Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

CHARACTERISTICS WANPRESTASI AND ONRECHTMATIGE DAADAND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAW SURYOUTOMO, MARKUS
UNTAG Law Review Vol 4, No 1 (2020): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Onrechtmatigedaad and wanprestasi claims always rely on a contractual relationship between parties, giving birth to legal rights and obligations. Rights and obligations here are manifested by an achievement. When an achievement is not fulfilled or carried out in accordance with the contents of the agreement, it is called a default. While the act of violating the law the starting point of the lawsuit is the interests of certain parties who are harmed by the actions of other parties, even though between the parties there is nocontractual civil law relationship. In this case, the basis for the lawsuit is sufficient to prove whether the perpetrator's actions have actually harmed the other party. In other words, filing a lawsuit in violation of the law is solely oriented to the consequences caused by other parties experiencing losses. Petitum Lawsuit Defaults the plaintiff's demands in the form of: Granting the plaintiff's claim; Stating the Defendant has a Default, Punishing the Defendant to return the Principal, Interest and Profits to be obtained. In a Lawsuit for Violating the Plaintiff's Lawsuit; Stating the Defendant has committed an illegal act; Punish Defendant to pay compensation in the form of Material Compensation and Moriel Compensation. the merging of Unlawful Acts with default in one claim violates the procedural code of conduct because both must be resolved separately

ESSENSI GANTI RUGI IMMATERIEL DALAM PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM MENURUT PUTUSAN HAKIM PERDATA INONESIA Markus Suryoutomo
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Legal findings by judges in interpreting the meaning of the text of the Act can function to realize and provide protection for the community of justice seekers, National legislation and its conclusions in the form of court decisions are reported to be open to various studies and deconstructive criticism that carried out through various social movements that care about the law, so that national law can function as one of the forces to mobilize the lives of new Indonesian people who are able to act responsively for the public interest. From this definition the obligation of the Judge to uphold justice comes from its authority, namely the Judicial Discretion policy. In the event that the judge grants Maternity compensation to the Law Breaking Lawsuits, insofar as it has fulfilled the Elements of Article 1365 of the Civil Code, which brings the legal consequences the judge can grant Immaterial compensation based on found

PENEMUAN HUKUM (RECHTSVINDING) HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PERDATA SEBAGAI ASPEK MENGISI KEKOSONGAN HUKUM Markus Suryoutomo; Mahmuda Pancawisma Febriharini
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 18, No 1 (2020): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Interpreting a legal rule is an effort to find the meaning of the legal rule, which means distilling or drawing out and displaying it to the surface of the rule of law or the meaning of law that is contained or hidden in the legal rule concerned. Regarding the method or method to find the rule of law, in legal studies various interpretation methods have been developed, including grammatical, historical, systematical, teleological and sociological methods. Regarding the methods there is no stipulation on hierarchical order. Yet it is not impossible that these methods produce different interpretations. However, hermeneutic studies show that all methods need to be involved proportionally in relation to one another whenever interpreting a rule of law.

CHARACTERISTICS WANPRESTASI AND ONRECHTMATIGE DAADAND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAW MARKUS SURYOUTOMO
UNTAG Law Review Vol 4, No 1 (2020): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Onrechtmatigedaad and wanprestasi claims always rely on a contractual relationship between parties, giving birth to legal rights and obligations. Rights and obligations here are manifested by an achievement. When an achievement is not fulfilled or carried out in accordance with the contents of the agreement, it is called a default. While the act of violating the law the starting point of the lawsuit is the interests of certain parties who are harmed by the actions of other parties, even though between the parties there is nocontractual civil law relationship. In this case, the basis for the lawsuit is sufficient to prove whether the perpetrator's actions have actually harmed the other party. In other words, filing a lawsuit in violation of the law is solely oriented to the consequences caused by other parties experiencing losses. Petitum Lawsuit Defaults the plaintiff's demands in the form of: Granting the plaintiff's claim; Stating the Defendant has a Default, Punishing the Defendant to return the Principal, Interest and Profits to be obtained. In a Lawsuit for Violating the Plaintiff's Lawsuit; Stating the Defendant has committed an illegal act; Punish Defendant to pay compensation in the form of Material Compensation and Moriel Compensation. the merging of Unlawful Acts with default in one claim violates the procedural code of conduct because both must be resolved separately

IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PARATE EXECUTIE ATAS JAMINAN FIDUSIA: (Uji Model Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia) Markus Suryoutomo Ahmad Hendroyono Siti Maryam
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 43, No 4 (2014): Masalah-Masalah Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

This research is purposed to measure the Fiduciary Parate Execution Model (FPEM) in solving concrete events based on analogy. The problems include: 1) the implementation of FPEM; 2) the obstacles in testing of FPEM; and 3) the forming of regulation as a construction to overcome the obstacles of FPEM. The method of this research is normative legal approach armed with system of self explanatory which a norm is a rule or an authoritative standard or what law ought to be. The result of FPEM is a recommendation in which contains the prescriptive value i.e the forming of regulation on FPEM. Keywords: Parate Execution, Fiduciary Security, Self-Explanatory. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur pelaksanaan Model Parate Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (MPEJF) dalam memecahkan peristiwa konkret berdasarkan analogi. Permasalahannya meliputi: 1) Implementasi MPEJF; 2) Kendala pengujian MPEJF; dan 3) Pembentukan peraturan sebagai konstruksi ideal untuk mengatasi kendala MPEJF. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode pendekatan normatif yang didukung oleh sistem“self-explanatory” dimana suatu norma adalah suatu aturan atau ukuran bersifat mengikat atau hukum yang seharusnya. Hasil dari MPEJF bersifat rekomendasi atau preskriptif yaitu bentuk rancangan regulasi tentang parate EJF. Kata Kunci : Parate Eksekusi, Jaminan Fidusia, Self-Explanatory.

Koherensi Putusan Hakim Dalam Pembuktian Ganti Rugi Imateriel Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Markus Suryoutomo; Siti Mariyam; Adhi Putra Satria
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2022
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v4i1.139-144

Rumusan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata telah menormakan perbuatan melawan hukum. Norma tersebut mengatur pula secara limitatif asas hukum penggantian kerugian yang bersifat wajib. Bahkan, dalam berbagai perkara di pengadilan, seringkali hakim secara ex-officio (kewenangan hakim dalam jabatannya), memberikan dan menetapkan penggantian kerugian (schade vergoeding) meskipun pihak korban tidak menuntutnya. Ganti kerugian atas gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam KUHPerdata hanya mengatur kerugian materiel akan tetapi tidak mengatur ganti kerugian imateriel. Kerugian materiel (materiële schadevergoeding) merupakan kerugian bersifat wujud yang dapat dinilai dengan uang. Kajian normatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis koherensi putusan hakim dalam pembuktian ganti rugi imateriel perbuatan melawan hukum. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Kajian ini menunjukan pemberian ganti kerugian materiil dapat diberikan oleh hakim dengan bukti-bukti kerugian yang diderita. Kerugian imateriel (immateriële schadevergoeding) berupa segala sesuatu yang bersifat non-materi yang jumlahnya tidak dapat diperhitungkan secara matematis. Syaratnya adalah bahwa jumlah ganti-rugi tersebut haruslah wajar. Pemberian ganti kerugian imateriel dapat dikabulkan oleh hakim berdasarkan kebijaksanaannya dengan prinsip ex aequo et bono (naar een goede justitie rechtdoen).

TINJAUAN HUKUM KESEHATAN PEMASANGAN VENEER DI INDONESIA Sumartini Dewi; Markus Suryoutomo
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 20, No 1 (2022): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Aesthetic dental care can be done in various ways, nowadays the most popular dental treatment is by applying veneers to the teeth. Even so, many people still do not understand that veneer treatment is the authority of dentists. This study aims to determine the regulation of veneer installation in positive law in Indonesia and the application of the law to violations of authority in veneer installation in Indonesia. The result of the research is that although it does not specifically regulate the veneer method, based on the Dentist Competency Standards, Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice has become a positive legal arrangement inIndonesia which becomes the legal umbrella for all forms of general medical practice and dentistry. The application of the law against violations of authority in veneer installation should be able to include elements of a more complex crime in several positive legal regulations in Indonesia. This is intended so that the public can learn about the powers of medical treatment that can only be carried out by medical personnel or doctors or dentists.

