Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.431
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bestuur Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Undang: Jurnal Hukum Prophetic Law Review Indonesian Journal of International Law JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Hang Tuah Law Journal Unisia
Nandang Sutrisno
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Menuntut Tanggung Jawab Hukum IMF Nandang Sutrisno
Unisia No 50/XXVI/IV/2003
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol26.iss50.art4

Abstract

The article below discusses the background that the failure of IMF role in overcoming economy crisis of Indonesia. Departing from the failure of IMF program implies other crisis, for instances social and political crisis. According to writer to solve the above problems, alternative solution needs to be solved and the steps that constitutes main way is should be conducted amendment toward IMF Agreement particularly article IX Section 2 (Hi). Section 3 and Section 8 (I) and Guidelines on Conditionality The amendment that makes the government of Indonesia sues IMF based on statutory obligation. Besides, it also needs to be refolmulated a new contract based on contractual obligation, and new international institution to solve debt of developing countries. 
Liberalisation of Banking Services Under the Framework of Asean Economic Community: an Indonesian Perspective Nandang Sutrisno; Nur Gemilang Mahardhika
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v6i1.65

Abstract

Among the ASEAN members, compared to other members, Indonesia is relatively more liberal in opening up international trade in financial services, especially in banking sector. Through its submission of CIO to the WTO in 2005, Indonesia to some degree offered certain liberalization of banking sector, together with some other services governed under the GATS. On the other hand, other members of ASEAN show their carefulness in liberalizing their banking sectors. As consequence, on one hand foreign banks have occupied nearly 50% of the Indonesian banking industry, and there are only a few units from Indonesia’s domestic banks that present in its ASEAN neighbours, on the other hand. Using normative method, this research elaborates on how Indonesia should strike a balanced stand between its over-liberalized banking sector and the reluctance of other members, while maintaining the GATS principle of “progressive development.” The authors concludes that one of the ways for Indonesia to flip the odds to be in its favour is by urging the implementation of the reciprocity principle in banking services in ASEAN, which additionally, will also stimulate the liberalisation schedule of the latter.
The Regulation of Defendant’s Religious Identity in Court Decisions Nandang Sutrisno; Despan Heryansyah; Sahid Hadi; Christopher M. Cason
BESTUUR Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v10i2.61409

Abstract

This study focuses on using religious attributes in the trial process of corruption cases in Indonesia, the judge’s consideration of the decency of a defendant, and the regulation of a defendant’s religious identity in the court decision. By identifying the judge’s perspective on a defendant's religious attributes and aspects of decency as an interpretative scheme and constructing their significance on it, this study also presents an analysis of the application of the principle of impartiality of judges and courts based on the Bangalore Principles. Impartiality itself is positioned as the bedrock of judicial integrity. With a field-based research method, this study reveals that religious identity has influenced judges and court decisions, especially considering mitigating factors in criminal sentencing. These findings indicate that the Bangalore Principles fall short of clear guidelines to counter such bias and a clear framework in Indonesia’s judiciary to restore its integrity.
Ratifikasi Perjanjian Penyesuaian Wilayah Informasi Penerbangan antara Indonesia dan Singapura: Pilihan Rasional atau Status Quo? Nandang Sutrisno; Rafi Nasrullah Muhammad Romdoni
Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/ujh.5.2.393-417

