Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Media of Law and Sharia
Totok Dwi Diantoro
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
DINAMIKA KEBIJAKAN RESOLUSI KONFLIK TENURIAL KAWASAN HUTAN ERA JOKO WIDODO Diantoro, Totok Dwi
Media of Law and Sharia Vol 1, No 4 (2020): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Muhamadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (603.305 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/mls.v1i4.10272

Abstract

Konflik tenurial masih banyak terjadi di berbagai wilayah di Indonesia. Tercatat 9.124 konflik pertanahan terjadi pada tahun 2015-2019 dalam beberapa sektor, yaitu perkebunan, transmigrasi, dan kawasan hutan. Pemerintah berupaya menekan laju pertumbuhan konflik tenurial melalui produk hukum Peraturan Presiden dan Peraturan Menteri. Namun, dalam kurun waktu lima tahun masa pemerintahan Joko Widodo periode pertama, persoalan konflik tenurial tak kunjung terselesaikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana dinamika kebijakan resolusi konflik tenurial khususnya pada kawasan hutan di era Joko Widodo. Penelitian ini menilai upaya intervensi kebijakan bagi penyelesaian akar permasalahan atau sumber konflik tenurial.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembentukan peraturan-peraturan terkait resolusi konflik tenurial di era Joko Widodo tidak menunjukkan perkembangan signifikan ke arah yang lebih baik. Padahal, awalnya berbagai peraturan yang telah ada memberikan harapan cukup positif terhadap penyelesaian konflik tenurial pada kawasan hutan. Namun, selepas itu kebijakan-kebijakan lanjutan yang dilakukan pemerintah justru menunjukkan hasil yang stagnan. Peraturan-peraturan yang dibutuhkan sebagai dasar penyelesaikan konflik tenurial tidak cukup memadai. Tumpang tindih pengaturan juga terjadi, karena persoalan konflik tenurial bersifat lintas sektor.
PERAMBAHAN KAWASAN HUTAN PADA KONSERVASI TAMAN NASIONAL (STUDI KASUS TAMAN NASIONAL TESSO NILO, RIAU) Totok Dwi Diantoro
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 23, No 3 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2683.322 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16176

Abstract

By 2006, Indonesia has confirmed at least 50 national parks. Tesso Nilo National Park which was established in 2004 suffered encroachment of forest areas through land use conversion. Until 2009, it has degraded more than 30% of the national park. There should be a comprehensive choice of settlement mechanism. Hingga tahun 2006, Indonesia setidaknya telah mengukuhkan 50 taman nasional. Taman Nasional Tesso Nilo yang dikukuhkan pada tahun 2004 mengalami perambahan kawasan hutan melalui konversi peruntukan lahan. Hingga tahun 2009 setidaknya telah mendegradasi lebih dari 30% luas kawasan taman nasional. Harus ada pilihan mekanisme penyelesaian yang komprehensif.
A Critical Review of the Actualization of the Right to Control by the State Doctrine in the Policy on Revocation of Forest Area Permits/Concessions Diantoro, Totok Dwi
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 7, Nomor 2, Tahun 2025
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i2.71-93

Abstract

The Right to Control by the State (Hak Menguasai Negara or HMN) is a doctrine derived from Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which asserts that the land, water, and natural resources contained therein shall be controlled by the state for the greatest benefit of the people. In its decision, the Constitutional Court explained that the phrase "controlled by the state" reflects political democracy, whereby citizens entrust their sovereignty to the government in the management of natural resources.In exercising its authority, the government issued the Decree of the Minister of Environment and Forestry No. 01/2022 concerning the Revocation of Forest Area Concession Permits. This decree raised issues regarding the boundaries of authority between the forestry and land regimes. The purpose of this study is to examine how the doctrine of HMN is implemented in Decree No. 01/2022.This research employs a normative legal approach, analyzing the text of laws and regulations, court decisions, and legal doctrines. The findings reveal that, aside from the fact that Decree No. 01/2022 does not genuinely revoke problematic forest area permits, its administrative function (bestuurdaad) remains far from definitive and final. From the perspective of policy function (beleid), the decree even intervenes in the management of former forest areas, thereby exceeding its jurisdiction. However, even with this intervention, there is no evident concrete commitment to prioritize the interests of the people.The conclusion drawn from this study is that Decree No. 01/2022, as a manifestation of the HMN doctrine, still falls short of being oriented toward the greatest prosperity of the people.
Reformulation of the compensation mechanism for fulfilling the rights of victims of corruption in Indonesia Halili, Hasrul; Diantoro, Totok Dwi; Mochtar, Zainal Arifin
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v11i1.1379

Abstract

Corruption, as a criminal act, causes victims. Identifying victims of corruption is not straightforward, as they can be direct or indirect. Victims of corruption include the state, groups, and individuals in society. This distinction characterizes corruption victims differently from victims of other crimes. Law enforcement efforts against corruption mainly focus on punishing perpetrators. The recovery of state losses is usually limited to compensation payments, which cover the proceeds of crime received by the perpetrator, rather than the full amount of the loss suffered by the state. Meanwhile, victims who are groups and individuals within society are often overlooked in the legal system. To date, Indonesia has not implemented a practice of compensating communities—both groups and individuals—who are victims of corruption. This research is a juridical-normative study. It uses both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The statutory approach examines the mechanism for compensating corruption victims in the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and other relevant laws and regulations. The conceptual approach explores the idea of victim recovery in corruption cases. The study finds that Indonesian law currently offers three ways for victims of corruption to seek compensation: civil lawsuits, joining civil suits with criminal cases, and restitution. However, existing regulations lack a clear and specific mechanism to ensure victims' rights are fully met. A dedicated compensation mechanism, aligned with the nature of corruption victims and their losses, is necessary in the Draft Law on Corruption (RUU Tipikor).
Co-Authors Hasrul Halili Zainal Arifin Mochtar