Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat

KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM KERANGKA POLITIK HUKUM AGRARIA NASIONAL Widyarini Indriasti Wardani
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 15, No 2 (2018): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (121.721 KB) | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v15i2.684

Abstract

The development of ownership of land rights in Indonesia develops in line with the developments of the State of Indonesia itself. In this case includes four periods that each period has a specificity related to the political history of the nation. The period is the period of the Kingdom period, the period of the nation's occupation period foreigners namely the Netherlands and Japan, the period of Independence, and the period after the release of Law No. 5/1960 (Basic Agrarian Law). With the enactment of UUPA (National Agrarian Law), the ownership of land rights in Indonesia only differentiates ownership of land rights for Indonesian citizens and for foreign nationals by recognizing the rights of individual land that is Property rights, Building Use Rights, Usage Rights, use rights and the right to lease and title to communal land that is ulayat right (inherited from customary law).
PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM (TELAAH TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM) Widyarini Indriasti Wardani
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (508.543 KB) | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v10i2.334

Abstract

The regulation of land procurement for development in the public interest has established since the Dutch colonial administration. Its laws and regulationsundergo many changes based on the government political laws in the land sector. Law Number2 of 2012 on land procurement for development in the public interest has accommodated various public interests among others included several principles of public interest objectives to minimize any conflicts which caused by the decision to take citizens' rights ofland for public use. Other thingswhichregulated are the Implementation of Land Procurement by Land Agency (BPN), Determination of Compensation is not based on the Tax Object Sales Value (NJOP), but more emphasis on the agreement of the parties, namely the government or the agency which require land with the right to the land.
RAHASIA DAGANG SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DAN PENGATURANNYA DI INDONESIA Widyarini Indriasti Wardani
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 9, No 1 (2011): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (72.143 KB) | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v9i1.408

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 7 of 1994 on Ratification of Agreement Establishing of The World Trade Organization (Agreement of Establishing the World Trade Organization) brings the consequence that all provisions stipulated in the WTO must be complied with and implemented by Indonesia. In the WTO, GATT and TRIPS intellectual property rights protection is an important factor, and one of them is about Trade Secret. Setting these trade secrets contained in Law No. 30 year 2000 on Trade Secrets. This trade secret involves any information that must be kept from general population and have high economic value. In the practice of law, trade secret case occured in the case of Cohen vs. Lindenbaum about bribery to obtain information.
PROSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH BAGI WARGANEGARA ASING DI INDONESIA Widyarini Indriasti W
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 12, No 1 (2014): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (134.621 KB) | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v12i1.339

Abstract

The regulation of land ownership had already existed and stipulated in the UUPA. Article 42 of UUPA regulate the land ownership stipulation for foreigners, i.e. foreigners can only have use rights and leasehold. Government Regulation No. 41 of 1996 stipulates that the use rights for foreigners may occur on State Land, Properties Land and land management rights. The regulation of land rights for foreigners in Indonesia stipulated in Government Regulation No.41 of 1996 on Live Home or Residential Ownership by Foreigners domiciled in Indonesia. Law No. 1 of 2011 on Housing and Settlement Zone, which in Article 52 stipulated that foreigners could inhabit or occupy the home by rights of leases or rights of use. Government Regulation No. 41 of 1996 intended to provide the possibility of legal certainty for foreigners to have a house or dwelling which is located in Indonesia, however, the implementation has not been able to provide a clear legal for foreign citizen in related with property investment in Indonesia, as well as the emergence of smuggling law of land by foreigners which cannot be handled due to the lack of oversight and follow-up sanctions.
AKIBAT HUKUM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI ATAS TANAH YANG BERSTATUS KEPEMILIKAN ASET BEKAS MILIK ASING/TIONGHOA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 806 PK/Pdt/2017 Sulistiorini, Sherly; Wardani, Widyarini Indriasti
Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 23, No 1 (2025): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v23i1.6408

Abstract

Pada tahun 1967, aset Perkumpulan THHK dan Hok Siang Kong diambil alih negara sebagai Aset Bekas Milik Asing/Tionghoa dan menjadi Barang Milik Daerah. Aset yang disengketakan diberikan kepada Tergugat I-VI berdasarkan SK Penguasa Dwikora Daerah Jatim No. KEP 06/2/1967 tanggal 11 Februari 1967, dan diserahkan oleh Kementerian Keuangan kepada Pemkot Mojokerto pada 25 Januari 2011. Tahun 1990, aset tersebut diperjualbelikan dengan status tanah HGB No. 96 dan Hak Pakai, meskipun masa berlakunya telah habis sejak September 1980. Penggugat mengajukan gugatan di Pengadilan Negeri Mojokerto pada 2013 hingga Peninjauan Kembali pada 2017. Rumusan masalah yang diangkat meliputi: 1). Bagaimana Status aset yang berupa tanah atas kepemilikan aset bekas asing/tionghoa yang termasuk dalam organisasi Esklusif Rasial; 2). Bagaimana dasar pertimbangan hakim terhadap kasus jual beli atas tanah yang berstatus kepemilikan Aset Bekas Milik Asing/Tionghoa; 3). Apa akibat hukum dari kasus jual beli atas tanah yang berstatus kepemilikan Aset Bekas Milik Asing/Tionghoa. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan pendekatan yuridis normative,penelitian mempergunakan data sekunder dalam bentuk bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini: 1) status aset berupa tanah bekas milik asing/Tionghoa yang termasuk dalam organisasi eksklusif rasial telah ditetapkan sebagai tanah negara dan diserahkan kepada Pemerintah Kota Mojokerto, sebagaimana ditegaskan dalam Keputusan Menteri Keuangan tahun 2011; 2)  Mahkamah Agung dalam peninjauan kembali tidak menemukan kekeliruan yang nyata dalam putusan kasasi. Oleh karena itu, pertimbangan yang diajukan oleh Pemohon Peninjauan Kembali dianggap tidak beralasan. Hak atas tanah objek sengketa telah berakhir sejak 23 September 1980. Oleh karena itu, jual beli yang dilakukan setelah tanggal tersebut dianggap cacat hukum karena pihak penjual tidak memiliki hak untuk mengalihkan tanah tersebut. 3) Akibat hukum terhadap Status Jual Beli Aset Bekas Milik Asing/Tionghoa Mahkamah Agung berpendapat bahwa tanah sengketa telah ditetapkan sebagai barang milik Negara berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Keuangan dan SK Penguasa Pelaksana Dwikora Daerah Jawa Timur sebagai Aset Bekas Milik Asing/Tionghoa, sehingga hak atas tanah tidak dapat dialihkan melalui jual beli