Abstract

The ratification of the Agreement on Realignment of Flight Information Region (FIR) between Indonesia and Singapore by Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022 produced controversies. Such controversies occurred between the Indonesian government on one side, and the academicians and practitioners on another. The former claims that the ratification indicates the hard work of the Indonesian government to take over the FIR that has been delegated to Singapore. However, the latter questions the status of Indonesia as a sovereign state and its security that would potentially be arose from the ratification. It is because Singapore still takes control over Indonesia’s airspace from 0-37.000 feets. This article studies and analyzes whether the ratification was the best choice taken by Indonesia. The discussion shows that it was not the best yet rational and realistic. It was not, because the possibility of harm and threat to Indonesia’s national security are bigger than the advantages arising from the agreement. It was rational and realistic because it was not ratified, the control of FIR would be status quo and return fully to Singapore without limitation of time. Abstrak Pengesahan Perjanjian Penyesuaian Wilayah Informasi Penerbangan (Flight Information Region/FIR) antara Pemerintah Indonesia dan Pemerintah Singapura melalui Peraturan Presiden Nomor 109 Tahun 2022 menuai polemik. Hal tersebut terjadi antara pihak pemerintah dengan pihak akademisi serta praktisi. Pada satu sisi, pihak pemerintah mengklaim bahwa pengesahan tersebut mengindikasikan kerja keras pemerintah dalam mengambil alih FIR yang didelegasikan kepada Singapura. Oleh karena itu, kini kedaulatan ruang udara dikontrol penuh Indonesia. Namun di sisi lain, para akademisi dan praktisi mempersoalkan status kedaulatan dan juga keamanan yang berpotensi timbul dari pengesahan ini. Hal tersebut dikarenakan Singapura sebenarnya masih memiliki kontrol di ruang udara Indonesia pada ketinggian 0-37.000 kaki. Artikel ini akan mempelajari dan menganalsis apakah pengesahan perjanjian tersebut merupakan langkah yang tepat. Hasil dari kajian artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa pengesahan perjanjian tersebut bukan merupakan langkah terbaik, namun rasional dan realistis. Ia bukan langkah terbaik, disebabkan peluang kerugian dan ancaman terhadap keamanan negara tampak lebih besar dibandingkan keuntungan yang diperoleh dari persetujuan tersebut. Meski demikian, pengesahan ini juga rasional dan realistis, dikarenakan jika tidak disahkan, status FIR akan status quo, tetap sepenuhnya kembali ke Singapura tanpa batas waktu.
Incoterms: Reconstructing International Sales Contracts in Harmony with Sharia Economic Law Arif, Junaidi; Parmitasari, Indah; Sutrisno, Nandang
Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama islam Negeri Majene

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/milkiyah.v4i1.1546

Abstract

In global trade, Incoterms play an essential role as a standardised framework that defines the allocation of responsibilities and risks between sellers and buyers. However, from the perspective of Sharia economic law, the application of Incoterms in some instances has the potential to create gharar, which can impact the validity of the agreement. This study aims to analyse the gap between the provisions of Incoterms 2020 and the principles of fiqh muamalah, particularly in terms of responsibility sharing and risk transfer in international sales contracts. This research searched various academic databases, applying pre-established criteria to obtain relevant studies for review. These studies were further strengthened by normative juridical analysis based on jurisprudence literature and Islamic legal doctrines. A discrepancy between the provision of Incoterms 2020 and the principles of fiqh muamalah, especially concerning risk transfer clauses (such as FOB and CIF). This alignment carries the potential to lead gharar into contractual agreements. Ambiguity in the division of responsibilities can create situations conflicting with the core Islamic principles of ‘adl (justice) and shaffafiyyah (transparency). Consequently, there is a compelling need to reform international contractual systems to integrate Sharia principles while still accommodating the practical demands of global trade. The finding of this study provides a basis for formulating a more transparent and fairer contractual framework by integrating Sharia principles so that gharar can be prevented, leading to maṣlaḥah (public welfare) within cross-border transactions.  
The Appellate Body Crisis: Challenges and Reforms to the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Mechanism Hameed, Meeran; Sutrisno, Nandang; Duffy, Frances Annmarie
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art1

Abstract

The World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body—the keystone of the organization’s two-tier dispute settlement mechanism—has been immobilized since December 2019, when the United States repeatedly withheld consent for the appointment of new judges, thereby breaking the quorum required to hear appeals. This paralysis has triggered cascading operational, legal, and political consequences. Drawing on doctrinal analysis of WTO agreements and a focused case study of recent unresolved disputes, this article charts three interlinked effects of the gridlock. First, it has produced an expanding backlog of appeals and encouraged so-called “appeals into the void,” leaving panel reports in limbo and eroding legal certainty for traders and governments alike. Second, the impasse has incentivized members to experiment with ad hoc alternatives—most notably the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement—risking fragmentation of jurisprudence and unequal access to justice across the membership. Third, the stalemate has weakened trust in the WTO’s ability to enforce multilateral rules at a moment of intensifying geopolitical rivalry, undermining incentives for future rule-making on issues such as digital trade and climate-related measures. This study argues that narrowly framed procedural fixes are insufficient; instead, a holistic reform package is required. Recommended measures include a time-bound and automatic judge-appointment process insulated from single-member vetoes, streamlined appellate procedures to curb excessive litigation delays, and a renewed political compact—possibly codified in a ministerial declaration—reaffirming shared commitments to an independent and binding dispute settlement system. Restoring a credible and predictable appellate function is indispensable for preserving the WTO’s centrality in global trade governance and for sustaining confidence in a rules-based international trading order
Co-Authors Akhmad Al-Farouqi Arif, Junaidi Budi Agus Riswandi Christopher M. Cason Despan Heryansyah Duffy, Frances Annmarie Hameed, Meeran Nur Gemilang Mahardhika Parmitasari, Indah Rafi Nasrullah Muhammad Romdoni Sahid Hadi Sigar Aji Poerana