The Making of Law in Indonesia: A Criticism and Evaluation of The Practise of Legislative Function in The House of Representatives Siti Mariyam; Adhi Putra Satria; Markus Suryoutomo
LAW REFORM Vol 16, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

The House of Representatives is a state institution that functions in the field of legislation. The current fact is that the DPR's performance in the field of legislation always gets records, because the resulting Law is still below Prolegnas target. On the basis of the problems as referred to, the writing of this article aims to find out what the problems and the efforts that need to be made in overcoming the problem of the formation of laws which fall under the authority of the DPR are. In the discussion, the author tries to provide criticism aimed at the process of forming a law in the DPR, seen from three indicators, namely from the legal substance factor, the legal structure factor and the legal culture factor, the legal substance relating to the current Law does not regulate the maximum number of Prolegnas, the legal structure related to law-forming institutions originating from political parties, and the legal culture related to community rejection of the bill being discussed. The solution to these 3 (three) problems needs to be changed, such as strengthening regulations regarding restrictions on performance-based Prolegnas submissions, making Integrity Facts for DPR members and regulations governing public involvement in making laws stronger, this needs to be done in order to keep it up. maintain the level of public trust in the DPR in carrying out its legislative functions.

Penalaran Hukum Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Markus Suryoutomo
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata menormakan perbuatan melanggar hukum, dalam berbagai perkara di pengadilan, hakim secara ex-officio memberikan dan Putusan Hakim dalam Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum, Majelis Hakim dalam mempertimbangkan sisi kebenaran Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum dari fakta yang menjadi dasar Putusan adalah: Menurut Pasal 1365 sampai dengan Pasal 1380 KUHPerdata dikabulkannya rumusan gugatan perbuatan melanggar hukum sebagaimana hakim di dalam memutus perkara menggunakan pendeketan judicial activism atas rasa keadilan yang hidup dan berkembang di masyarakat, dari fakta yang menjadi dasar Putusan adalah: putusan hakim menggunakan pendekatan judicial activism atas dasar rasa keadilan yang hidup dan berkembang di masyarakat. Dalam Artikel ini Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif atau penelitian hukum yang hanya meneliti bahan pustaka sehingga disebut juga penelitian hukum kepustakaan. Dengan mendasarkan Pasal 178 (3) Putusan Subsider: Hakim memutus perkara menuntut rasa keadilan yang ada padanya, (ex aequo et bono), Penalaran hukum hakim lebih diorientasikan, pada sikap dan tanggung jawab, menurut Pasal 5 (1) Hakim dan wajib menggali, mengikuti, dan memahami nilai-nilai hukum dan rasa keadilan yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Hakim melakukan Penalaran Hukum Melalui Interpretasi Hukum yang didasarkan pada Kaidah Hukum, Moral, dan Sosial yang berlaku ditengah masyarakat.

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penyewa Akibat Pemberi Sewa Dinyatakan Pailit Widi Widagdo Pri Wicaksono; Markus Suryoutomo
Jurnal Akta Notaris Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Desember: Jurnal Akta Notaris
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum UNTAG Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/aktanotaris.v2i2.1240

Pemberi Sewa yang mengalami kepailitan menimbulkan masalah serius bagi Penyewa, karena harta kekayaan, termasuk objek sewa, berada di bawah pengurusan dan pemberesan kurator setelah debitor pailit. Permasalahan utama adalah keabsahan Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa yang telah dibuat sebelum kepailitan. Mahkamah Agung memberikan putusan berbeda, di mana pada Nomor 658 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014, Penyewa diizinkan memanfaatkan objek sewa hingga perjanjian berakhir, namun putusan terbalik terjadi pada Nomor 78 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2015 yang menetapkan bahwa kurator memiliki kewenangan dalam pemberhentian dan perpanjangan perjanjian. Perlindungan hukum untuk Penyewa yang dirugikan perlu dipertimbangkan setelah Pemberi Sewa dinyatakan pailit. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan mengacu pada data sekunder, primer, dan tersier, serta pendekatan studi pustaka dan analisis kualitatif. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengkaji keabsahan perjanjian sewa-menyewa setelah kepailitan Pemberi Sewa, menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam penyelesaian sewa menyewa pasca-kepailitan, dan menilai perlindungan hukum bagi Penyewa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepailitan Pemberi Sewa mengakibatkan syarat subjektif perjanjian tidak terpenuhi, memungkinkan pembatalan perjanjian. Perbedaan putusan Mahkamah Agung menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, namun Perlindungan Hukum kepada Penyewa tetap ada berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU. Mereka diakui sebagai Kreditur Konkuren dengan hak pendaftaran tagihan dan keistimewaan tertentu, tanpa terikat jangka waktu pendaftaran tagihan secara umum.

Title

Found 26 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 26 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 26 Documents
Search