Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Medika Hutama JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Permohonan Sita Marital Harta Bersama dalam Perkara Perceraian Analisis Putusan Perkara Nomor 411/Pdt/2020/PT.DKI Jo.No.727/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Brt Vindy Puri Amaliyani; Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 22, No 2 (2022): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v22i2.2155

Abstract

Every marriage is expected to be an eternal and happy family, but in fact, many households end up in divorce. Divorce often creates a new problem related to the distribution of joint property. Therefore, the law has regulated the protection of the joint property by applying for Marital confiscation as a form of guarantee in terms of obtaining its share at the time of the Distribution of Joint Assets later. The purpose of this study was to determine how the application of marital confiscation of joint property in divorce. To answer these problems, a research was carried out through a normative approach and using library data collection methods and interviews. The results of this study are the basis or reason for the rejection of Marital confiscation in the case studied is the judge's consideration which states that the application for distribution of joint assets cannot be combined with the lawsuit for divorce. In fact, in this case, the petition for the distribution of joint assets was not requested at all, but in the petitum, only the marital confiscation was requested. The impact of the rejection of this marital confiscation is that the joint property can be transferred to a third party without the knowledge of the other litigants.
State Institutional Law: The DSN-MUI Institution and its Role in Preventing Sharia Disputes Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Selian; Nur Rohim Yunus; Abdurrauf Abdurrauf
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 10, No 4 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v10i4.34031

Abstract

This article's goal is to explain how the National Sharia Council Institution - Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI) works to avoid sharia conflicts. The purpose of this research is to provide a holistic view of the DSN-MUI's role in settling potential disputes involving sharia-related components of different spheres of life. This article uses a qualitative research method with a literature approach, meaning that it takes information from previously published works at the DSN-MUI Institute and the role it plays. The information collected is then critically examined to reveal how the DSN-MUI can be used to avoid and resolve sharia-based legal problems. The findings of the study indicate that the DSN-MUI Institute plays a significant part in the avoidance of sharia disagreements by issuing fatwas and guidance. Because the DSN-MUI acts as a respected authority in interpreting Islamic law and offering guidance on its application, it is able to avoid or resolve a variety of possible issues that may develop as a result of differences in the interpretations of Islamic law. In addition, the DSN-MUI serves as a community-recognized organization for the resolution of disputes, thereby assisting in the prevention of conflicts and the discovery of solutions that are in conformity with the tenets of sharia law.Keywords: DSN-MUI; Sharia Disputes; The Role of Prevention Abstrak:Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Lembaga Dewan Syariah Nasional - Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI) bekerja untuk menghindari konflik syariah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan pandangan holistik tentang peran DSN-MUI dalam penyelesaian potensi sengketa yang melibatkan komponen-komponen yang terkait dengan syariah dari berbagai bidang kehidupan. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan literatur, artinya mengambil informasi dari karya-karya yang diterbitkan sebelumnya di Institut DSN-MUI dan peran yang dimainkannya. Informasi yang terkumpul kemudian dikaji secara kritis untuk mengungkap bagaimana DSN-MUI dapat digunakan untuk menghindari dan menyelesaikan permasalahan hukum berbasis syariah. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa DSN-MUI Institute berperan penting dalam menghindari perselisihan syariah dengan mengeluarkan fatwa dan tuntunan. Karena DSN-MUI bertindak sebagai otoritas yang dihormati dalam menafsirkan hukum Islam dan menawarkan pedoman penerapannya, ia mampu menghindari atau menyelesaikan berbagai kemungkinan masalah yang mungkin berkembang sebagai akibat dari perbedaan interpretasi hukum Islam. Selain itu, DSN-MUI berfungsi sebagai organisasi penyelesaian sengketa yang diakui masyarakat, sehingga membantu pencegahan konflik dan penemuan solusi yang sesuai dengan prinsip hukum syariah.Kata Kunci: DSN-MUI; Sengketa Syariah; Peran Pencegahan
Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Praktik Kartel Pada Industri Minyak Goreng (Studi Putusan Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. Nomor 03/KPPU/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Nomor 582k/Pdt.Sus/2011.) Ulya, Rafa'any Darajatanti; Selian, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah; Rahmatullah, Indra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.17788

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of indirect evidence in handling cartel practices in the cooking oil industry, focusing on a case study of Decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. No.03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Number 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. The research method used is the juridical-normative approach, which relies on legal sources such as laws and regulations, legal principles, norms, principles, and expert opinions to analyze the issues studied. In the KPPU decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) stated that 21 cooking oil producers were proven to have practiced cartels. However, business actors applied with the Central Jakarta District Court, which then overturned the decision through Decision No. 03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST. The cancellation was based on the consideration that KPPU only relied on analysis, theories, and definitions considered speculative and not supported by substantial evidence. KPPU then filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and upheld the settlement of the first-level court through Decision No. 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. This study also highlights that challenges in indirect evidence can be overcome by implementing a leniency program, as has been implemented in various countries. This program incentivizes parties involved in the cartel to disclose information to the competition authority.
Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Praktik Kartel Pada Industri Minyak Goreng (Studi Putusan Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. Nomor 03/KPPU/2010/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Nomor 582k/Pdt.Sus/2011.) Ulya, Rafa'any Darajatanti; Selian, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah; Rahmatullah, Indra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i2.17788

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of indirect evidence in handling cartel practices in the cooking oil industry, focusing on a case study of Decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009 Jo. No.03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Number 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. The research method used is the juridical-normative approach, which relies on legal sources such as laws and regulations, legal principles, norms, principles, and expert opinions to analyze the issues studied. In the KPPU decision No. 24/KPPU-I/2009, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) stated that 21 cooking oil producers were proven to have practiced cartels. However, business actors applied with the Central Jakarta District Court, which then overturned the decision through Decision No. 03/KPPU/2010/PN.JKT.PST. The cancellation was based on the consideration that KPPU only relied on analysis, theories, and definitions considered speculative and not supported by substantial evidence. KPPU then filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and upheld the settlement of the first-level court through Decision No. 582K/PDT.SUS/2011. This study also highlights that challenges in indirect evidence can be overcome by implementing a leniency program, as has been implemented in various countries. This program incentivizes parties involved in the cartel to disclose information to the competition authority.
Co-Authors Abdurrauf Abdurrauf Amalia Fitri Kusuma Dewi Ardina Yolanda Budi Firmana Firdaus Hanna Wijaya Hanna Wijaya Imam Santoso Indra Rahmatullah, Indra Mochamad Azyimardi Rayadhi Nisrina Mutiara Dewi Raines Indah Mutiara Ulya, Rafa'any Darajatanti Vindy Puri Amaliyani Yana Sylvana Yohanes Firmansyah Yunus, Nur Rohim