Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI PEMBANGUNAN SKYBRIDGE DI KOTA SURAKARTA Mahardhika Mulya Adi Pamungkas; Wahyu Nurharjadmo
Jurnal Litbang Sukowati : Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Vol. 3 No. 1, November 2019
Publisher : Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kabupaten Sragen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (389.766 KB) | DOI: 10.32630/sukowati.v3i1.63

Abstract

This study aims to determine the processes and factors that influence the implementation of skybridge development in Surakarta City. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The method of data collection uses interview and documentation, the process of data validity is done by source and technique triangulation. The results of this study concluded that the process of implementing skybridge development in Surakarta City was divided into three stages, namely the stage of organizing, interpreting, and application. There are supporting factors for implementation such as the Basic Size Factors and Policy Objectives; Sources of Factors: Communication Factors in aspects of transmission, aspects of clarity, aspects of consistency, aspects of accuracy in implementers, and directly affected communities; Factors Bureaucratic structures on aspects of organizational structure, aspects of work coordination flow, and aspects of standard operating procedures; Factors of Economic, Social and Political Conditions on aspects of the general public's opinion on policy; and the Implementing Tendency Factor. In addition there are also inhibiting factors such as the Communication Factor in the aspect of accuracy in people who are not directly affected; Factors of Bureaucratic Structure on aspects of fragmentation; Factors of Economic, Social and Political Conditions on the aspects of the influence of social conditions.
Mengawal Risiko untuk Akuntabilitas: Literasi Arsip sebagai Instrumen Administrasi Publik Berkelanjutan Rutina Dwi Wahyunengseh; Didik Gunawan Suharto; Sudarmo Sudarmo; Faizatul Ansoriyah; Wahyu Nurharjadmo; Ryza Dani Pratiwi; Agusniar Rizka Luthfia
Dharma Sevanam : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Juny 2026
Publisher : IAHN Gde Pudja Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53977/sjpkm.v5i1.3809

Abstract

This article discusses the strengthening of archive governance in regional apparatus organizations in Magelang City as part of the Community Service (PkM) program of Sebelas Maret University in collaboration with the Magelang City Library and Archives Office. Although Magelang City has achieved an A grade in archival supervision from the National Archives of the Republic of Indonesia, various challenges are still found, such as the preparation of dynamic archive lists that are not optimal, not all Regional Apparatus have submitted static archives, and the integration of digital systems in most OPDs is not optimal. In addition, the application of the SRIKANDI (Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi/ Integrated Dynamic Archiving Information System) application is also uneven and has not been used optimally as an institutional information management tool. This service activity is carried out through a collaborative and participatory approach, with strategies in the form of archival culture seminars, focused discussions with heads of regional apparatus and department secretaries, and a review of the results of archival supervision audits. The main focus of this activity is to build institutional awareness, formulate steps to mitigate the risk of losing archives, and increase human resource capacity in digital-based archive management. The results of the activity showed an increase in the apparatus' understanding of the archive cycle and the development of recommendations for saving institutional archives. This activity strengthens the role of the archives office as a node to save organizational memory while bridging the gap between national policy and archive management practices at the regional level. The practical implication of this activity is the increased readiness of the regional bureaucracy in facing digital transformation and demands for sustainable public accountability in the field of archives.