Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tindak Pidana Pornografi dalam Era Siber di Indonesia Bambang Sudjito; Abdul Majid; Faizin Sulistio; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto
Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (839.046 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.wacana.2016.019.02.1

Abstract

Fokus isu dan / atau permasalahan pada analisis (a) hakekat pengaturan tindak pidana Pornografi di Indonesia; (b) realita putusan lembaga peradilan di Indonesia terhadap tindak pidana pornografi; dan (c) pengaturan tindak pidana pornografi dalam upaya penanggulangan pornografi diera siber di Indonesia.  Penelitian dalam lingkup hukum normatif melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang undangan, kasus, dan konsep; bahan hukum dalam penelitian, antara lain  Kitab Undang undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Indonesia; Undang Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2008 tentang Pornografi; Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik; dan Convention on Cyber Crime Tahun 2001, Budapest – Hungaria; teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui identifikasi dan klasifikasi ketentuan hukum pornografi siber serta mengkaji berbagai literatur terkait; dan analisis bahan hukum melalui substansi tentang pornografi siber serta asas asas hukum dan kebijakan hukum dalam peraturan perundang undangan. Hasil penelitian hukum normatif bermanfaat, baik teoritis untuk pengembangan dalam keilmuan hukum pidana (pornografi / pornografi siber) serta keilmuan terkait lainnya ataupun praktis untuk penegakan hukum pidana di bidang pornografi / pornografi siber (Kepolisian, Kejaksaan, Pengadilan, dan lembaga terkait lainnya).
Notarial Use of Electronic Signatures: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and South Korea Dwi Kinasih, Klaura; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto; Diana R.W. Napitupulu
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.334

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has significantly transformed notarial practices, particularly regarding the use of electronic signatures in the creation of authentic deeds. This study provides a normative legal analysis comparing the regulation of electronic signatures by notaries in Indonesia and South Korea, focusing on legal certainty, document validity, and authenticity. In Indonesia, the regulation is governed by Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions as last amended by Law Number 1 of 2024, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions, and the Notary Position Act (UUJN), which requires that deeds be signed in the physical presence of a notary. Meanwhile, South Korea comprehensively regulates this matter through the Electronic Signature Act (ESA) and the Notary Act, which authorizes notaries to use certified electronic signatures supported by a government-integrated digital verification system. This research employs a normative juridical approach with comparative legal analysis to examine the alignment and divergence of legal norms between the two countries, as well as their relation to the authenticity principle of deeds as stipulated in Article 1868 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The findings reveal that South Korea has fully implemented electronic signatures in notarial practice through robust legal and technological infrastructure, whereas Indonesia still faces normative conflicts among the ITE Law, the Notary Position Act, and the Civil Code. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is necessary to ensure that Indonesia's notarial system can transition toward digitalization while preserving authenticity and legal certainty.
Concept of Regulating The Mechanism For Deleting Personal Data And Deleting Indexes In Order To Ensure Legal Certainty Anas Rafi Prakasya; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto; Rachmi Sulistyarini
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 2 (2026): September in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i2.376

Abstract

Digital transformation has accelerated the massive use of personal data in various sectors, including government, business, health, and public services. However, the increasing use of digital systems also raises risks of data breaches, misuse of information, and the persistence of harmful digital footprints. This study analyzes the legal regulation of personal data erasure and de-indexing mechanisms in Indonesia and examines the extent to which these mechanisms provide legal certainty for data subjects and data controllers. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The study finds that Indonesia has recognized the right to erasure and the right to delisting through the ITE Law, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019, and Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection. Nevertheless, implementation remains problematic due to fragmented regulations, unclear procedural standards, limited institutional oversight, and the absence of comprehensive implementing regulations. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, the establishment of independent supervisory institutions, clear procedural mechanisms, and increased public digital literacy are essential to ensure effective personal data protection and legal certainty in Indonesia.