Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum El-Iqtishady
Kusnadi Umar
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PASAL IMUNITAS UNDANG-UNDANG ‘CORONA’ DAN KEWENANGAN BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN DALAM MENETAPKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA Kusnadi Umar
El-Iqthisadi Volume 2 Nomor 1 Juni 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisadi.v2i1.14044

Abstract

AbstractArticle 27 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2 of 2020 (Corona Law) in particular the phrase "is not a state financial loss", is regarded as an article of immunity and its existence is deemed to be able to enforce the authority of the BPK as an authoritative state institution in assessing or establishing a financial loss of state. Provisions governing the authority of the BPK and the financial losses of the State, not including part of the provisions which are expressly revoked and/or otherwise void in the provisions of Article 28 of the Corona Law, which specifically contains and confirms the invalidity of the clauses of the various laws. While the phrase "is not a state financial loss" can not be justifying, because the formulation is still common, it tends to potentially cause disharmony between regulations. So in a juridical, the existence of Article 27 paragraph (1) of Corona Law, cannot enforce the authority of the BPK in assessing or establishing financial losses of state. Keywords: Corona law; BPK; State losses; Covid-19AbstrakPasal 27 Ayat (1) Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 (Undang-undang Corona) khususnya frasa “bukan merupakan kerugian negara”, diperspektifkan sebagai pasal imunitas dan keberadaannya dianggap dapat menegasikan kewenangan BPK sebagai lembaga Negara yang otoritatif dalam menilai atau menetapkan kerugian Negara. Ketentuan-ketentuan yang mengatur mengenai kewenangan BPK maupun kerugian Negara, tidak termasuk bagian dari ketentuan-ketentuan yang secara tegas dicabut dan/atau dinyatakan tidak berlaku dalam ketentuan Pasal 28 Undang-undang Corona, yang secara khusus memuat dan menegaskan ketidakberlakuan pasal-pasal dari pelbagai Undang-undang. Sementara frasa “bukan merupakan kerugian negara” tidak dapat dijadikan justifikasi, karena rumusannya masih bersifat umum, bahkan cenderung berpotensi menimbulkan disharmonisasi antar peraturan perundangan-undangan. Sehingga secara yuridis, keberadaan Pasal 27 Ayat (1) Undang-undang Corona, tidak dapat menegasikan kewenangan BPK dalam menilai atau menetapkan kerugian Negara.Kata Kunci: Undang-Undang,  BPK, Kerugian Negara, Covid-19.
POLITICAL CONFIGURATION AND LEGAL PRODUCTS IN INDONESIA IN TERMS OF ISLAMIC CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Ummu Awaliah; Muhammad Saleh Ridwan; Rahmiati Rahmiati; Kusnadi Umar
Al-Risalah VOLUME 21 NO 2, NOVEMBER (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.v21i1.24871

Abstract

Politics and the state are inseparable. The confusion of the form of politics or what is known as the Political Configuration and Legal Products in Indonesia makes people wonder. Then, Islamic Constitutional Law will look at or see how Indonesia's forms of politics and legal products are used. This study aimed to determine Indonesia's political configuration and legal products in terms of Islamic constitutional law. The type of study was normative legal research or research library. The primary data sources were obtained from Al-Qur'an and Hadith, while the secondary data were obtained from books, journals, or materials taken from writings related to the subject matter. The data collection technique was used through the literature by searching, reading, studying, and reviewing related literature. The results of this study showed that: 1) Indonesia currently used a democratic political configuration and responsive legal products, where the public was given space to express themselves and play an active role in determining policies in the government; 2) Islamic constitutional law considered that the political configuration and legal products in Indonesia were in accordance with what was contained in the Islamic constitutional law. This was because Indonesia's democratic political configuration and legal products had the same vision, namely creating prosperity for the general public. 
Co-Authors Muhammad Saleh Ridwan Rahmiati Rahmiati Ummu Awaliah