Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KEPAILITAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI BIDANG USAHA E – COMMERCE Muhammad Syahri Ramadhan; Muhammad Syaifuddin; Theta Murty; Neisa Angrum Adisti; M Zainul Arifin; Rizka Nurliyantika; M Ardian Nugraha; Conie Pania Putri
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 9, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2 NOVEMBER 2020
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v9i2.843

Abstract

Pada dasarnya perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang e – commerce ini sama seperti perusahaan yang kegiatan bisnisnya masih menggunakan cara – cara konvensional. Di samping itu perusahaan tersebut juga membutuhkan dana untuk melaksanakan kegiatan operasional perusahaan itu sendiri. Perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang e – commerce meskipun kegiatan biaya yang dikeluarkan untuk kegiatan bisnisnya tidak sebesar dengan perusahaan konvensional, namun perusahaan tersebut tetap saja membutuhkan anggaran untuk menjamin kelangsungan bisnis tersebut. Perusahaan yang bergerak bidang e – commerce tentunya selain mengandalkan kepada modal dasar yang dimiliki, namun perusahaan  pasti juga bergantung kepada sumber anggaran lainnya yaitu melalui kegiatan utang. Perusahaan apabila memanfaatkan pola utang ini, ada kemungkinan perusahaan di bidang e – commerce tersebut akan dapat dipailitkan jika ternyata perusahaan tersebut memenuhi syarat untuk dipailitkan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Masalah selanjutnya tentunya mengenai mekanisme penentuan harta kekayaan perusahaan di bidang e-commerce tersebut untuk dijadikan boedel/harta pailit. Hal ini mengingat aset perusahaan di bidang e-commerce selain berupa benda yang berwujud seperti gedung kantor, uang, kendaraan perusahaan dan semcamnya. Di sisi lain perusahaan juga mempunyai aset dalam bentuk yang tidak berwujud yaitu aplikasi sistem e-commerce itu sendiri.
Doctor's Legal Protection in Health Services for Covid-19 Patients Helena Primadianti Sulistyaningrum; Dian Afrilia; Theta Murty
International Journal of Research in Community Services Vol 3, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Research Collaboration Community (RCC)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46336/ijrcs.v3i1.181

Abstract

Doctors as medical workers are at the forefront of health services for Covid-19 patients. During the pandemic, doctor is the profession that has the highest risk in handling Covid-19 patients. In this case, it is appropriate if doctors get legal protection in carrying out their profession. So, what is the actual form of legal protection that doctors have received so far in handling Covid-19 patients? Have the existing regulations accommodated this protection?. The method of research which used in this research was normatif by examining the law which is conceptualized as a norm or rule that applied in society, and becomes a reference for everyone's behavior. The results of the study indicated that there were preventive and repressive measures which were as means of legal protection for doctors during Pandemic. Preventive efforts can be interpreted as steps or ways that can be taken to prevent an event that has legal consequences in the form of fulfilling obligations as a doctor, namely by carrying out the profession in accordance with professional standard, professional service standard, and standard operating procedures, completing administration in medical practice such as informed consent. and medical records, getting vaccines, providing incentives. While repressive efforts are defined as steps or method which taken if an event that results in law has occurred in the form of providing compensation to doctors who died, giving awards for services, bearing medical expenses for exposed doctors, and prosecution for criminal acts towards people who do not orderly implement health protocols. The legal protection of medical workers in handling Covid-19 is evident in the fact that these medical workers have received legal protection in the form of supervision and guidance carried out by the Central Government, Regional Government or their Work Agencies. It shows that existing regulations have accommodated legal protection for doctors during the Covid-19 pandemic.