Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dialektika Buletin Al-Turas Jurnal Sasindo Unpam Jubindo: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Widyaparwa Jurnal Bebasan
Rosida Erowati
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Of Jakarta
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
REPRESENTASI KRITIK SOSIAL PADA NASKAH DRAMA MAHKAMAH KARYA ASRUL SANI Nayla Autar; Cahya Savitri Imania; rosida erowati
Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Department of Indonesia Language and Literature Teaching, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/dialektika.v12i2.43754

Abstract

: Literary works often reflect social dynamics and serve as a tool for critiquing various societal issues. The play Mahkamah by Asrul Sani is an example of a literary work that conveys social criticism through the representation of moral values, injustice, and societal conflicts. This study aims to analyze the representation of social criticism in Mahkamah using Stuart Hall's theory of representation and Solihat's (2017) approach to social criticism. The research method employed is descriptive qualitative with a text analysis approach. Data were collected through a thorough reading of the play’s script, identifying dialogues, characters, and symbols that depict social inequalities. The findings indicate that Mahkamah portrays the conflict between individuals and society, patriarchy, and the tension between traditional values and modernity. Moreover, the play addresses themes of justice, truth, and criticism of society and media, which often manipulate reality. Through symbolic representation and complex characters, Asrul Sani successfully conveys moral messages and social criticism relevant to contemporary issues, such as power disparity, abuse of authority, and the marginalization of certain groups. Mahkamah not only serves as an entertaining work of art but also functions as a tool to promote social change by delivering messages of justice and morality to the public. 
Argumentasi Saksi Ahli dalam Sidang Penistaan Agama oleh Basuki Tjahaja Purnama di Kepulauan Seribu Makyun Subuki; Rosida Erowati; Agus Sulaiman
Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Department of Indonesia Language and Literature Teaching, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/dialektika.v10i2.31595

Abstract

Ahok's controversial statements on the Thousand Islands seem not only led to massive and repeated demonstrations, but also linguistic debates in the courtroom. This study aims to examine the arguments of linguists who give statements in the courtroom in response to Ahok's statement. As a qualitative study using discourse analysis as a method of analysis, this study uses a critical argumentation approach developed by Walton (2002 and 2006) to examine how the argument was constructed and evaluate the quality of the argument. The analysis in this study indicates that the opinion of linguists presented by public prosecutors is often inconsistent and not based on adequate linguistic evidence, not only inconsistent with other expert statements, but also with his own statement as a scientist. Conversely, the linguist presented by Ahok's counsel is more consistent and more able to present linguistic evidence more adequately.
Co-Authors Agni Malagina Agus Sulaiman Ahmad Bahtiar Ahmad Bahtiar, Ahmad Cahya Savitri Imania Fajar Setio Utomo Haryanti, Novi Diah Indah Sundari Kurnia Dhafandy Ramadhan Makyun Subuki Nayla Autar Neneng Nurjanah Sifana Umardi Syihaabul Hudaa