Articles
PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DAN PERWUJUDAN INTEGRITAS PUBLIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF MUHAMMADIYAH DAN NU
Biyanto, Biyanto
JURNAL PENELITIAN KEISLAMAN Vol 7, No 1 (2010): (Desember)
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Mataram
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
This article aims spesifically to discuss the experiences of Muhammadiyah and NU in eradicating corruption and upholding public integrity. This topic is important because Muhammadiyah and NU showed serious effort of eradicating corruption and upholding public integrity. According to Muhammadiyah and NU, corruption could clearly harm the state economy, reduce public welfare, destroy social morality, demolish political and legal systems, threat national defense, and hammer natural resources. Indeed, Muhammadiyah and NU never explicitly use the term âanti-corruptionâ. However, viewed from the substance of their acitivities, they do engage in eradicating corruption. Muhammadiyah and NU seek to uphold public integrity, such as the advocating of transparent state budget use. These two Muslim organizations agenda in this project include encouraging public awareness of the budge planning and composition and its implemention. Interestingly, Muhammadiyah and NU also use mass media to promote their agenda of upholding public integrity. It can be observed throught the publication of activities and accountability reports published in Matan and Suara Muhammadiyah, two magazines affiliated with Muhammadiyah, and Aula, NU community monthly journal. In addition, they also collaborate with other media, such as newspaper and private radio and television to build up a culture of public integrity.
Muhammadiyah dan Problema Hubungan Agama-Budaya
Biyanto, Biyanto
ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 5, No 1 (2010): Islamica
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (92.568 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2010.5.1.88-99
This article deals with Muhammadiyahâs view of the inter-connection between religion and culture. Religion is a divine product while culture is a human invention. How these two different domains are inter-related will be a kind of formidable task to expose. To do this, the paper will discuss first the possible relation between Muhammadiyah and Salafiyah as far as theology is concerned. Many have contended that Muhammadiyah is an extension of this rabian theology. The paper will try to trace if there is any such theological relation between the two by appealing to some basic concepts that both Muhamadiyah and Salafiyah hold such as the concept of puritanism; that the Qurâan and the prophetic traditions are the sole sources for both religion and culture. But we also try to explore the unique aspect of each movement of which the other does not share. Thus, Muhammadiyahâunlike Salafiyahâhas a good deal of awareness in culture and even adopts the âcultural approachâ in propagating Islam. As a religious organization whose task lies mainly in calling people into Islam, Muhammadiyah has advocated what is commonly known as the âdakwah culturalâ; a cultural approach in dakwah. For this purpose, Muhammadiyah has designed a guidebook on how âdakwah kulturalâ is carried out, its steps, and strategies. In writing his paper, we hope to shed a better light on the objective nature of Muhammadiyah and its view concerning religion and culture.
Suksesi Kepemimpinan Arab Pra-Islam dan Periode al-Khulafââ al-Râshidûn
Biyanto, Biyanto
ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 1, No 1 (2006): Islamica
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (103.641 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2006.1.1.76-85
This article analyses the character and nature of succession in the Pre-IslamicArabic society and in the period of al-Khulafââ al-Rashidûn. It assumes that both periodsshare a lot in common in terms of conditions of leadership, which include seniority,bravery, generosity, good and noble family background, and the ability to safeguard thetribe. The principle of consultation (mushâwarah), which Islam talks about on manyoccasions, is also present in the two periods. This is despite the fact that during theperiod of al-Khulafââ al-Râshidûn there were such practices as direct election âin the caseof Abû Bakr and âAlî b. Abî Tâlib-, appointment by the former caliph âin the case ofâUmar b. Khattâb- and election by a committee appointed by the caliph in the case ofâUthmân b. âAffân.
Pengalaman Muhammadiyah Membumikan Nilai-nilai Pluralisme
Biyanto, Biyanto
ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 7, No 2 (2013): Islamica
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (259.009 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2013.7.2.318-339
This article deals with the issue of religious pluralism in the view of the leading authorities within Muhammadiyah. The paper argues that the scholars of the organization develop a unique view of religious pluralism in line with the vision of the founding fathers. Apart from some âdiscursive distortionâ that these scholars might have undergone in the process of developing the discourse, their view deserves some appreciation for its depth and originality. The paper tries to show that there is indeed a tension between the cadres of the organization on the problem at hand. To dwell into this tension, the paper distinguishes between two major groups within the organization, namely that which accepts the notion of religious pluralism, and that which rejects it. The former includes such well-known scholars as Syafii Maarif, Amin Abdullah, Abdul Munir Mulkhan, and Moeslim Abdurrahman, whereas the latter includes the preachers and mosque-activists. Apart from these two groups, the paper will also look at the particular role that the Muhammadiyahâs Youth Movement has played in discourse-development among the members of the organization. Hence, the areas that the paper will cover include those that have been well-represented by the most admitted elements of the organization.
