Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana Hukum Eksplorasi Joglo Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Research Fair Unisri
Bambang Ali Kusumo
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA SESUDAH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010 TANGGAL 2 AGUSTUS 2011 Supriyanta -; Bambang Ali Kusumo
RESEARCH FAIR UNISRI Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): RESEARCH FAIR UNISRI
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/rsfu.v5i1.4566

Abstract

This study is entitled evidence of witness testimony in criminal cases after the Constitutional Court decision No. 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010, dated August 2, 2011. The background of the problem is that juridically, theoretically, even practically, the evidence for witness testimony is what the witness heard himself, saw himself and experienced himself by mentioning the reasons for his knowledge. However, after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010, there has been a fairly fundamental change because the interpretation of the Constitutional Court on witnesses and evidence of witness testimony includes people who can provide information in the context of investigation, prosecution and trial of a criminal act which he does not always hear himself, he saw for himself and he experienced it himself. The Constitutional Court's decision fundamentally changes the value of proof of witness testimony in criminal cases. The purpose of this research is to examine and describe the evidence of witness testimony in criminal cases and their juridical implications in criminal justice after the Constitutional Court decision No. 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010, dated 2 August 2011. Research method, this type of research is normative juridical research. The nature of the research is descriptive. The type of data used is secondary data. The data collection technique is done by using literature study. The data that has been collected are analyzed juridically qualitative. The result of the research is that after the Constitutional Court decision no. 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 dated August 2, 2011, there is an expansion of the concept of witness testimony which was originally “a person who can provide information in the context of investigation, prosecution and trial of a crime that he has heard himself, he has seen and experienced himself , which was later expanded to become "a person who can provide information in the context of investigating, prosecuting and judging a criminal act which he does not always hear himself, he sees and experiences himself.
SOSIALISASI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 23 TAHUN TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PENGELOLAAN ZAKAT bambang ali kusumo; Supriyanta Supriyanta; Zulfi Rahman
Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 4 No 2 (2020): ADIWIDYA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/awpm.v4i2.4144

Abstract

So far, the distribution of zakat has been done by Muzaki (obliged to pay zakat, or giving zakat) giving directly to people who get zakat. The impact of this arises from queues of people who get zakat, the distribution of zakat is not evenly distributed, sometimes some get double and some don't. Therefore, it is necessary to socialize better zakat management, namely through the Amil Zakat Institution and Baznas so that the distribution of zakat can be maximally evenly distributed. The method of implementing this socialization is by giving lectures in vitual or online because it is still in a state of covid 19. From this service, community members have a better understanding and understanding of the distribution or distribution of zakat through the Amil Zakat Institute and Baznas.
TAX LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE PANDEMIC TIME COVID 19 Bambang Ali Kusumo
PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) 2020: PROCEEDINGS ICTESS
Publisher : PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal sanctions in the field of taxation consist of administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions, but in their implementation administrative sanctions are prioritized, considering that administrative sanctions are more profitable, because the time required is not too long and money can immediately enter the state treasury, but the weakness is that there is a lack of a good deterrent effect. against the perpetrator and potential perpetrator. In law enforcement, legal sanctions may not be enforced or their enforcement is postponed due to unavoidable disasters such as during the Covid 19 pandemic. Keyword: law enforcement, administrative sanctions, criminal sanctions.
POLICY OF TAX LAW ENFORCEMENT PANDEMIC AND POST PANDEMIC COVID 19 IN INDONESIA Bambang Ali Kusumo
PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) 2022: PROCEEDINGS ICTESS
Publisher : PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law enforcement in the field of taxation requires administrative and criminal sanctions. In certain circumstances, namely forced circumstances (overmacht or force majeure), the legal sanctions may not be enforced or their implementation postponed due to disasters that hit the community, including in this case the Covid 19 pandemic. The existence of this covid 19 pandemic will affect law enforcement in the field of taxation. Many taxpayers have difficulty in developing their business. The impact of this causes taxpayers to find it difficult to pay off their obligations to pay taxes. In view of this, the Government must issue a policy that is not burdensome to taxpayers. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Law Enforcement Policies in the Taxation Sector during the pandemic and post-Covid 19 pandemic in Indonesia. The main data source used in this writing is secondary data, namely Law no. 28 of 2007 concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures (KUP), Government policies related to taxation that do not burden taxpayers, both Central and Regional Government policies. The results show that Government Policy in tax law enforcement during the Pandemic and post-Covid-19 pandemic provides tax incentives and tax relaxation to the public, especially the business world, so that its existence is still ongoing. After the Covid 19 pandemic, the Government took a policy of optimizing tax revenues, focusing on VAT, tax regulations, optimizing tax revenues through the expansion of the tax base. Keywords: Law Enforcement, Taxes, Covid and post Covid 19
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (KDRT): PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (KDRT) bambang ali kusumo; Supriyanta Supriyanta; Regia Cahaya
Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Adi Widya: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/awpm.v7i1.8039

