Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tindak Pidana Pornografi dalam Era Siber di Indonesia Bambang Sudjito; Abdul Majid; Faizin Sulistio; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto
Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies Vol. 19 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (839.046 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.wacana.2016.019.02.1

Abstract

Fokus isu dan / atau permasalahan pada analisis (a) hakekat pengaturan tindak pidana Pornografi di Indonesia; (b) realita putusan lembaga peradilan di Indonesia terhadap tindak pidana pornografi; dan (c) pengaturan tindak pidana pornografi dalam upaya penanggulangan pornografi diera siber di Indonesia.  Penelitian dalam lingkup hukum normatif melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang undangan, kasus, dan konsep; bahan hukum dalam penelitian, antara lain  Kitab Undang undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Indonesia; Undang Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2008 tentang Pornografi; Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik; dan Convention on Cyber Crime Tahun 2001, Budapest – Hungaria; teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui identifikasi dan klasifikasi ketentuan hukum pornografi siber serta mengkaji berbagai literatur terkait; dan analisis bahan hukum melalui substansi tentang pornografi siber serta asas asas hukum dan kebijakan hukum dalam peraturan perundang undangan. Hasil penelitian hukum normatif bermanfaat, baik teoritis untuk pengembangan dalam keilmuan hukum pidana (pornografi / pornografi siber) serta keilmuan terkait lainnya ataupun praktis untuk penegakan hukum pidana di bidang pornografi / pornografi siber (Kepolisian, Kejaksaan, Pengadilan, dan lembaga terkait lainnya).
THE LEGAL CERTAINTY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE AUTHENTICATION UNDER THE CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW IN INDONESIA Kevien Dicky Aldison; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto; M. Sudirman
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the legal certainty of electronic evidence authentication under the Civil Procedure Law in Indonesia. The research highlights the importance of providing regulation to authenticate electronic evidence, as stated in Article 5 of Law Number 1 of 2024, which concerns the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 regarding Electronic Information and Transactions. The study adopts a normative juridical approach; the researcher's focus in this legal research is on legal principles and legal inventory research. The researcher aims to analyze the legal principles governing electronic evidence and its authentication process in civil procedure law. The primary purpose of this research is to ensure that legal certainty regarding the authentication of electronic evidence is achieved perfectly and comprehensively. It is considered necessary, given that civil procedure law in Indonesia has not explicitly regulated the authentication mechanism for electronic evidence until now. Therefore, by adding legal provisions that specifically restrict the authentication of electronic evidence in civil procedure law, the value of legal certainty can be achieved fully and comprehensively. This research is expected to contribute in the form of conceptual and normative analysis that can strengthen the argument regarding the urgency of regulating the authentication of electronic evidence. Thus, the results of this research not only provide an academic foundation but also offer constructive ideas that are relevant to the development of civil procedure law in Indonesia, particularly in the context of resolving civil disputes involving the use of electronic evidence.
POLICY ON THE LEGAL REGULATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS INVOLVING THE MISUSE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DEEPFAKES Amalia Andayani Nugraha; Faizin Sulistio; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4416

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has brought significant advances in various areas of human life, but on the other hand, it has also created new challenges in the legal field, especially through the emergence of deepfake technology. Deepfake technology utilizes AI to manipulate images, videos, and voices of individuals to appear realistic, which in practice is often misused for purposes such as fraud, pornography, spreading hoaxes, and damaging reputations. Indonesia currently has no specific regulations governing the misuse of deepfake technology, so law enforcement still relies on general provisions such as the Criminal Code, the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and the Sexual Violence Criminal Law. This legal vacuum or incompleteness causes legal uncertainty and potential violations of the principle of legality. Through a criminal law policy approach, adaptive legal reforms are needed to keep pace with developments in digital technology. Efforts that can be made include revising the Electronic Information and Transaction Law as lex specialis that regulates provisions on deepfakes or formulating specific regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) that comprehensively regulate ethical aspects, responsibility, and criminal liability. This policy is expected to provide certainty, justice, and protection of individual rights in facing the legal challenges of the digital era in Indonesia.