Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan At-Thullab : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah
Rohmatus Syafi'ah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV SDN 1 Bendorejo Trenggalek Rohmatus Syafi'ah; Muttaqin, Mukhammad Zainul; Widiyawati, Amelia Linda
Lentera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): Lentera
Publisher : STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52217/lentera.v15i1.537

Abstract

The results of initial observations, thematic learning in grade IV students of SDN 1 Bendorejo Trenggalek is monotonous and teacher-centered. On average, each sub-theme contains 50% of students who have scores below the KKM. The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of the talking stick learning model and its effect on student learning outcomes. Methods of data collection using observation and tests. Quantitative research approach with One Group Pretest-Postest Design. The sampling technique used is Nonprobability Sampling with the type of Saturated Sampling, namely all fourth grade students as many as 12 students as respondents. Observations using the learning implementation sheet and hypothesis testing were carried out with the Paired Sample T Test. This is shown from the results of observing the implementation of learning, the percentage of learning implementation is 100%, which means that learning takes place very well and the Paired Sample T Test test obtained a significance value of 0.000 <0.05, which means that there is a difference in the pretest posttest, so there is an effect of the talking stick learning model on the results. student learning.
Science Creativity Assessment Instruments in the Merdeka Curriculum in Elementary Schools Rahyu Setiani; Rohmatus Syafi'ah; Setyo Hartanto; Ela Rolita Arifianti; Dwikoranto
AT-THULLAB : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Vol 8 No 2 (2024): At-Thullab : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/atl.v8i2.2062

Abstract

This research is motivated by the alignment between the learning objectives of Natural Sciences (IPA) and the Merdeka curriculum, one of which is to develop student creativity. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare an assessment instrument that can measure student creativity, including creative thinking skills. This research aims to determine whether the assessment instrument to measure creative thinking skills is feasible to use or not. In this research, the approach employed is Research and Development (R&D). The development research method follows the Borg and Gall model. The data collection method uses a questionnaire that is given to validators. The validation sheet is the instrument used. Content validity is the method used for data analysis. The test instrument's validity was high, with Aiken's V score of 0.82, surpassing the 0.800 threshold for high validity. This makes the instrument reliable for assessing students' creative thinking skills. It is suitable for use in elementary schools to evaluate higher-order thinking and creativity. The implications are that the instrument can be applied in elementary schools to assess student learning outcomes at the level of higher-order thinking skills, particularly related to creativity. Guildford's indicators—Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration, and Redefinition—offer a comprehensive creativity assessment. Fluency (3 questions) measures idea quantity. Flexibility (2 questions) assesses adaptability to different perspectives. Originality (5 questions) evaluates the uniqueness of ideas. Elaboration (3 questions) examines idea detail. Redefinition (2 questions) measures perspective shifts. All questions are valid, ensuring accurate and thorough creativity evaluation.
Co-Authors Dwikoranto Ela Rolita Arifianti Muttaqin, Mukhammad Zainul Rahyu Setiani Setyo Hartanto Widiyawati, Amelia Linda