Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Kosmik Hukum ADIL : Jurnal Hukum
Yoefanca Halim
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
KEABSAHAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG BELUM INKRACHT SEBAGAI NOVUM DALAM PENGAJUAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI Yoefanca Halim; Hardy Salim
Jurnal ADIL Vol 10, No 2 (2019): DESEMBER 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33476/ajl.v10i2.1226

Abstract

Suatu lembaga peradilan disebut baik, bukan saja jika prosesnya berlangsung jujur, bersih, dan tidak memihak. Namun di samping itu ada lagi kriteria yang harus dipenuhi, yakni prinsip-prinsip yang sifatnya terbuka, korektif, dan rekorektif. Dalam kriteria ini, salah satu sisi yang patut menjadi perhatian manajemen peradilan adalah adanya sistem upaya hukum yang baik sebagai bagian dari prinsip fairness dan trial independency yang menjadi prinsip-prinsip diakui secara universal. Kesempatan seluas-luasnya untuk mengajukan koreksi dan rekoreksi terhadap putusan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (inkracht) yang dipandang tidak adil oleh pencari keadilan dapat dilakukan melalui Peninjauan Kembali. Namun demikian Peninjauan Kembali sangatlah limitative, salah satunya dengan syarat adanya novum. Namun pengaturan mengenai syarat-syarat dapat dikatakan suatu keadaan sebagai novum tidak diatur secara tegas. Dengan melihat hal tersebut memunculkan suatu permasalahan tentang, “Bagaimana keabsahan putusan pengadilan yang belum inkracht sebagai novum dalam pengajuan peninjauan kembali?”. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif atau yuridis.
Transformative-Participatory Legal Research Method for Harmonizing The Existence of The Living Law in Indonesia Yoefanca Halim; Fricky Sudewo; Jestin Justian
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 26, No 2, December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20190130

Abstract

The most common research which conducted in Indonesia is a doctrinal research, based on the deductive approach. Theoretically, all provisions have noble goals, but in practice there are several difficulties in term of implementation, especially related to existence of living law. Therefore, appropriate legal-research method is needed to counter the polemic, namely the use of transformative-participatory legal research method. The article aims to explore how to harmonize the living law with transformative-participatory legal research methods. The method uses in the study is the normative legal research method. The research found that through the transformative-participatory legal research, legal researchers would still accommodate the essence of legal analysis founded in conventional methods, but it will not be confined by those methods.  The living law is the essence in society and based on transformative-participatory research method, the law-making process needs a community participation and empowerment.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan Dengan Minuta Akta Tyas Fidelia; Yoefanca Halim; Fricky Soedewo
Kosmik Hukum Vol 20, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v20i1.5410

Abstract

Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other laws, as described in Article 1 number 1 of the Law on the Position of Notary Public. In carrying out his position, a Notary is required to act trustworthy, honest, thorough, independent, impartial, and safeguarding the interests of the parties concerned as well as making a Deed in the form of a Minute Deed. In addition, a Notary is required to issue a Grosse Akta, a Copy of the Deed, or a Quotation of the Deed based on the Minuta Deed. These matters are regulated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public. By looking at these provisions, it is fitting for a Notary to carry out his obligations. But in reality, you can still find Notaries who do not carry out the obligations as stipulated in the Law on Notary Position. Starting from negligence in maintaining the Minuta Akta to differences between the Deed of Copy and the Minuta Akta. Of course, the difference between the Deed of Copy and the Minuta of the Deed will give losses to the parties who entered into an agreement. Regarding the responsibilities of a Notary Public, in general, it can be reviewed on a civil, criminal basis, the Law on the Position of Notary Public, and the responsibility for carrying out his / her duties based on the Notary's code of ethics. By looking at this raises a problem regarding, "What is the responsibility of the Notary for the non-conformity of the Copy Deed with the Minuta Deed?". The method used in this research is a normative or juridical legal research method.Keywords: Notary, Deed, and Notary Responsibilities
Co-Authors Fricky Soedewo Fricky Sudewo Hardy Salim Jestin Justian Tyas Fidelia