Articles
<![CDATA[Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencucian Uang Yang Dilakukan Oleh PT. First Anugerah Karya Wisata (Studi Kasus : Putusan Nomor : 3096 K/Pid.Sus/2018) ]]>
<![CDATA[Iga Ayu Mawarni]]>;
<![CDATA[Asmawi Asmawi]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Siradj]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 3 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i3.16601
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa perampasan asset untuk negara dari PT First Anugerah Karya Wisata sudah sesuai dengan asas keadilan dan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku dan juga menjelaskan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan serta mendeskripsikan hakim dalam menginterpretasikan pasal-pasal yang digunakan. Dari segi jenis penelitian hukum, jenis Tipe penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif, yaitu pendekatan yang mengacu kepada norma-norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan-putusan pengadilan serta norma-norma hukum yang terdapat dalam masyarakat. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa apabila dilihat dari sisi korban tidak terpenuhinya rasa keadilan dalam putusan ini tidak juga ada kemanfaatan hukum yang terkandung dalam putusan ini. Mengingat sampai pada tingkat Kasasi, Hakim tetap menyatakan aset dirampas untuk negara yang sejatinya tidak ada sedikitpun kerugian negara yang dialami. Kata Kunci: Tindak Pidana, Penipuan, Pencucian Uang, Perampasan Aset.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengedaran Farmasi Ilegal Golongan Kosmetika Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen; Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Martapura No. 361/pid.sus/2017/pn.mtp ]]>
<![CDATA[Inayatul Mukaromah]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Sidradj]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 4 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i4.13905
<![CDATA[AbstractThe problem of this research is the presence of business actors who sell pharmaceuticals in the form of cosmetics which are unfit for circulation for almost two years. But in its consideration, the Panel of Judges disagreed with the actions taken by BPOM in practice that were deemed not in accordance with the duties and functions as they should, so the Judge considered that this matter was detrimental to the defendant. This research method uses qualitative research by using a normative-empirical research approach. The study also uses a law in books approach and an empirical approach. The results showed that in the perspective of the UUPK, the defendant violated Article 4, 7 and 8 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. BPOM's actions towards the defendant in the Martapura District Court's decision No. 361 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Mtp are in accordance with the main duties and functions stipulated in Article 4 of Presidential Regulation Number 80 Year 2017 concerning BPOM RI.Keywords: Distribution, Pharmacy, Illegal Cosmetics, Consumer Protection, Legal Certainty, BPOM RI ]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Keberatan Atas Putusan Arbitrase Bpsk Jakarta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 (Studi Kasus Putusan Bpsk No. 099/Pts.A/Bpsk-Dki/Ii/2012) ]]>
<![CDATA[Riski Ananda]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Siradj]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.17080
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to ascertain consumer protection under the Jakarta BPSK Arbitration judgment through an examination of a car purchasing and selling case involving business actors PT. Nissan Motor Indonesia and their customer Ludmilla Arief. The purpose of this study is to examine the regulations governing advertising used by business actors to deceive customers. Additionally, it attempts to examine and compare the BPSK Arbitration ruling about consumer protection in the context of deceptive advertising. Through a law and case perspective, this study employs empirical legal research methods and literature. The findings indicated that the Arbitration Award's (BPSK) legal basis, namely Article 9 Paragraph (1) letter k and Article 10 of Law No. 8 of 1999, was consistent with the Consumer Protection Law's requirements. As a result, PT. Nissan Motor Indonesia is liable for consumer losses under Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Act.]]>
<![CDATA[Law and Sovereignty of the State in the Renegotiation of Freeport Contracts in Papua ]]>
<![CDATA[Khamami Zada]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Mustolih]]>;
<![CDATA[Diana Mutia Habibaty]]>;
<![CDATA[Lukman Hakim]]>;
<![CDATA[Desy Purwaningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Trini Diyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i2.21546
