Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Development Research LEGAL BRIEF
Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
Universitas Hasanuddin
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Government’s Role in Preventing the Theft During and After Natural Disasters Ambara Dewita Purnama; M. Syukri Akub; Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1927

Abstract

Weak supervision and security during and after natural disasters have created new problems. Crime of theft is now rife at the time and after natural disasters. This study aims to determine the government's role in preventing theft during and after natural disasters in the city of Palu. This research is an empirical legal research with a criminological approach. The study was conducted in Palu City, Central Sulawesi. The results of this study indicate that the government's role in efforts to prevent  theft can only overcome theft crimes that are motivated by urgent need of victims of natural disasters and cannot cope with theft that are motivated by opportunity.
Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of Illegal Charges Perpetrated by Civil Servants (Case Study of the Makassar District Attorney) Ismail A. Rauf; Abd. Azis; Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (291.558 KB) | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v11i4.474

Abstract

Law enforcement against perpetrators of illegal levies committed by civil servants that occurred in Makassar has not been firmly enforced with penalties in accordance with the law. This research is an empirical normative research, combining a normative legal approach to legislation with empirical elements in the form of interviews. The results of the study indicate that law enforcement against criminal acts of Corruption with the Modus Operandi of carrying out illegal levies (Pungli) by Civil Servants and State Organizers is currently still limited to the application and enforcement of the provisions of Article 12 letter e of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 31 of 1999 regarding the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended and added to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001, this is due to an understanding by Law Enforcement Officials who are of the view that illegal levies have nothing to do with State Financial Loss, and (2) In the context of In the author's research, the Makassar District Attorney has many factors that affect the enforcement of illegal levies, as follows, namely the Law Factor, Law Enforcement Factor, Facilities or Facilities Factor, Factors society, cultural factors
ANALISIS TINDAK PIDANA KOLUSI DAN NEPOTISME DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 1999 Muhammad Arfandy Amran; Syamsuddin Muchtar; Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Vol 18, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/supremasi.v18i1.44139

Abstract

Analisis Tindak Pidana Kolusi dan Nepotisme dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 1999. Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Kolusi dan Tindak Pidana Nepotisme dilakukan dalam rangka mewujudkan good governance yang bersih dan responsif (clean and responsive state) yang ditandai dengan semaraknya masyarakat sipil (vibrant civil society) dan kehidupan bisnis yang bertanggungjawab (good coorporate governance). Namun, Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 1999 masih dianggap kurang aplikatif. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui penafsiran frasa “kerugian orang lain, masyarakat dan/atau negara” dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 1999 dan untuk mengetahui penegakan hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Kolusi dan Nepotisme. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual yang disajikan secara deskriptif kualitatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Bahan hukum bersumber dari peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur lain. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penelitian kepustakaan (library research) atau dokumentasi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan frasa kerugian dapat berupa kerugian materil maupun non materil yang tersusun secara alternatif. Tidak harus terpenuhi keseluruhan unsur dari Pasal 1 Ayat 4. Artinya apabila salah satu diantara ketiga pihak tersebut dirugikan, maka rumusan delik ini sudah dimaknai telah memenuhi unsur. Frasa kerugian dapat terpenuhi apabila terpenuhinya kerugian nyata atau actual loss yang terlebih dahulu diperiksa atau diaudit. Masih terdapat berbagai persoalan baik dalam substansi hukum, struktur hukum maupun kultur atau budaya hukum yang dibuktikan bahwa belum ada satu pun kasus yang memiliki kekuatan hukum yang tetap yang dipidana menggunakan delik Kolusi dan Nepotisme.
Online Gender Based Violence Against Women Ratu Indra Kasih Pratiwi; Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana; Audyna Mayasari Muin
Journal of Development Research Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Volume 7, Number 1, May 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28926/jdr.v7i1.229

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of online gender based violence against women in Indonesia criminal regulations. This research use the normative methods. Accumulation method used by the author in this research is literature study. With a research approach that prioritizes legal materials in the form of legislation as a basic reference material in conducting research. As well as a conceptual approach used to understand concepts related to normalization in a legislation whether on accordance with the spirit contained in the underlying legal concepted. The research’s result shown that the regulation of online gender based violence against women in Indonesia criminal law could be concluded as follow: first, Law Number 1 of 1946 on Criminal Regulations. Second, Law Number 19 of 2016 on amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transaction. Third, Law Number 44 of 2008 on Pornography, and last Law Number 12 of 2022 on Crime of Sexual Violence.
Digital Forensic Urgence in Analyzing Electronic Evidence for Evidence of Criminal Actions in Information and Electronic Transactions Rivad Achmad Fahrezi Abdullah; Audyna Mayasari; Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
Journal of Development Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Volume 7, Number 2, November 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28926/jdr.v7i2.238

Abstract

This study aims to determine the position of digital examination results as electronic evidence for proving criminal acts of information and electronic transactions. This research was conducted using normative research methods. which is done by researching library materials and judges' decisions then analyzing the materials which are methods or methods used in a legal research to find answers which will later become a prescription for the legal problems faced. The results of this study indicate that digital evidence in the form of information and electronic documents and has passed the digital forensic process is legal evidence, as stated in Article 5 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. . So that the position of electronic evidence from the results of digital forensic examinations as evidence of expert testimony and documentary evidence at the stage of investigation and proof in the trial process.
Co-Authors Abd. Azis Ambara Dewita Purnama Audyna Mayasari Audyna Mayasari Muin Ismail A. Rauf Muhammad Arfandy Amran Ratu Indra Kasih Pratiwi Rivad Achmad Fahrezi Abdullah Syamsuddin Muchtar Syukri Akub