Positivisme dan Non-Positivisme dalam Jurisprudensi
Biyanto, Biyanto
TEOSOFI: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013): December
Publisher : Program Studi Filsafat Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (613.856 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2013.3.2.483-502
This article discusses about trend positivism and non-positivism paradigm in jurisprudence. This topic is important because discourse in social philosophy always relies on the rationality of whole arguments. The argument of justification is preceded through deductive reasoning, starting from paradigmatic premise that will be used to justify conclusion. Paradigmatic premise is the basic principles of truth which is believed to be the real truth. The real truth derives from personal experience in reflecting facts found in daily activities. In contemporary context of jurisprudence, there is a fierce battle between legal profesionals with its positivist paradigm (legal or formal law approach) and legal profesionals with its non-positivistic paradigm (legal morale substance approach). Many critics on positivism were responded by efforts to reform law through social movements. Social realist movement derives from diverse reality of socio-cultural configuration, within national life, will be significant when the movement is massively done, and supported by two pilars of civil society and political power. This opposition movement shall be continuously done to against the established side. The well established community has authority upon whole legal institution and usually will utilize all its power structures in order to maintain their interest.
Berdamai dengan Pluralitas Paham Keberagamaan
Biyanto, Biyanto
TEOSOFI: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015): June
Publisher : Program Studi Filsafat Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (477.242 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2015.5.1.164-189
The article asserts that plurality?particularly with respect to religious understanding?is a certainty and an avoidable matter, which should be wisely addressed. This is a pivotal issue as the fact shows us that Indonesia, naturally and culturally, consists of various different ethnic groups. Bhinneka Tuggal Ika?as national watchword?affirms that Indonesia is founded on diversity and difference. However, Indonesian nation has to unite despite of its diversity. In addition, Indonesia is also called a colorful state. This statement refers to the fact that there are a vast number of different ethnic groups, cultures, and religions that live and exist in this country. Empirically, plurality has often caused social conflicts which involve interfaith groups with different religious understanding. The conflict occurs when these different groups are unprepared to live together harmoniously and build coexistence. Therefore, it is important to continuously promote the values of pluralism and multiculturalism in order to create a better life order based on acceptance, respect, and tolerance. To do so, emotional and intellectual intelligences?as ?social modal??are urgently required. The writer argues that this is a way?if not the sole?to bring about solution to the problem of religious plurality and religious understanding.
The Role of Digital Competence for Pre-Service Teachers in Higher Education Indonesia
Hengki Muhammad Akbar;
Biyanto Biyanto
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 14, No 1 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (460.927 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1605
Progress in the digital era has accelerated in the past few years, including its impact on education, which must prepare competent human resources. Teachers are expected to have competencies that can meet the demands of the times. This study aims to describe the role of digital competence on pre-service teachers in Indonesia. Using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR), this article examines the results of research related to Digital Competence which raises the subject of students taking education department in Indonesia. The literature review was obtained from the “lens.org”, ”scholar.google.com”, “eric.ed.gov” “link.springer.com”, and ”sciencedirect.com” websites using the keyword “kompetensi digital” and “digital competence” with filter for the 2015-2021 years range. After that, it is filtered with the open-access journal option and language restrictions in English and Indonesian. The analysis is based on research objectives that support providing an overview of the role of digital competence in pre-service teachers from selected articles. After being reviewed through inclusion and exclusion criteria evaluated by quality assessments, five articles published are analysed. The result shows that digital competence plays a role in being an indicator in measuring literacy levels, improving pre-service teacher's learning outcomes, and contributing to the teaching process.
Positivisme dan Non-Positivisme dalam Jurisprudensi
Biyanto Biyanto
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013): December
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (613.856 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2013.3.2.483-502
This article discusses about trend positivism and non-positivism paradigm in jurisprudence. This topic is important because discourse in social philosophy always relies on the rationality of whole arguments. The argument of justification is preceded through deductive reasoning, starting from paradigmatic premise that will be used to justify conclusion. Paradigmatic premise is the basic principles of truth which is believed to be the real truth. The real truth derives from personal experience in reflecting facts found in daily activities. In contemporary context of jurisprudence, there is a fierce battle between legal profesionals with its positivist paradigm (legal or formal law approach) and legal profesionals with its non-positivistic paradigm (legal morale substance approach). Many critics on positivism were responded by efforts to reform law through social movements. Social realist movement derives from diverse reality of socio-cultural configuration, within national life, will be significant when the movement is massively done, and supported by two pilars of civil society and political power. This opposition movement shall be continuously done to against the established side. The well established community has authority upon whole legal institution and usually will utilize all its power structures in order to maintain their interest.
