Maulana Kafrawi, Rachman
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Orderly principles of state administration in selecting ministers Ariyanto, Bambang; Maulana Kafrawi, Rachman
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 30 No. 1 (2022): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v30i1.15868

Abstract

One of the advantages of the presidential system is the president's authority to appoint ministers without the intervention of others. The President's authority has been confirmed in Article 17 paragraph (4) of the Constitution 1945 which states that the President appoints and dismisses ministers. This regulation is also emphasized by the existence of Law Number 39 of 2008 concerning the Ministry of the State which states that ministers are assistants to the president in leading Ministry. The State Ministry Law does not set limits on how persons can be elected by the president to become ministers, whether from political parties, professionals, academics, practitioners; it is all purely the authority of the president. Limitations on ministerial candidates are only regulated in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 79/PUU-IX/2011asserting that the positions of ministers and ministries may not be sold as a political gift to a person or a group. On that basis, the question regarding what legal principles in the state administrative law can be referred to by the president in forming a competent cabinet is raised. With normative-juridical methods, the purpose of this paper is to find out the principles in state administrative law in the implementation of government, especially in cabinet elections. The results of the study show that the principle of the orderly administration of the state must serve as a reference in the implementation of government, especially in cabinet elections. This principle involves the basis of order, harmony, and balance in state control and administration. Besides, the ministers appointed by the president must avoid and be aware of the occurrence of maladministration that leads to liability personal, not job responsibilities. To strengthen the principle of orderly state administration, The Ministry of State must include this principle in one of its articles.
Disparitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Ambang Batas Usia Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden (Studi Putusan No. 29/PUU-XXI/2023 dan Putusan No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Ambang Batas Usia Calon Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden) Ashari, Ashari; Ari Amalia, Riska; Umam, Khairul; Maulana Kafrawi, Rachman
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 6, No 3 (2024): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v6i3.6967

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui disparitas putusan mahkamah konstitusi terkait ambang batas usia calon presiden dan wakil presiden, penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa jika dikaji dari aspek pertimbangan hakim mahkamah konstitusi dalam perkara nomor 29/PUU-XXI/2023 menyatakan penentuan usia minimal Presiden dan Wakil Presiden menjadi ranah pembentuk undang-undang (open legal policy), sementara dalam perkara nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 mahkamah konstitusi memberi tafsir bahwa Keberadaan kebijakan hukum terbuka (open legal policy) meskipun dapat diterima dalam praktik ketatanegaraan namun dalam perkembangannya Mahkamah konstitusi bisa saja mengabaikan atau mengesampingkan seraya memberi tafsir ulang terhadap norma yang merupakan open legal policy tersebut, sementara dari prosedur pengambilan keputusan dalam Rapat permusyawaratan hakim yang dilakukan dalam perkara Nomor 29/PUU-XXI/2023 ketua mahkamah konstitusi Anwar Usman tidak ikut serta membahas dan memutus untuk menghindari konflik kepentingan, sementara dalam perkara Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 dengan isu konstitusionalitas yang sama ketua mahkamah konstitusi ikut membahas dan memutus perkara dengan putusan dikabulkan sebagian yakni berusia paling rendah 40 tahun atau pernah/sedang menduduki jabatan yang dipilih melalui pemilihan umum termasuk pemilihan kepala daerah.