<![CDATA[The mineral and coal mines have long been managed by foreign contracts between governments and foreigners. The position threatens the state's sovereignty over the wealth of natural resources. The study was to analyze the renege-management of Indonesia's Freeport mines in Papua. Socio-legal methods were used to analyze the renegotiation of Indonesia's Freeport management. The study found that according to the principle of state mastery over natural resources as a common property of Indonesian people's prosperity as in article 33 verses (3) constitution of 1945, the Indonesian government officially took over its 51-percent share of Freeport. It is part of an expression of national sovereignty over the management of its natural resources. With this position, Freeport's mining management is no longer based on a contract of work, but a Special Mining Business License which provides guarantees to business holders to have their licenses extended to provide certainty to mining business actors in conducting mining business in Indonesia.Keywords: Renegotiation; Freeport; State Sovereignity Hukum dan Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Renegosiasi Kontrak Freeport Di Papua Abstrak Pertambangan mineral dan batubara selama ini dikelola pihak asing berdasarkan kontrak antara pemerintah dan pihak asing. Posisi ini sesungguhnya mengancam kedaulatan negara atas kekeyaaan sumberdaya alam. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis renegosiasi pengelolaan tambang PT Freeport Indonesia di Papua. Metode socio-legal digunakan untuk menganalisis renegosiasi pengelolaan tambang PT Freeport Indonesia. Studi ini menemukan bahwa berdasarkan prinsip penguasaan negara atas sumberdaya alam sebagai common property bangsa Indonesia untuk kemakmuran rakyat sebagaimana pasal 33 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Pemerintah Indonesia secara resmi mengambil alih saham PT. Freeport Indonesia sebesar 51 %. Kebijakan ini merupakan bagian dari perwujudan kedaulatan negara atas pengelolaan sumberdaya alamnya. Dengan posisi ini, pengelolaan tambang Freeport bukan lagi berdasarkan kontrak karya, melainkan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Khusus yang memberikan jaminan kepada pemegang usaha untuk diperpanjang izinnya unutk memberikan kepastian kepada pelaku usaha pertambangan dalam melakukan bisnis pertambangan di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Renegosiasi; Freeport; Kedaulatan Negara Закон и суверенитет государствапри пересмотре договоров Freeport в Папуа АннотацияДо настоящего времени управление добычей полезных ископаемых и угля осуществлялось иностранными сторонами на основании договоров между правительством и иностранными сторонами. Эта позиция фактически угрожает суверенитету государства над богатством природных ресурсов. Данное исследование направлено на анализ пересмотра условий руководства рудником компании Freeport Indonesia в Папуа. Социально-правовой метод был использован для анализа пересмотра условий руководства рудником компании Freeport Indonesia. Это исследование показало, что на основе принципа государственного контроля над природными ресурсами как общей собственностью индонезийского народа для процветания народа, как указано в пункте (3) статьи 33 Конституции 1945 года, правительство Индонезии официально приняло на себя акции из компании Freeport Indonesia на 51%. Эта политика является частью реализации государственного суверенитета над управлением своими природными ресурсами. С этой должностью управление горнодобывающей промышленностью Freeport больше не основывается на договоре на выполнение работ, а на специальной лицензии на горнодобывающий бизнес, которая предоставляет владельцам бизнеса гарантии продления их лицензий, чтобы обеспечить уверенность участников горнодобывающего бизнеса в ведении горнодобывающего бизнеса в Индонезии.Ключевые Слова: Пересмотр; Freeport; Государственный суверенитет]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Member SJ Travel Pass Terhadap Perjanjian Baku Dalam Program Keanggotaan Khusus Jasa Angkutan Penerbangan (Studi Kasus SJ Travel Pass) ]]>
<![CDATA[Fathurian Ramadhan]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Siradj]]>;
<![CDATA[Maman Rahman Hakim]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i2.22229
<![CDATA[This study examines the validity and legality of the standard agreement in the SJ Travel Pass special membership program on flight transportation services, as well as the legal protection for disadvantaged members. This study uses normative legal research on statutory standards. Using library research, the adopted strategy is both statutory and case-based. Reading, evaluating, characterizing, and analyzing library resources was done to generate relevant papers. This study concludes that the SJ Travel Pass standard agreement will be electronic. The contract is void under Article 1320 of the Civil Code and Law 19 of 2016 amending Law 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions because it does not meet the objective requirements of Law 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, namely the inclusion of standard clauses prohibited under Article 18 section (1) letters g and f. The contract is void. Consumer protection compels Sriwijaya to compensate customers without criminal culpability or fines. The Indonesian Consumers Foundation has mediated (non-litigious) disputes. Consumers can fight for their rights by applying to the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency or Arbitration Institution, filing a legal case with the District Court, and/or reporting fraud and embezzlement.]]>