Berdamai dengan Pluralitas Paham Keberagamaan
Biyanto Biyanto
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015): June
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (477.242 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2015.5.1.164-189
The article asserts that plurality—particularly with respect to religious understanding—is a certainty and an avoidable matter, which should be wisely addressed. This is a pivotal issue as the fact shows us that Indonesia, naturally and culturally, consists of various different ethnic groups. Bhinneka Tuggal Ika—as national watchword—affirms that Indonesia is founded on diversity and difference. However, the Indonesian nation has to unite despite its diversity. In addition, Indonesia is also called a colourful state. This statement refers to the fact that there are a vast number of different ethnic groups, cultures, and religions that live and exist in this country. Empirically, plurality has often caused social conflicts which involve interfaith groups with different religious understanding. The conflict occurs when these different groups are unprepared to live together harmoniously and build coexistence. Therefore, it is important to continuously promote the values of pluralism and multiculturalism in order to create a better life order based on acceptance, respect, and tolerance. To do so, emotional and intellectual intelligence—as “social modal”—are urgently required. The writer argues that this is a way—if not the sole—to bring about a solution to the problem of religious plurality and religious understanding.
Pluralism in the perspective of Semitic religions
Biyanto Biyanto
Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies
Publisher : IAIN Salatiga
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.18326/ijims.v5i2.255-282
This article explores the concepts of religious pluralism in the perspective ofSemitic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. As Semitic religions, thethree actually share some teaching similarities in the field of theology. But, inso a long history development, it turns out that there are some differences intheir theological teachings. The power history and politics factors have alsoinfluenced the relation between the followers of the Semitic religions. There-fore, it is important to explore deeply the concepts of pluralism in the threereligions and also the development of the thoughts about the religious plural-ism among the philosophers and theologians in each of the religion. This isdue to the fact that in this present context, all religions in this globe facesimilar problems dealing with the pluralism where one of the indicators is theoccurrence of radicalism even terrorism cases involving the followers of eachreligion. The triggering factor is that the followers of each religion are notready to live in diversity. It is due to the high amount of socio-religion-nu-anced radicalism cases that a number of thinkers from the three religions havebeen trying to reformulate the meanings of pluralism in the present contextwith the target to have some active involvements among the followers of theSemitic religions to solve the plurality problem. At present there is someawareness among the thinkers that each group of religion should not have some thoughts that they are the best, and it is only they that possess theheaven. Such a claim is growing from a group’s subjectivity. If this happens, itmeans that there is a threat to any efforts in implanting the values of pluralism.Artikel ini membahas konsep pluralisme keagamaan dalam perspektif agama-agama semitik, yakni Yahudi, Kristen, dan Islam. Sebagai agama semitik atauagama samawi, tiga agama tersebut sebenarnya memiliki kesamaan ajaran dibidang teologi. Tetapi dalam perkembangan sejarah yang begitu panjang ternyataada beberapa ajaran teologi yang berbeda. Faktor sejarah dan politik kekuasaanjuga berpengaruh terhadap hubungan pemeluk tiga agama wahyu tersebut.Karena itu penting ditelaah secara mendalam konsep pluralisme tiga agamatersebut. Juga penting dibahas perkembangan pemikiran tentang pluralismekeagamaan di kalangan filsuf dan teolog dari masing-masing agama. Sebab,dalam konteks kekinian semua agama di dunia ini menghadapi problem yangsama berkaitan dengan pluralisme. Diantara indikatornya, masih sering terjadikasus radikalisme, bahkan terorisme, yang melibatkan pemeluk masing-masingagama. Jika dlacak faktor pemicunya adalah ketidaksiapan pemeluk masing-masing agama untuk hidup dalam kemajemukan. Seiring dengan banyaknyakasus radikalisme sosial bernuansa agama itulah sejumlah pemikir dari tigaagama semitik tersebut telah berupaya untuk merumuskan kembali maknapluralisme dalam konteks kekinian. Targetnya adalah adanya keterlibatan yangaktif antarpemeluk agama semitik untuk mengatasi problem pluralitas. Kiniada kesadaran di kalangan pemikir agama-agama semitik bahwa setiap kelompoktidak dibenarkan merasa paling unggul dan menganggap kelompok lain tidakberarti. Juga tidak dibenarkan ada klaim kebenaran bahwa surga hanya milikkelompok tertentu. Klaim tersebut jelas tumbuh dari subjektifitas kelompok.Jika itu terjadi berarti ancaman terhadap usaha untuk membumikan nilai-nilai pluralisme.