Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Research Report - Social Science Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Veritas et Justitia
Catharina Ria Budiningsih, Catharina Ria
Jurusan Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PERUSAHAAN BERTANGGUNGJAWAB: MOTIVASI KEPATUHAN UKM TERHADAP PERATURAN Budiana Gomulia; Catharina Ria Budiningsih; Vera Intanie
Research Report - Humanities and Social Science Vol. 1 (2015)
Publisher : Research Report - Humanities and Social Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1277.371 KB)

Abstract

Usaha Kecil dan Menengah memiliki kedudukan yang penting dalamperekonomian Indonesia . Demikian juga bagi perekonomian di Jawa Barat selama tahun 2012 UKM memberikan kontribusi terhadap pendapatan daerah sebesar 45,5%. Sejalan meningkatnya aktivitas dan peran UKM dalam perekonomian lokal, nasional maupun regional mempersoalkan “Corporate Citizenship” dari kelompok usaha kecildan menengah menjadi semakin menarik.Semua perusahaan besar atau kecil seyogyanya 1) bertanggungjawab untuk menghasilkan keuntungan (bagi pemilik) 2) bertanggungjawab melayani kebutuhan para pemangku kepentingan (konsumen, pekerja, tetangga, dsb) 3) bertanggungjawab menjaga kelestarian alam . Sejalan dengan konsep tanggungjawab yang mendukung keberlanjutan ekonomi-sosial-alam “ Triple Bottom line” . Hukum/Peraturan Perusahaan memiliki fungsi mengatur yang dapat memaksa setiap perusahaan untuk mematuhinya. Kewajiban yang diatur oleh hukum merupakan tanggungjawab minimal perusahaan . Menurut filosofi moral motivasi perusahaan mematuhi hukum mungkin bersifat deskriptiv , instrumental atau normativ.Diawali studi pustaka terhadap Hukum Perusahaan (ada 5 yang dipilih) ,dilanjutkan diskusi dengan para praktisi hukum dan bisnis untuk memperoleh pandangan tentang permasalahan perusahaan menjalankan kewajibannya . Survey yang disusun merupakan survey pendapat umum (psikososial), diisi oleh 27 perusahaan kecil dan menengah bidang makanan di Bandung. Dengan menggunakan program Excel dilakukan perhitungan statistik deskriptiv . Analisisnya bersifat kualitatif untukmemaparkan wujud tanggungjawab dari ke 27 UKM di Bandung. Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia yang meliputi Perijinan dan Daftar Perusahaan , UU.Perlindungan Konsumen, UU. Ketenagakerjaan , UU. Pangan , UU.Limbah Berbahaya memiliki “spirit hukum” kepastian hukum dan tertib administrasi , pro penyelenggaran usaha yang baik , dan pro keberlanjutan sosial-alam-profit.UKM industri makanan memahami perlunya mematuhi hukum untuk menjaga reputasi perusahaan dan menciptakan rasa tenang dalam menjalankan usahanya. Bahwa perusahaan menyadari mereka akan memperoleh keuntungan yang baik kalau berhasil memuaskan para pemangku kepentingan seperti konsumen, masyarakat lokal maupun pekerjanya. Bahkan perusahaan menjalankan kegiatan berderma sebagaisebagai dorongan hatinya.Kata kunci :Tanggungjawab Perusahaan , Keberlanjutan “Triple Bottom Line” , Hukum/PeraturanPerusahaan   
Analisis Hukum Penghapusan Merek Ikea Nur Febry Rahmadhiani; Catharina Ria Budiningsih Ria Budiningsih
Syiar Hukum Volume 15, No 2 (2017) : Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/sh.v15i2.3105

Abstract

Trademarks have important functions for their owners, especially in the global trading era. Trademarks give indication of the origin and the quality of the traded goods or services. Trademark owners have the exclusive rights to authorize or prohibit others from using the same or similar marks with their own. Indonesia using a constitutive registration system, namely an exclusive right is granted for a registered trademark. A trademark applicant may not register the same mark with another person's well-known trademarks. A registered trademark must be used. Annulment of a trademark is done when the mark is not used for three consecutive years. Supreme Court Decision No.264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 which held that IKEA owned by Inter IKEA System was annulled and the registration of ikea owned by PT Ratania Khatulistiwa was valid. The result of normative analysis on the case showed that the annulment of Inter IKEA System trademark and the validity of trademark application by PT Ratania Khatulistiwa did not automatically recognize the ownership of Ikea by PT Ratania Khatulistiwa. Judge verdict resulted Inter IKEA System’s right to be excluded from trademark registration system so as allowing anyone to register the Ikea trademark. PT Ratania Khatulistiwa has exclusive rights if the application has passed the registration procedure and has a trademark certificate. If Inter IKEA System wishes to defend the same trademark, it must file an objection to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property and file a cancellation of the new trademark owner in court. If it has not succeeded it can still appeal and re-register. In general, trademark annulment occurs when a trademark is not used in the trade in goods and services. If the old owner still wants the same trademark rights, it must apply for a trademark registration and follow the entire registration procedure. If another party has first filed a trademark application, the former owner may file an objection. If this attempt fails, he may file a cancellation to the Commercial Court, the cassation, and a court review. It is recommended that the registered trademark owners use their registered trademarks. Long roads must be taken if the trademark rights is removed because it is not in use but the owner still wants the trademark rights.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENOLAKAN PEMBATALAN MEREK “PIERRE CARDIN” Irawan, Vania; Budiningsih, Catharina Ria
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i2.6959

Abstract

Well-known trademarks are crucial to be protected because they are susceptible to infringement by third parties. Disputes concerning well-known trademarks are quite prevalent in Indonesia. One case involving a well-known trademark in Indonesia that is the focus of this research is the "PIERRE CARDIN" trademark case. Therefore, this research aims to investigate and analyze the "PIERRE CARDIN" trademark case based on Decision Number 15/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, Decision Number 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015, and Decision Number 49 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018. The research methodology employed is descriptive-analytical, involving an examination of legal documents and literature in the field of law. The analysis results indicate that there were inaccuracies in the judge's decision-making. The judge ruled that there was no evidence of bad faith in an individual's registration of the "PIERRE CARDIN" trademark, even though the registered trademark was the same as another individual's name and well-known trademark. The judge also made an inaccurate decision regarding the distinctiveness of the trademark. This inaccuracy in the decision could have implications for trade and investment due to the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of protection for famous trademarks in Indonesia.
PENGALIHAN HAK MEREK MELALUI WAKAF BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA DAN PRINSIP SYARIAH Yustisia, Fasya; Budiningsih, Catharina Ria
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v5i2.3616

Abstract

This article discusses the utilization of the Islamic institution of wakaf (an Islamic institution) to transfer ownership or right to use of trademark. The issue at hand is that method of trademark transfer is found regulated by Law No. 20 of 2016 re. Trademark and Geographical Indication whilst procedure and conditions of wakaf is regulated by Islamic/Syariah Law (Law No. 41 of 2004). The author notes that wakaf, understood as transfer of (ownership or proprietorship) of Trademarks, is or should be motivated by religious considerations or made in the public interest. Therefore, transfer done through wakaf will always be made in perpetuity.  Nonetheless, the Law no. 41 of 2004 re. wakaf make possible temporary transfer of ownership which may be performed by a license agreement, transferring only right to use the trademark but not the ownership (title) thereof. Another important note to be highlighted is that Islamic law prohibits or considers not appropriate (not halal) trademark of living being or non-kosher products (goods or services).
Co-Authors Budiana Gomulia Irawan, Vania Nur Febry Rahmadhiani Vera Intanie Dewi Yustisia, Fasya