Abstract

The purpose of this service is to find out how the legal protection for victims of domestic violence according to Law no. 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence and what are the obstacles or obstacles that arise in the implementation of protection for victims of Domestic Violence (KDRT). The method in this community service is by means of lectures and discussions. Legal protection for victims of domestic violence is very much needed because all forms of violence, especially domestic violence are violations of human rights and crimes against human dignity and forms of discrimination. Victims of physical-psychological violence, sexual and neglect experience suffering and losses, so it is necessary to protect the rights of victims to obtain justice. The obstacle or obstacle that arises in the implementation of protection for victims of domestic violence is that domestic violence is often not reported to the police, because victims feel ashamed to open up household problems to other parties. family
Unsur Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.003/PUU-IV/2006, Tanggal 25 Juli 2006 Supriyanta; Bambang Ali Kusumo
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 4 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4441

Abstract

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membuat deskripsi tentang pengertian/makna unsur melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi setelah adanya putusan MK No. 003/PUU-IV/2006 Tanggal 25 JuliI 2006. Selain itu untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implikasi yuridis teoretis atas putusan MK tersebut terhadap pengertian unsur melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Metode penelitian terdiri atas jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, sifat penelitian deskriptif, bahan penelitian adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder serta tersier. Metode pengumpulan data dengan studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan-bahan hukum tersebut di atas. Metode analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam perkara pengujian materiil atas Undang-Undang No.20 Tahun 2001 tentang Periubahan atas Undang-Undang No.31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi berdampak pada makna ajaran sifat melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi dimana yang semula adalah ajaran sifat melawan hukum materiil dalam fungsinya yang positif, namun setelah putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut maka kembali kepada ajaran sifat melawan hukum yang formil, yaitu untuk adanya sifat melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi harus ada peraturan tertulis yang dilanggar. Kata Kunci: Sifat melawan hukum, Tindak pidana Korupsi, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Unsur Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.003/PUU-IV/2006, Tanggal 25 Juli 2006 Supriyanta; Bambang Ali Kusumo
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 4 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4441

Abstract

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membuat deskripsi tentang pengertian/makna unsur melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi setelah adanya putusan MK No. 003/PUU-IV/2006 Tanggal 25 JuliI 2006. Selain itu untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implikasi yuridis teoretis atas putusan MK tersebut terhadap pengertian unsur melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Metode penelitian terdiri atas jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, sifat penelitian deskriptif, bahan penelitian adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder serta tersier. Metode pengumpulan data dengan studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan-bahan hukum tersebut di atas. Metode analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam perkara pengujian materiil atas Undang-Undang No.20 Tahun 2001 tentang Periubahan atas Undang-Undang No.31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi berdampak pada makna ajaran sifat melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi dimana yang semula adalah ajaran sifat melawan hukum materiil dalam fungsinya yang positif, namun setelah putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut maka kembali kepada ajaran sifat melawan hukum yang formil, yaitu untuk adanya sifat melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi harus ada peraturan tertulis yang dilanggar. Kata Kunci: Sifat melawan hukum, Tindak pidana Korupsi, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Co-Authors Regia Cahaya Supriyanta Supriyanta - Supriyanta Supriyanta Supriyanta Supriyanta Zulfi Rahman