Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Isbat Nikah Poligami Ditinjau dari Maslahah mursalah Al-Shatiby: Studi SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Muhammad Nasrulloh; M. Fauzan Zenrif; R. Cecep Lukman Yasin
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Vol 24 No 1 (2021): Al-Qanun, Vol. 24, No. 1, Juni 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alqanun.2021.24.1.122-144

Abstract

The presence of SEMA Number 3 of 2018, which prohibits polygamy marriage, hurts women. This is because women do not have legal power over their marriages and cannot access the legal umbrella through the only way, namely the isbat of marriage. The logical consequence of this is that when their husbands neglect siri polygamous women, women undoubtedly have difficulty demanding their rights and difficulties in giving up their status. This study seeks to dissect the interests of polygamous siri women by considering aspects of their benefit. The study's focus is to answer how the position of polygamous marriage when juxtaposed with women's interests is still prohibited or allowed. The study carried out was a normative study with the maslahah mursalah Al-Shatiby as the analysis tool. The final hypothesis illustrates that it is precisely the prohibition of marriage to have an impact on women. This is because the maslahah of prohibiting marriage is assumptive, while the negativity of a woman whom her husband ignores is factual. Therefore, the prohibition of SEMA number 3 of 2018 must be re-read and studied more deeply in the interests of polygamous women in siri.   Abstrak: Hadirnya SEMA Nomor 3 tahun 2018 yang melarang isbat nikah poligami berdampak mudlarat atas perempuan. Pasalnya perempuan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum atas pernikahannya dan tidak bisa mengakses payung hukum melalui satu-satunya jalan yakni isbat nikah. Konsekuensi logis dari hal tersebut adalah ketika perempuan poligami siri diabaikan oleh suaminya, niscaya perempuan kesulitan menuntut haknya dan kesulitan pula melepaskan statusnya. Kajian ini berusaha membedah kepentingan perempuan poligami siri dengan mempertimbangkan aspek kemaslahatannya. Fokus kajian guna menjawab bagaimana kedudukan isbat nikah poligami jika disandingkan kepada kepentingan perempuan apakah tetap dilaranga atau diperbolehkan. Telaah yang dilakukan bersifat kajian normatif dengan maslahah mursalah Al-Shatiby sebagai pisau analisisnya. Hipotesa akhir menggambarkan bahwa justru pelarangan isbat nikah berdampak mudlarat kepada perempuan. Sebab maslahah pelarangan isbat nikah bersifat asumtif sedang kemudlaratan perempuan yang diabaikan suaminya bersifat faktual. Oleh karena itu pelarangan SEMA nomor 3 tahun 2018 harus dibaca ulang serta dikaji lebih dalam demi kepentingan perempuan yang dipoligami siri.  
Poligami sebagai Perkawinan Abnormal: Kajian terhadap Syariat Islam Muhammad Nasrulloh; Doli Witro
Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2021.201.17-30

