Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Melintas An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion ILMU USHULUDDIN Jurnal Perkotaan Jurnal Etika Respons JURNAL SOSIAL HUMANIORA (JSH) Jurnal Teologi Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Journal of Urban Health Research Jurnal Widya Medika
Yeremias Jena
Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
Religion Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : ILMU USHULUDDIN

 1 
GADAMER’S HERMENEUTICAL THOUGHT AND HABERMAS’S CRITIQUE Yeremias Jena
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 8, No. 1, July 2021
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v8i1.17070

Abstract

As long as humans always try to understand the deepest meaning of a text, symbol, or event, hermeneutics is a common activity. However, the gap between the creation of texts, symbols or events has created its own problems that must be solved. The problem is, should an attempt at interpretation of a text, symbol or event achieve its objective status in the sense intended by the author or writer, or not? Hermeneutic thinkers differ in solving this problem. Unlike Friedrich Schleiermacher and Wilhelm Dilthey who emphasized the importance of revealing the author’s original intent, Hans-Georg Gadamer emphasized the importance of the subjective dimension of the interpreter. In Gadamer’s thought, prejudice and cultural influences in interpreting a text, symbol or phenomenon are also considered as one of the horizons. Dialectic and horizon fusion in itself will be an internal mechanism to reduce the dominance of prejudice or subjectivity that cannot be accounted for. By paying close attention to Jurgen Habermas’s note that hermeneutics overemphasize the aspects of prejudice and cultural influences will only provide opportunities for certain communication distortions and cultural hegemony, Gadamer’s contribution can still be maintained as a human hermeneutical activity.
Co-Authors B. Dian Novita Darren Gosal GAI Kedang, Maria Gosal, Darren Santi, Bryany Titi Soegianto Ali Yunisa Astiarani