirikan kepulauan berdasarkan aspek geospasialnya. Analisis dilakukan mulai dari 1) menentukan batas daerah laut 2) menghitung luas wilayah laut dan daratan 3) mengitung jumlah pulau dan gugusan pulau yang ada disetiap kabupaten/kota. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini yaitu kabupaten/kota yang memenuhi syarat secara geospasial sebagai daerah kepulauan yaitu sebanyak 66 kabupaten/kota.
The Unsettled Agreement of the 2019 Re-Demarcation of the Indonesia-Malaysia Boundary Line’s Impact Nurdin, Amin; Sudjito, Sudjito; Arsana, I Made Andi
Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/ijoms.v2i9.524

Abstract

Referring to the principle of uti possidetis juris, the establishment of the boundary line on Sebatik Island was based on a previous agreement between the Netherlands and the British. It was stated in the 1915 Agreement between the Netherlands and the British, which declared that the boundary line follows a parallel line of 4º10' North Latitude. Unfortunately, The Boundary Agreement of 1915 does not mention the datum and reference ellipsoid used to determine the abovementioned 4° 10' North Latitude. The absence of a datum and reference ellipsoid causes disputes in determining the precise location of boundary pillars during the field reconstruction procedure. A joint survey between Indonesia and Malaysia in 1983 found that most of the boundary pillars on Sebatik Island were not precisely located along the 4° 10' North Latitude line and based on the results of the 10th meeting of the Joint Working Group on the Outstanding Boundary Problems in 2018, Indonesia and Malaysia agreed to re-demarcate the boundary, which was carried out in 2019. This study aims to determine the impact of the 2019 re-demarcation of the boundary line between Indonesia and Malaysia on Sebatik Island. The methods applied in this research are in-depth interviews, observation, and document studies. The results found that the 2019 re-demarcation resulted in exchanging areas between Indonesia and Malaysia. This area exchange generates uncertainty about land ownership by citizens in border zones.
Extended Continental Shelf under UNCLOS 1982: A Comprehensive Analysis of State Submissions Taftazani, Muhammad Iqbal; Arsana, I Made Andi; Widjajanti, Nurrohmat; Schofield, Clive
Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning Vol 12, No 2 (2025): Article In Progress
Publisher : Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/geoplanning.12.2.%p

Abstract

Every coastal state holds sovereign rights over the continental shelf that can go beyond 200 nautical miles (M) measured from baselines. This is commonly known as an extended continental shelf (ECS). However, these rights of ECS must be scientifically proven by meeting specific criteria governed by Article 76 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982. Scientific survey activities play a crucial role in meeting such criteria. The results of these surveys are then submitted to the United Nations Commission of the Limits of the Continental Shelf (UN-CLCS) for review. To date, 95 applications for ECS have been submitted. This article comprehensively analyzes 34 applications, providing insights into the criteria for submitting applications for ECS and highlighting the significance and impact of the coastal state's scientific survey activities.
Examining the Negotiation Model of the Disputed Boundary Between Indonesia and Malaysia on Sebatik Island Nurdin, Amin; Atmoredjo, Sudjito; Arsana, I Made Andi
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sebatik Island is a disputed territory between Indonesia and Malaysia, known as one of the Outstanding Boundary Problems (OBP). The island was divided into two parts by the Dutch and British, based on the 1891 Boundary Convention and the 1915 Boundary Agreement. In 2019, after a long negotiation process, the two countries agreed to re-demarcate the boundary line by planting new boundary pillars. The results of the re-demarcation have not yet been agreed upon by Indonesia and Malaysia, resulting in unclear boundaries of sovereignty and jurisdiction. This study aims to examine the negotiation model of dispute resolution on Sebatik Island. The research methodology employed is doctrinal or normative legal research, which uses both primary and secondary legal data as sources, such as regulations, treaties, court decisions, and doctrines. The study found that the current bottom-up negotiation model has caused delays in reaching an agreement on Sebatik Island. To speed up the settlement of the dispute, it is recommended to modify the model to a top-down approach with a back-to-back or simultaneous mechanism.
Co-Authors Amin Nurdin, Amin Atmoredjo, Sudjito Fatimah, Mukti Helik Susilo Muhammad Iqbal Taftazani, Muhammad Iqbal Nurrohmat Widjajanti Putri , Debi Nadia Schofield, Clive Sudjito Soeparman