Yuni Puspitasari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN MENTERI KEUANGAN NOMOR 242/PMK.03/2014 TENTANG TATA CARA PEMBAYARAN DAN PENYETORAN PAJAK (Studi di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Pamekasan) Yuni Puspitasari
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2019
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Yuni Puspitasari, Agus Yulianto, S.H., M.H., Bahrul Ulum Annafi, SH., M.H. Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya erlanggayuni81@gmail.com  ABSTRAK Dalam penulisan skripsi ini penulis membahas mengenai pelaksanaan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 242/PMK.03/2014 Tentang Tata Cara Pembayaran dan Penyetoran Pajak yang dilakukan di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Pamekasan dimana untuk mengetahui hambatan  dalam pelaksanaan peraturan menteri keuangan dan memberikan solusi dalam mengatasi hambatan tersebut. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi dengan diberlakukannya sistem pembayaran dan penyetoran pajak secara elektronik dengan menggunakan e-biling. Mengingat  dalam pelaksanaannya diharapkan untuk memudahkan wajib pajak dalam melakukan pembayaran dan penyetoran pajak.  namun pada kenyataannya dalam pelaksanaan ini masih terdapat beberapa wajib pajak yang masih belum memahami akan penggunaan e-billing. Sehingga permasalahan terkait pelaksanaan pembayaran pajak secara elektronik dapat dianggap ringan apabila terdapat sosialisasi dari instansi tersebut terhadap wajib pajak terdaftar mengenai pemahaman dan penggunaan e-billing dalam melakukan pembayaran dan penyetoran pajak secara elektronik. Kata Kunci : pelaksanaan, wajib pajak, e_billing  ABSTRACT In writing of this thesis, the author discusses about the implementation of Minister of Finance Regulation Number 242/PMK.03/ 2014 concerning Procedures of Payment and Tax Deposit conducted at Pratama Pamekasan Tax Service Office which aimed to understand obstacles in the implementation of Minister of Finance Regulation and its solution to overcome those obstacles.  It was motivated by the enactment of payment and deposit system using e-billing. Considering that the implementation was expected to facilitate taxpayers in making payment and deposit of taxes.  In reality, however, this implementation shows that some taxpayers still did not understand how to use e-billing. Therefore, the obstacles related to the implementation of tax payment electronically can be understandable if there is a socialization from the institution towards registered tax payers related to understanding and using e-billing in order to handle payment and deposit of taxes electronically. Keywords: implementation, taxpayer, e-billing
Legal Mechanisms of Constitutional Amendment Through the Authoritative Normative Text Approach: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and South Africa Nadir Nadir; Yuni Puspitasari; Adinda Rachman; Erfan Arisandi
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i4.815

Abstract

This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis comparing the legal mechanisms of constitutional amendment in Indonesia and South Africa. The research employs a normative juridical method with a comparative law approach. Primary data is sourced from the authoritative texts of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945) and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Data analysis is conducted qualitatively using content analysis techniques on provisions related to constitutional amendments in both supreme legal documents. The research findings reveal fundamental differences in the constitutional amendment paradigms of both countries. First, Indonesia adopts a rigid amendment system implemented by the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) with very strict quorum and approval requirements. Second, South Africa adopts a more flexible and differentiated system, where Parliament acts as the constituent authority, with varying approval levels depending on the substance of the amended provisions ranging from simple majority to two-thirds, and even involving the Provincial Council for certain matters. Third, despite different approaches, both countries affirm the principle of constitutional supremacy. These mechanistic differences reflect Indonesia's strategic choice to prioritize consensus and constitutional stability, while South Africa emphasizes constitutional adaptability and responsiveness to socio-political developments.