<![CDATA[SANKSI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN PENETAPAN HARGA (PRICE FIXING) PADA SEKTOR JASA PENGANGKUTAN UDARA (Analisis Putusan KPPU Nomor 15/KPPU-I/2019) ]]>
<![CDATA[Alya Nurfitriyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Siradj]]>;
<![CDATA[Indra Rahmatullah]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 6 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.21595
<![CDATA[This study discusses the sanctions imposed by the KPPU in the price fixing agreement and how the Commission Council considers the price fixing agreement. This research uses normative legal research, with the research approach used in this study using a statutory approach and a case approach and the data collection method in this research is library research. The results of this study are that the administrative sanctions imposed on the Reported Parties in this decision are only to notify the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in writing before taking any business actor policies that will affect the business competition map. The reported parties should be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of fines. However, due to the ratification of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, especially Article 48 and also Article 49 concerning additional penalties in this Law, it was removed. Then, according to Article 5 of Government Regulation Number 44 of 2021, especially in paragraph (1) letter c, the Commission Council in deciding this case considered a clear reason, namely the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. So, the Reported Parties in this case were only given administrative sanctions and they were not given. Then, in deciding the case, the Commission Council considered it from the philosophical, sociological and juridical aspects.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Kepailitan Akibat Pembatalan Homologasi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang ]]>
<![CDATA[Alifah Zhecarina Kadang]]>;
<![CDATA[Ipah Farihah]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Siradj]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 3 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i3.21420
<![CDATA[This study aims to evaluate the judge's legal reasoning in the judgment Number: 4/Pdt.Sus. Peace Cancellation/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Number 718K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019, as well as how the cancellation of the homologation of the postponement of debt payment obligations led to insolvency. Analysis of the matter between PT Arpeni Pratama Ocean Line Tbk and PT CIMB Niaga in their respective roles as debtor and creditor. Due to the debtor's negligence with the homologated peace document, the creditor petitions the Commercial Court to annul the peace agreement. At the level of the Commercial Court, the court denied the demand for cancellation. The Creditors file an appeal with the Supreme Court in response to the verdict of the Commercial Court Judge. The Supreme Court judge observed in his ruling that he had approved the creditor's motion to reject the reconciliation. This study combines a descriptive-analytical research technique in conjunction with a legal research strategy consisting of a normative juridical or statutory approach and qualitative analysis methodologies. Case research for Decision Number 4/Pdt.Sus.Cancellation of Peace/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Number 718K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019 revealed that the judge's legal considerations at the first level were in conflict with several Civil Code articles and the principle of balance in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Temporary Debt Payment Obligations. The judge of the Supreme Court who accepts the petition for peace annulment declares the debtor bankrupt with all legal consequences.]]>
<![CDATA[Judge's arguments in decisions involving Sharia economic disputes in the regional religious courts of Jakarta, 2015–2022. ]]>
<![CDATA[Faqih Zuhdi Rahman]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Siradj]]>;
<![CDATA[Asadurrahman Asadurrahman]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2024): In Press ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i1.35955
