Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.235
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Mustolih Siradj
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH

 1 
Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencucian Uang Yang Dilakukan Oleh PT. First Anugerah Karya Wisata (Studi Kasus : Putusan Nomor : 3096 K/Pid.Sus/2018) Iga Ayu Mawarni; Asmawi Asmawi; Mustolih Siradj
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i3.16601

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa perampasan asset untuk negara dari PT First Anugerah Karya Wisata sudah sesuai dengan asas keadilan dan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku dan juga menjelaskan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan serta mendeskripsikan hakim dalam menginterpretasikan pasal-pasal yang digunakan. Dari segi jenis penelitian hukum, jenis Tipe penelitian yang digunakan dalam  penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif,  yaitu pendekatan  yang mengacu kepada norma-norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan-putusan  pengadilan serta norma-norma hukum yang terdapat  dalam masyarakat. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa apabila dilihat dari sisi korban tidak terpenuhinya rasa keadilan dalam putusan ini tidak juga ada kemanfaatan hukum yang terkandung dalam putusan ini. Mengingat sampai pada tingkat Kasasi, Hakim tetap menyatakan aset dirampas untuk negara yang sejatinya tidak ada sedikitpun kerugian negara yang dialami. Kata Kunci: Tindak Pidana, Penipuan, Pencucian Uang, Perampasan Aset.
Pengedaran Farmasi Ilegal Golongan Kosmetika Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen; Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Martapura No. 361/pid.sus/2017/pn.mtp Inayatul Mukaromah; Mustolih Sidradj
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i4.13905

Abstract

AbstractThe problem of this research is the presence of business actors who sell pharmaceuticals in the form of cosmetics which are unfit for circulation for almost two years. But in its consideration, the Panel of Judges disagreed with the actions taken by BPOM in practice that were deemed not in accordance with the duties and functions as they should, so the Judge considered that this matter was detrimental to the defendant. This research method uses qualitative research by using a normative-empirical research approach. The study also uses a law in books approach and an empirical approach. The results showed that in the perspective of the UUPK, the defendant violated Article 4, 7 and 8 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. BPOM's actions towards the defendant in the Martapura District Court's decision No. 361 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Mtp are in accordance with the main duties and functions stipulated in Article 4 of Presidential Regulation Number 80 Year 2017 concerning BPOM RI.Keywords: Distribution, Pharmacy, Illegal Cosmetics, Consumer Protection, Legal Certainty, BPOM RI 
Upaya Keberatan Atas Putusan Arbitrase Bpsk Jakarta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 (Studi Kasus Putusan Bpsk No. 099/Pts.A/Bpsk-Dki/Ii/2012) Riski Ananda; Mustolih Siradj
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i1.17080

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to ascertain consumer protection under the Jakarta BPSK Arbitration judgment through an examination of a car purchasing and selling case involving business actors PT. Nissan Motor Indonesia and their customer Ludmilla Arief. The purpose of this study is to examine the regulations governing advertising used by business actors to deceive customers. Additionally, it attempts to examine and compare the BPSK Arbitration ruling about consumer protection in the context of deceptive advertising. Through a law and case perspective, this study employs empirical legal research methods and literature. The findings indicated that the Arbitration Award's (BPSK) legal basis, namely Article 9 Paragraph (1) letter k and Article 10 of Law No. 8 of 1999, was consistent with the Consumer Protection Law's requirements. As a result, PT. Nissan Motor Indonesia is liable for consumer losses under Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Act.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Member SJ Travel Pass Terhadap Perjanjian Baku Dalam Program Keanggotaan Khusus Jasa Angkutan Penerbangan (Studi Kasus SJ Travel Pass) Fathurian Ramadhan; Mustolih Siradj; Maman Rahman Hakim
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i2.22229

