Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCEDURAL LAW OF RESPONSIBILITY ENFORCEMENT OF CORPORATE CRIME IN INTEGRATED CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 17, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.3.769

Abstract

Privatization of business in various countries greatly affects on economic growth and development that corporate’s activities increasingly dominate legal subjects of Person and State. It also tends to trigger corporate crime. The issues of this research are causes of ineffective criminal procedural law implementation, how to anticipate those causes to create impartial judiciary, and how to reform corporate criminal procedural law “ius constituendum” that is holistic in order to create equal formulation between Person and Corporation. Then, it can be concluded that, First, corporate criminal procedural law “Ius Constitutum” is still centralized and fragmented, Second, a systematic and integrated corporate criminal procedural law is required, Third holistic reformation policy of corporate criminal procedural law “ius constituendum” which hierarchically equals to Law must be immediately formulated. Therefore, it is recommended to be discussed and legalized in Prolegnas 2018. Keywords: Corporation, Enforcement, Criminal Procedural Law, Integrated
Peningkatan Kapasitas Masyarakat dalam Pencegahan Judi Online di Desa Kalibaru, Kecamatan Cilincing, Jakarta Utara Tahun 2024 Ririn Nurhidayanti; Fransiska Milenia Cesarianti; Samsuto Samsuto; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait
Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/cakrawala.v3i3.3139

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of online gambling prevention socialization activities and their impact as well as the establishment of a village corner library in Kalibaru Village, Cilincing District, North Jakarta. Through a participatory method, this research involves the public directly in socialization that discusses the dangers and negative impacts of online gambling, including legal, mental health, and social aspects. In addition, the village corner library was established as a learning center that provides access to related literature to increase public awareness. The results of the study show that socialization and the establishment of libraries significantly increase public knowledge and awareness about the risks of online gambling. The active participation of the community in the socialization and utilization of libraries indicates the success of this intervention. The conclusion of this study is that a community-based approach, through education and literacy improvement, is an effective strategy in preventing online gambling and strengthening people's capacity to face social challenges.
Terrorism Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Integrating Pancasila in The Fight Against Modern Threats Muhamad Zarkasih; Sri G M Hatta; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait; Wagiman Wagiman
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i1.767

Abstract

The evolving threat of terrorism in Indonesia has led to the development of counterterrorism laws aimed at combating both domestic and international terrorist activities. Since the Bali bombings in 2002, Indonesia has enacted a series of legal frameworks, such as Law No. 15 of 2003 and its amendments through Law No. 5 of 2018. However, these laws have raised significant concerns about human rights violations, especially regarding the treatment of detainees, preventive detention, and arbitrary arrests. This study adopts a qualitative research methodology, combining doctrinal legal analysis and empirical data gathered from interviews with legal experts, policymakers, and practitioners. It critically examines the compatibility of Indonesia’s counterterrorism laws with international human rights standards, focusing on their implementation, particularly in relation to the fundamental values of Pancasila—the state ideology of Indonesia, which emphasizes social justice, unity, and human dignity. The results highlight several key challenges, such as the need for stronger oversight mechanisms, more effective deradicalization programs, and a comprehensive approach to online radicalization. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating Pancasila principles more thoroughly into counterterrorism strategies, strengthening international cooperation, and ensuring that security measures do not infringe upon individual rights. By addressing these issues, Indonesia can enhance the effectiveness of its counterterrorism efforts while adhering to its commitment to human rights and social justice.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION ON CLASSIFICATION OF IMPORTED GOODS PARAQUAT DICHLORIDE FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY Enna Budiman; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait; Khalimi
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.422

Abstract

The classification dispute over the import of Paraquat Dichloride between an importing company and the Directorate General of Customs and Excise has become an important precedent in Indonesian State Administrative Law (TUN), particularly in the customs sector. The dispute arose due to different interpretations of tariff classification: the importer classified Paraquat 42% Technical as a raw chemical (HS 2933.39.30.00) with a 0% import duty rate, while Customs classified it as a ready-to-use herbicide (HS 3808.93.19.00) with a 5% rate. This dispute had significant implications for the fiscal obligations of both the company and the state, and highlighted regulatory uncertainty in the pesticide industry. This study aims to analyze the dispute resolution mechanism in that context, covering the appeal process at the Tax Court, Judicial Review at the Supreme Court, and the broader implications for legal certainty and administrative practices. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and a case study of court decisions. The analysis found and concluded: First, the administrative dispute resolution mechanism in customs classification follows a tiered process consisting of administrative objection, judicial appeal to the Tax Court, and judicial review (PK) to the Supreme Court. Second, in terms of legal reasoning, both the importer and DJBC presented arguments based on valid legal frameworks, but differed in interpreting the tariff classification, each supported by legally debatable claims. Third, the Tax Court and the Supreme Court assessed the case objectively using evidence such as laboratory analysis results, the Indonesian Customs Tariff Book (BTKI), and fundamental principles of administrative law. Fourth, the legal implications of the Supreme Court's ruling are highly significant for public administration, reinforcing the legal authority of DJBC and potentially serving as jurisprudence in the future.
Co-Authors Enna Budiman Fransiska Milenia Cesarianti Khalimi Muhamad Zarkasih Ririn Nurhidayanti Samsuto Samsuto Sri G M Hatta Wagiman Wagiman