Abstract

Polarisasi poligami dewasa ini menyeruak di permukaan. Hal ini ditengarai oleh pihak-pihak yang mengkampanyekan poligami dengan massif. Secara tidak sehat, Al-Quran dan Hadis dijadikan alat guna membungkus kampanye tersebut seolah poligami itu ‘Islami’. Akibatnya timbul paradoks, di mana sebagian orang berasumsi bahwa Islam agama yang pro dan mendukung poligami. Fakta demikian perlu diluruskan mengingat secara prinsip, agama Islam menjunjung tinggi penghormatan dan keadilan atas sesama makhluk Tuhan. Tidak boleh ada superioritas atas satu pihak yang berakibat memarginalkan pihak lain. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini berusaha membedah fikih poligami dalam Islam bagaimana sesungguhnya konteks poligami berlaku dan apakah benar Islam mendukung hal tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan kajian normatif dengan pendekatan komprehensif guna menghasilkan konklusi yang akurat dan valid. Hipotesa kajian ini hendak membangun pemahaman bahwa poligami adalah pernikahan yang layak dipakai sebagai alternatif dengan berbagai fakta di antaranya secara prinsip fikih tidak menganjurkan poligami. Ayat poligami tidak bermakna wajib namun kebolehan, poligami Rasulullah s.a.w. bukan karena hasrat, hikmah pernikahan kontradiksi dengan poligami serta pendapat dari beberapa cendikiawan Muslim menyangkut persoalan poligami. Sejurus dengan temuan tersebut, poligami layak diperbincangkan pada ranah ‘abnormal’ dimana tidak semua kondisi praktik demikian patut dilakukan.[The polarization of polygamy is currently on the surface. This is suspected by those who are campaigning for polygamy. Unhealthily, Al-Quran and Hadith are used as tools to wrap the campaign as if polygamy is “Islamic” Polygamy, Sharia, Alternative. The result is a paradox, where some people assume that Islam is a pro and supports polygamy. This fact needs to be straightened out considering that the Islamic religion upholds respect and justice for fellow divine beings in principle. There must be no superiority over one party, which results in the marginalization of the other. Therefore, this study seeks to dissect the polygamy sharia in Islam, how the context of polygamy applies and whether Islam supports it. This study uses a normative study with a comprehensive approach to producing accurate and valid conclusions. This study’s hypothesis is to understand that polygamy is alternative fikih with various facts, including in principle that jurisprudence does not advocate polygamy. The verse polygamy does not mean obligatory but permissible, polygamy the Prophet s.a.w. not because of the passion, wisdom of marriage and polygamy, and some Muslim scholars’ opinions. In line with these findings, polygamy deserves to be discussed in the realm of ‘abnormal’ where not all practice conditions are appropriate.]
PEMBAGIAN WARIS SAMA RATA ANAK LAKI-LAKI DAN PEREMPUAN PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAT DAN KEADILAN ISLAM: Analisis putusan 3052/Pdt.G.2010/PA.Kab.Malang Muhammad Nasrulloh; Doli Witro
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 7, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v7i2.4350

Abstract

The Religious Court of Malang Regency decided to divide the inheritance equally between sons and daughters. This certainly deviates from the sound of Article 176 KHI and the Koran in Surah an-Nisa’ verse 11, which states that the male share is two to one female share. The judge’s decision was based on the hadith of the apostle, which reads equalize in giving to sons and daughters and refers to article 183, which contains peace in distribution. This research is analysis-based normative research that seeks to examine the decisions of the Religious Courts in terms of benefits and Islamic justice. This study concludes that the judge’s decision is weak. Because the basis of the argument for article 183 is final and binding. At the same time, this case did not find a consensus. In addition, there has been no elaboration regarding the share of each heir before the agreement as mandated by Article 183. The judge’s decision is classified as biased because it annulled the principle of balanced justice without being confirmed by social facts and family culture. Judges tend to beat the average regardless of the attributes of the family heirs. This further strengthens the judge’s decision which is easily broken if brought to the appeal table.
PEMBAGIAN WARIS SAMA RATA ANAK LAKI-LAKI DAN PEREMPUAN PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAT DAN KEADILAN ISLAM: Analisis putusan 3052/Pdt.G.2010/PA.Kab.Malang Muhammad Nasrulloh; Doli Witro
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 7, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v7i2.4350

Abstract

The Religious Court of Malang Regency decided to divide the inheritance equally between sons and daughters. This certainly deviates from the sound of Article 176 KHI and the Koran in Surah an-Nisa’ verse 11, which states that the male share is two to one female share. The judge’s decision was based on the hadith of the apostle, which reads equalize in giving to sons and daughters and refers to article 183, which contains peace in distribution. This research is analysis-based normative research that seeks to examine the decisions of the Religious Courts in terms of benefits and Islamic justice. This study concludes that the judge’s decision is weak. Because the basis of the argument for article 183 is final and binding. At the same time, this case did not find a consensus. In addition, there has been no elaboration regarding the share of each heir before the agreement as mandated by Article 183. The judge’s decision is classified as biased because it annulled the principle of balanced justice without being confirmed by social facts and family culture. Judges tend to beat the average regardless of the attributes of the family heirs. This further strengthens the judge’s decision which is easily broken if brought to the appeal table.