Abstract

This study examines the validity and legality of the standard agreement in the SJ Travel Pass special membership program on flight transportation services, as well as the legal protection for disadvantaged members. This study uses normative legal research on statutory standards. Using library research, the adopted strategy is both statutory and case-based. Reading, evaluating, characterizing, and analyzing library resources was done to generate relevant papers. This study concludes that the SJ Travel Pass standard agreement will be electronic. The contract is void under Article 1320 of the Civil Code and Law 19 of 2016 amending Law 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions because it does not meet the objective requirements of Law 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, namely the inclusion of standard clauses prohibited under Article 18 section (1) letters g and f. The contract is void. Consumer protection compels Sriwijaya to compensate customers without criminal culpability or fines. The Indonesian Consumers Foundation has mediated (non-litigious) disputes. Consumers can fight for their rights by applying to the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency or Arbitration Institution, filing a legal case with the District Court, and/or reporting fraud and embezzlement.
SANKSI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN PENETAPAN HARGA (PRICE FIXING) PADA SEKTOR JASA PENGANGKUTAN UDARA (Analisis Putusan KPPU Nomor 15/KPPU-I/2019) Alya Nurfitriyah; Mustolih Siradj; Indra Rahmatullah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 6 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i6.21595

Abstract

This study discusses the sanctions imposed by the KPPU in the price fixing agreement and how the Commission Council considers the price fixing agreement. This research uses normative legal research, with the research approach used in this study using a statutory approach and a case approach and the data collection method in this research is library research. The results of this study are that the administrative sanctions imposed on the Reported Parties in this decision are only to notify the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in writing before taking any business actor policies that will affect the business competition map. The reported parties should be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of fines. However, due to the ratification of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, especially Article 48 and also Article 49 concerning additional penalties in this Law, it was removed. Then, according to Article 5 of Government Regulation Number 44 of 2021, especially in paragraph (1) letter c, the Commission Council in deciding this case considered a clear reason, namely the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. So, the Reported Parties in this case were only given administrative sanctions and they were not given. Then, in deciding the case, the Commission Council considered it from the philosophical, sociological and juridical aspects.
Tinjauan Yuridis Kepailitan Akibat Pembatalan Homologasi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Alifah Zhecarina Kadang; Ipah Farihah; Mustolih Siradj
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 4, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v4i3.21420

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the judge's legal reasoning in the judgment Number: 4/Pdt.Sus. Peace Cancellation/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Number 718K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019, as well as how the cancellation of the homologation of the postponement of debt payment obligations led to insolvency. Analysis of the matter between PT Arpeni Pratama Ocean Line Tbk and PT CIMB Niaga in their respective roles as debtor and creditor. Due to the debtor's negligence with the homologated peace document, the creditor petitions the Commercial Court to annul the peace agreement. At the level of the Commercial Court, the court denied the demand for cancellation. The Creditors file an appeal with the Supreme Court in response to the verdict of the Commercial Court Judge. The Supreme Court judge observed in his ruling that he had approved the creditor's motion to reject the reconciliation. This study combines a descriptive-analytical research technique in conjunction with a legal research strategy consisting of a normative juridical or statutory approach and qualitative analysis methodologies. Case research for Decision Number 4/Pdt.Sus.Cancellation of Peace/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Number 718K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019 revealed that the judge's legal considerations at the first level were in conflict with several Civil Code articles and the principle of balance in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Temporary Debt Payment Obligations. The judge of the Supreme Court who accepts the petition for peace annulment declares the debtor bankrupt with all legal consequences.
Co-Authors Alifah Zhecarina Kadang Alya Nurfitriyah Asadurrahman Asadurrahman Asmawi Asmawi Desy Purwaningsih Diana Mutia Habibaty Faqih Zuhdi Rahman Fathurian Ramadhan Iga Ayu Mawarni Inayatul Mukaromah Indra Rahmatullah, Indra Ipah Farihah Khamami Zada Lukman Hakim Maman Rahman Hakim Riski Ananda Trini Diyani