<![CDATA[Judges must be capable of settling sharia economic issues without departing from accepted sharia principles. When weighing each decision, the judge takes into account the DSN-MUI Fatwa, which serves as a manual and a mechanism for the implementation of sharia economic activities in Indonesia, as well as KHES, which serves as the primary legal framework for religious courts handling sharia economic disputes. This study intends to map the judges' arguments in sharia economic issues and explain how the National Sharia Council-Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI) Fatwa and the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) are applied in Religious Court rulings involving sharia economic disputes. A qualitative approach is applied in the study methodology, which is normative legal research. The study's findings demonstrate that the judges' arguments in sharia economic matters in the Jakarta Regional Religious Court jurisdiction reflect their own viewpoints. The judge's arguments in the five Religious Courts in the Jakarta region frequently reference the Civil Code for legal justifications. The DSN-MUI Fatwa and KHES must be applied as effectively as possible. The use of KHES is only used in specific articles, namely using Articles 36 and 38 of the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law and the DSN-MUI Fatwa, which is mostly used in matters of compensation or ta'widh or sanctions for customers who are unable to fulfill their obligations, according to an analysis of sharia economic case decisions at the Jakarta Regional Religious Court.]]>
<![CDATA[Law and Sovereignty of the State in the Renegotiation of Freeport Contracts in Papua ]]>
<![CDATA[Khamami Zada]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustolih Mustolih]]>;
<![CDATA[Diana Mutia Habibaty]]>;
<![CDATA[Lukman Hakim]]>;
<![CDATA[Desy Purwaningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Trini Diyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i2.21546
<![CDATA[The mineral and coal mines have long been managed by foreign contracts between governments and foreigners. The position threatens the state's sovereignty over the wealth of natural resources. The study was to analyze the renege-management of Indonesia's Freeport mines in Papua. Socio-legal methods were used to analyze the renegotiation of Indonesia's Freeport management. The study found that according to the principle of state mastery over natural resources as a common property of Indonesian people's prosperity as in article 33 verses (3) constitution of 1945, the Indonesian government officially took over its 51-percent share of Freeport. It is part of an expression of national sovereignty over the management of its natural resources. With this position, Freeport's mining management is no longer based on a contract of work, but a Special Mining Business License which provides guarantees to business holders to have their licenses extended to provide certainty to mining business actors in conducting mining business in Indonesia.Keywords: Renegotiation; Freeport; State Sovereignity Hukum dan Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Renegosiasi Kontrak Freeport Di Papua Abstrak Pertambangan mineral dan batubara selama ini dikelola pihak asing berdasarkan kontrak antara pemerintah dan pihak asing. Posisi ini sesungguhnya mengancam kedaulatan negara atas kekeyaaan sumberdaya alam. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis renegosiasi pengelolaan tambang PT Freeport Indonesia di Papua. Metode socio-legal digunakan untuk menganalisis renegosiasi pengelolaan tambang PT Freeport Indonesia. Studi ini menemukan bahwa berdasarkan prinsip penguasaan negara atas sumberdaya alam sebagai common property bangsa Indonesia untuk kemakmuran rakyat sebagaimana pasal 33 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Pemerintah Indonesia secara resmi mengambil alih saham PT. Freeport Indonesia sebesar 51 %. Kebijakan ini merupakan bagian dari perwujudan kedaulatan negara atas pengelolaan sumberdaya alamnya. Dengan posisi ini, pengelolaan tambang Freeport bukan lagi berdasarkan kontrak karya, melainkan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Khusus yang memberikan jaminan kepada pemegang usaha untuk diperpanjang izinnya unutk memberikan kepastian kepada pelaku usaha pertambangan dalam melakukan bisnis pertambangan di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Renegosiasi; Freeport; Kedaulatan Negara Закон и суверенитет государствапри пересмотре договоров Freeport в Папуа АннотацияДо настоящего времени управление добычей полезных ископаемых и угля осуществлялось иностранными сторонами на основании договоров между правительством и иностранными сторонами. Эта позиция фактически угрожает суверенитету государства над богатством природных ресурсов. Данное исследование направлено на анализ пересмотра условий руководства рудником компании Freeport Indonesia в Папуа. Социально-правовой метод был использован для анализа пересмотра условий руководства рудником компании Freeport Indonesia. Это исследование показало, что на основе принципа государственного контроля над природными ресурсами как общей собственностью индонезийского народа для процветания народа, как указано в пункте (3) статьи 33 Конституции 1945 года, правительство Индонезии официально приняло на себя акции из компании Freeport Indonesia на 51%. Эта политика является частью реализации государственного суверенитета над управлением своими природными ресурсами. С этой должностью управление горнодобывающей промышленностью Freeport больше не основывается на договоре на выполнение работ, а на специальной лицензии на горнодобывающий бизнес, которая предоставляет владельцам бизнеса гарантии продления их лицензий, чтобы обеспечить уверенность участников горнодобывающего бизнеса в ведении горнодобывающего бизнеса в Индонезии.Ключевые Слова: Пересмотр; Freeport; Государственный суверенитет]]>
