Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Journal Iuris Scientia
Fransiskus Litoama
Universitas Pamulang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM INVESTASI PERDAGANGAN BERJANGKA KOMODITI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 10 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PERDAGANGAN BERJANGKA KOMODITI Fransiskus Litoama
Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 1 (2018): SURYA KENCANA SATU
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (359.808 KB) | DOI: 10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v9i1.1176

Abstract

ABSTRAKPembangunan Nasional bertujuan mewujudkan masyarakat adil dan makmur berdasarkan Pancasila dan Undang-undang Dasar 1945. Hal ini dilakukan melalui praktek perekonomian yang mandiri dan andal dengan prasarana perdagangan yang dapat menunjang pertumbuhan ekonomi itu sendiri. Kepastian hukum investasi perdagangan berjangka komoditi harus menjamin perkembangan ekonomi berkelanjutan. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan berbasis data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukan pertama, Mekanisme Penandatanganan Perjanjian Pemberian Amanat Sebagai Suatu Bentuk Perjanjian Investasi Dalam Dokumen  Pembukaan Rekening Transaksi Berdasarkan tidak dipahami secara hukum oleh kontraktan, kedua, Kepastian Hukum Investasi Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi Dalam Perjanjian Pemberian Amanat sebagai suatu bentuk perjanjian investasi belum sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan.Kata Kunci : Kepastian Hukum, Investasi Perdagangan Berjangka, Komoditi.
REKONSTRUKSI ASAS PUBLISITAS DAN KEWAJIBAN ADMINISTRATIF KURATOR DALAM HUKUM KEPAILITAN: ANALISIS PUTUSAN MK NO. 74/PUU-XXIV/2026 Maddenleo T Siagian; Purgito Purgito; Fransiskus Litoama
JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA
Publisher : Yayasan Merassa Indonesia Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62263/

Abstract

Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 74/PUU-XXIV/2026 dated April 29, 2026 introduces a significant shift in the interpretation of Article 74 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), particularly by expanding the procedural obligations of trustees (curators) in submitting bankruptcy reports. The Court held that curators are not only required to file reports at the Commercial Court Registry, but must also deliver copies of such reports directly to debtors and creditors through various communication channels. This study aims to critically examine the legal and practical implications of this expanded interpretation on the principles of efficiency, effectiveness, and legal certainty within the Indonesian bankruptcy system. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, focusing on the Constitutional Court decision. The findings indicate that the expanded administrative obligations imposed on curators may increase bankruptcy costs, create excessive administrative burdens, and reduce the value of the bankruptcy estate available for distribution to creditors. In addition, the ruling raises potential legal uncertainty regarding the validity and evidentiary status of electronically delivered notifications. The decision also reflects elements of judicial activism, as it extends into technical regulatory matters that arguably fall within the competence of the legislature or judicial administrative regulators. Therefore, strengthening transparency in bankruptcy proceedings would be more appropriately achieved through the optimization of integrated digital court information systems rather than by expanding individual notification duties imposed on curators.
Co-Authors Maddenleo T Siagian Purgito Purgito