Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Hasrul Halili
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Serta Relevansinya terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formal Tata Wijayanta; Sandra Dini Febri Aristya; Kunthoro Basuki; Ms. Herliana; Hasrul Halili; RB. Sutanto; Retno Supartinah
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 22, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (380.723 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16243

Abstract

The conception of “formal truth” in civil procedure is about to become a debate among academicians and practitioners because it is deemed no longer relevant to achieve justice. Modern paradigm begins to consider that this concept should be given similar interpretation with material truth theory adhered by criminal procedure. Konsep kebenaran formal dalam acara perdata mulai menjadi perdebatan di antara para akademisi dan praktisi karena dianggap sudah tidak lagi relevan dan jauh dari rasa keadilan. Paradigma saat ini mesti mulai mempertimbangkan bahwa konsep kebenaran formal harus diberi pengertian yang sama dengan konsep kebenaran material dalam acara pidana.
Tingkat Integritas Instansi Pelayanan BPN dan Samsat di Provinsi DIY Zainal Arifin Mochtar; Hasrul Halili
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 21, No 3 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (436.837 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16282

Abstract

This research questions the standard operational procedures applied in Samsat and BPN Yogyakarta. Result shows how the integrity level of these institutions is potential to be enhanced by opening wide access of information and by eradicating tipping and illegal payment. Improvement of reward and punishment system must also be done.  Fokus penelitian ini adalah prosedur operasional standar yang digunakan oleh Samsat dan BPN Yogyakarta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat integritas kedua institusi ini berpotensi untuk dikembangkan dengan cara membuka keran informasi dan mengeliminasi budaya tips dan pungutan liar serta memperbaiki sistem reward and punishment.
Reformulation of the compensation mechanism for fulfilling the rights of victims of corruption in Indonesia Halili, Hasrul; Diantoro, Totok Dwi; Mochtar, Zainal Arifin
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v11i1.1379

Abstract

Corruption, as a criminal act, causes victims. Identifying victims of corruption is not straightforward, as they can be direct or indirect. Victims of corruption include the state, groups, and individuals in society. This distinction characterizes corruption victims differently from victims of other crimes. Law enforcement efforts against corruption mainly focus on punishing perpetrators. The recovery of state losses is usually limited to compensation payments, which cover the proceeds of crime received by the perpetrator, rather than the full amount of the loss suffered by the state. Meanwhile, victims who are groups and individuals within society are often overlooked in the legal system. To date, Indonesia has not implemented a practice of compensating communities—both groups and individuals—who are victims of corruption. This research is a juridical-normative study. It uses both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The statutory approach examines the mechanism for compensating corruption victims in the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and other relevant laws and regulations. The conceptual approach explores the idea of victim recovery in corruption cases. The study finds that Indonesian law currently offers three ways for victims of corruption to seek compensation: civil lawsuits, joining civil suits with criminal cases, and restitution. However, existing regulations lack a clear and specific mechanism to ensure victims' rights are fully met. A dedicated compensation mechanism, aligned with the nature of corruption victims and their losses, is necessary in the Draft Law on Corruption (RUU Tipikor).
Co-Authors Kunthoro Basuki Ms. Herliana RB. Sutanto Retno Supartinah Sandra Dini Febri Aristya Tata Wijayanta Totok Dwi Diantoro Zainal Arifin Mochtar