Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Recht Studiosum Law Review
Aqil, Nabil Abduh
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluation of Cash on Delivery System for Improving Legal Certainty in the Development Of Electronic Transactions In Indonesia Aqil, Nabil Abduh; Putri, Chelsea Mutiara; Yunisa, Dinda
Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2022): IPMHI Law Journal, July-December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang in collaboration with Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v2i2.55074

Abstract

Online transactions using the Cash On Delivery (COD) payment method play an important role in increasing the intensity of electronic transactions in Indonesia, this is because the COD payment method can reach consumers who do not have bank accounts or other digital wallets. The increase in the use of this payment method is inversely proportional to the public's perception of misguided understanding of the COD payment method, resulting in new problems such as consumers who are reluctant to pay for goods that have been ordered to protests accompanied by threats to delivery couriers. This paper aims to examine the weaknesses in COD transactions so that evaluations can be carried out in order to increase legal certainty for all parties. The type of research used is normative juridical using the statutory and conceptual approach. This study uses secondary data as the main data and uses library research as a material collection technique. All materials that have been collected are then inventoried, classified, and analyzed using descriptive analysis which aims to describe the problem so that innovative solutions are obtained. There are several shortcomings in this COD method, such as: buyer's misconception of the COD system, disinformation of goods with real conditions, and complicated methods of purchasing goods. This deficiency can be overcome in several scenarios, namely: strengthening legal protection for couriers delivering goods, using the principle of strict liability and reversing the burden of proof (reversion of the burden of proof) in the protection of E-Commerce consumers, and simplifying the rules for returning goods.
Implementation of Minister of Environment Regulation Number 7 of 2014 in The Implementation of Additional Criminal For Corporations That Commit Environmental Crime Aqil, Nabil Abduh; Syahrin, Alvi; Triana, Wessy
Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2024): January-June, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v4i1.71244

Abstract

The implementation of PERMEN-LH Number 7 of 2014 as a legal basis for imposing additional penalties for corporations raises problems because the related regulations have weaknesses in implementation, such as: aspects of legal synchronization, overlapping authority, potential legal consequences in the form of lawsuits against unlawful acts and uncertainty in determining the extent of the affected area due to criminal acts that affect the amount of costs incurred by corporations as additional penalties. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze To find out and analyze the implementation of the Minister of Environment Regulation Number 7 of 2014 in several environmental criminal cases. To find out and analyze the legal consequences in the Minister of Environment Regulation Number 7 of 2014 on the enforcement of environmental criminal law in Indonesia. Additional penalties as in Article 119 UUPPLH do not have detailed implementing rules regarding the mechanism of its application. PERMEN-LH Number 7 of 2014 which is often used by law enforcement officials in environmental cases has weaknesses such as: not in sync with Article 119 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management; there is an overlap of authority between the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry in terms of environmental restoration; and lack of certainty in calculating the extent of the affected area due to criminal acts. The imposition of additional penalties in the form of repairs due to criminal acts that are converted into a sum of money in Decision Number 256 / Pid.sus / PN Rgt; Case Number: 37 / Pid.Sus-LH / 2018 / PN; Case Number 349 / PID.B-LH / 2019 / PN.Plw has not been able to provide protection for the environment because it is considered non-tax state revenue (PNBP), which is entirely deposited into the State Treasury, thus the funds cannot be used as restoration or environmental improvement funds
Reoptimalisasi Perlindungan Hukum Saksi Pelapor (Whisteblower) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yanto, Andri; Hikmah, Faidatul; Aqil, Nabil Abduh
Recht Studiosum Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Volume 2 Nomor 1 (Mei-2023)
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/rslr.v2i1.11278

Abstract

Perlindungan saksi pelapor (whisteblower) dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi masih menjadi masalah yang belum terselesaikan hingga saat ini. Merujuk laporan LPSK, terjadi peningkatan jumlah pengaduan yang pesat pada 2021, dengan angka korupsi yang juga semakin meningkat dan memerlukan penyelesaian segera. Di Tengah kompleksitas tuntutan tersebut, baik LPSK dan KPK belum mampu secara efektif memberi jaminan perlindungan bagi saksi pelapor tindak pidana korupsi. Akibatnya, masih terdapat banyak kasus yang menimbulkan korban, baik saksi pelapor yang meninggal dunia, dikriminalisasi, atau mendapat ancaman dan intimidasi. Padahal, dalam hukum acara pidana di Indonesia, keterangan saksi adalah bagian dari alat bukti yang sah. Untuk itu, pemerintah perlu meningkatkan upaya perlindungan terhadap saksi pelapor sebagaimana yang diamanahkan dalam UU No.13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif, dan berupaya menyajikan solusi strategis dalam pengambilan kebijakan guna optimalisasi upaya perlindungan saksi pelapor tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Alvi Syahrin Andri Yanto Hikmah, Faidatul Putri, Chelsea Mutiara Triana, Wessy Yunisa, Dinda