Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Prita Amalia
Faculty of law, Universitas Padjadjaran
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
POTENSI UMKM DI PANGANDARAN DALAM MENGHADAPI MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN An An Chandrawulan; Dandrivanto Budhijanto; Isis Ikhwansyah; Dewi Kania Sugiharti; Prita Amalia; Purnama Trisnamansyah; Pupung Faisal; Helitha Novianty Muchtar
Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/kumawula.v3i2.24861

Abstract

Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) diharapkan dapat menjadi salah satu sektor ekonomi dalam penggerak roda perekonomian nasional dengan kontribusi dan perannya dalam menyerap tenaga kerja lebih banyak dibanding entitas bisnis lainny. Selain itu, UMKM yang terkhususnya berada di Kabupaten Pangandaran memiliki berbagai macam keunikan baik dari jenis kegiatan usaha, produk, maupun hal lainnya yang memiliki potensi dalam menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA). Namun, permasalahan yang umum dihadapi pelaku UMKM seperti keterbatasan permodalan, SDM yang kurang kompeten dibidangnya dan penggunaan teknologi perlu mendapat dukungan dari berbagai pihak dalam bentuk penguatan. Metodologi pada penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengambilan data dengan cara mengumpulkan dara melalui wawancara dan observasi. Selain itu, sumber data lainnya berasal dari peraturan perundang-undangan, jurnal ilmiah dan sebagainya. Tujuan penelian ini guna meningkatkan potensi UMKM dalam menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UMKM) are expected to become one of the economic sectors in driving the national economy with their contribution and role in absorbing more labor compared to other business entities. In addition, SMEs, especially those in Pangandaran Regency, have a variety of uniqueness both from the types of business activities, products, and other things that have the potential to face the ASEAN Economic Community (MEA). However, common problems faced by MSMEs such as limited capital, human resources who are less competent in their fields and the use of technology need support from various parties in the form of strengthening. The methodology in this research is descriptive qualitative. Data collection techniques by collecting data through interviews and observations. In addition, other data sources come from laws and regulations, scientific journals and so on. The purpose of this study is to increase the potential of MSMEs in facing the ASEAN Economic Community (MEA).
Implementation Regionalization Principle Based on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement According to Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) Velicia Theoartha Manalu; Sinta Dewi Rosadi; Prita Amalia
Yustisia Vol 10, No 2: August 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v10i2.44710

Abstract

The practice of the regionalization principle in Article 6 Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement is still conflicted. This is because of several cases regarding the members misinterpretation of international guidelines in the regionalization principle, such as India – Agricultural Products and Russia – Pigs (EU). Recently, Coronavirus Diseases 2019 (Covid-19) has been considered to affect animal trade. Such conditions prompt the World Trade Organization (WTO)  to recommend the Members to take SPS Measures to protect their domestic market. However, the trade would be inhibited in case the country-wide ban approach is applied. Therefore, this paper discusses the possible SPS measures under the regionalization principle to promote the trade during the pandemic according to WTO decisions from previous cases in line with the VCLT of 1969. The research result shows that the Covid-19 is an obstacle to international trade and makes humans and animals vulnerable to this virus. Consequently, many animal trades have been banned to prevent its spread. To deal with this condition, Indonesia could apply the regionalization principle in Article 6 SPS Agreement. Moreover, the government should update the quarantine law by pointing out the regionalization principle, unlike the zone system rules only applied to animals susceptible to Food Mouth Disease
KLASIFIKASI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL MENURUT HUKUM INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Sashia Diandra Anindita; Prita Amalia
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 1 September 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAKPembentukan Undang-Undang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) merupakan angin segar bagi para pihak yang menggunakan arbitrase dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dalam menyelenggarakan lembaga ini di Indonesia. UU Arbitrase dan APS mengatur putusan arbitrase internasional dalam rangka mengakomodir arbitrase internasional. Permasalahan timbul terhadap klasifikasi putusan arbitrase internasional karena rumusan definisi putusan arbitrase internasional dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS. Definisi yang diatur berbeda dengan definisi Arbitrase internasional dalam Hukum Internasional yakni United Nations Commission On Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). Artikel ini akan membahas mengenai implikasi penerapan klasifikasi menurut hukum Indonesia terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus yang memiliki unsur internasional. Menggunakan metode penilitian yuridis-normatif dalam menganalisa kasus untuk menjawab permasalahan dalam artikel ini dengan menitikberatkan pada data kepustakaan dan data primer yang berkaitan dengan hukum arbitrase internasional. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat ketidaksesuaian dalam penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS, hukum internasional dan praktik-praktik negara lain (Brunei Darussalam, Singapura dan Hong Kong). Penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS berimplikasi terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik dengan meluasnya kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus arbitrase yang memiliki unsur asing.Kata kunci: arbitrase internasional; klasifikasi putusan arbitrase; UNCITRAL Model Law. ABSTRACTThe establishment of the Indonesian Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (ADS) act becomes a new hope for parties who seek legal certainity using arbitration. The act accomodates international arbitration awards by putting the recognition for the awards into its scope of application. The problem arises in regards with the classification of international arbitration. The definition of international arbitration award under the act is different with international arbitration definition under International Law, espescially wit definition from United Nations Commission on Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). This article will discuss the issue arises on how the implication of using Indonesian classification towards the authority of domestic court in arbitration with foreign elements cases. The author used juridical-normative and case-analysing approach to further examine the problems in this thesis by researching on literary data and secondary data that are related to international commercial arbitration law. To conclude, there is incompatibility between Indonesian classification of International Arbitration, with intenational law and parctices of other countries (Brunei darussalam, Singapore and Hong Kong). The implication of the classification in Indonesian Arbitration and ADS is that domestic court jurisdiction expands to arbitration with foreign element cases.Keywords: classification of arbitration award; international arbitration award; UNCITRAL Model Law DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.4
Co-Authors An An Chandrawulan Dandrivanto Budhijanto Dewi Kania Sugiharti Helitha Novianty Muchtar Isis Ikhwansyah Pupung Faisal Purnama Trisnamansyah Sashia Diandra Anindita Sinta Dewi Velicia Theoartha Manalu