Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : English Language and Literature

THE COMPARISON OF TABOO WORDS AND SWEARWORDS USED BY MEN AND WOMEN OF SUKU ANAK DALAM IN DESA BALAI RAJO Megika Fajri; Hermawati Syarif; Fitrawati Fitrawati
English Language and Literature Vol 7, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/ell.v7i4.101914

Abstract

The aims of this research is to describe the types of taboo words and types and functions of swearwords used by men and women of Suku Anak Dalam, the differences of swearwords used by men and women. The type of this research was a descriptive qualitative research. The data were the taboo words and swearwords used by the informants. The informants were (men and women) of Suku Anak Dalam. The data were collected by using interview method with stimulation technique. It is found there are five types of taboo words used by men. Meanwhile, there two types of taboo words used by women. It is also found there are six types of swearwords used by men. They are swearwords from sex organs, minor (animals and diseases), mother type, body function, scatology and religious. Meanwhile, swearwords used by women are only three. They are sex organ, minor (animal) and religious. Swearwords have various functions in Suku Anak Dalam.  For men, there are three functions of swearwords, expletive, abusive, and humoristic. Meanwhile, for women there are two functions of swearwords, abusive and expletive. In short, men have more various types of taboo words and swearwords than women. Men mostly use the type of sex organs for the taboo words and swearwords, ruder and impolite than women’s. While, women have fewer types of taboo words and swearwords. Men use swearwords to abuse and mostly to express anger. Meanwhile women use abusive function to express anger and disappointment.
LANGUAGE STYLE BETWEEN PUBLIC SPEAKERS IN PUBLIC SPEAKING PERFORMANCES Rizky Satria; Hamzah Hamzah; Fitrawati Fitrawati
English Language and Literature Vol 7, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/ell.v7i4.101911

Abstract

Although there have been many studies show that different style in using language, there are very few studies that compare language style in public speaking through three levels of metafunction. This study aims to compare the differences and the similarities between two public speakers in 1) the level of ideational metafunction, 2) the level of interpersonal metafunction, and 3) the level of textual metafunction. This is comparative study within qualitative approach. The results of the study show that they share three similarities and two differences in the level of ideational metafunction. Then, there are six similarities and four differences in the interpersonal level. Meanwhile, there are four similarities and two differences found for textual metafunction. The conclusion obtained from the findings is that they are more similar rather than different and the differences in style are affected by the differences in cultural background of the speakers which are represented through speech and lead to the different ways of producing structure of clauses and selection of words in the three levels of metafunction.