Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

MENGKRITISI KONSEP ISLAMISASI ILMU ISMAIL RAJI AL-FARUQI: Telaah Pemikiran Ziauddin Sardar Muhammad Taufik; Muhammad Yasir
Jurnal Ushuluddin Vol 25, No 2 (2017): July - December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jush.v25i2.3830

Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh karena adanya khazanah pemikiran keislaman, yaitu isuIslamisasi ilmu yang merupakan salah satu isu yang selalu menarik diperbincangkan beberapadekade ini. Hal ini terjadi karena ada berbagai pandangan dan penafsiran tentang Islamisasiilmu. Konsep ilm meniscayakan umat Islam untuk memahami realitas secara utuh. Hal ini telah dilakukan oleh sarjana dan intelektual Muslim klasik, seperti al-Kindi, al-Farabi, al-Ghazali, Ibnu Rusyd dan sarjana klasik lainnya. Akan tetapi, sarjana Muslim kontemporer tampak mengesampingkan peranan epistemologi ini. Sehingga yang terjadi kemudian adalah justru Islam kehilangan jati diri sebagai kekuatan yang punya orientasi epistemologis yang sebenarnya sudah mapan di era klasik. Konsep Islamisasi ilmu populer di tangan al-Faruqi dan juga Naquib al- Attas. Bagi al-Faruqi, Islamisasi ilmu pengetahuan adalah mengislamkan disiplin-disiplin ilmu atau tepatnya menghasilkan buku-buku pegangan (buku dasar) di perguruan tinggi, dengan menuangkan kembali disiplin ilmu modern ke dalam wawasan Islam, setelah dilakukan kajian kritis terhadap kedua sistem pengetahuan Islam dan Barat. Selain itu, al-Faruqi juga memberikan langkah-langkah prosedural bagi terlaksanya program Islamisasi ilmu. Penulis menemukan poin penting dari kajian ini bahwa pemikiran Islamisasi ilmu al-Faruqi inilah yang dikritisi oleh Sardar, menurutnya perumusan epistemologi Islam kontemporer tidak dapat dimulai dengan menitikberatkan pada disiplin ilmu yang sudah ada. Sardar mengungkapkan bahwa epistemologi Islam kontemporer dapat dirumuskan dengan dengan mengembangkan paradigma-paradigma di dalam ekspresi-ekspresi eksternal peradaban Muslim yang meliputi sains dan teknologi, politik dan hubungan-hubungan internasional, struktur-struktur sosial dan kegiatan ekonomi, pembangunan desa dan kota. Semua aspek ekspesi eksternal peradaban Muslim tersebut dapat dipelajari dan dikembangan dalam kaitannya dengan kebutuhan-kebutuhan dan realitas kontemporer. Dari sini Sardar sekali lagi menolak Islamisasi ilmu pengetahuan dimulai dari disiplin ilmu yang sudah ada. Hal ini karena disiplin ilmu tersebut tidak sesuai dengan nilai-nilai Islam

Membaca Simbol Dalam Teks Agama dengan Semiotika Muhammad Taufik
Religi: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Vol 17, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/rejusta.2021.1701-01

The background of this study is based on the curiosity that the science of interpretation is considered by some people to be the only knowledge in understanding religious texts in this case the al-Qur'an. Whereas semiotics should be a tool that strengthens the existence of the science of interpretation. As a science, semiotics can be used as a tool of analysis or an approach to read symbols in religion. When observed, it appears that religion basically cannot be separated from talking about symbols, religion is in fact always related to symbols. The purpose of this paper is to reveal the extent to which semiotics plays a role in explaining the meaning of symbols contained in religion. Semiotics in this case is expected to provide a contribution which is expected to make it easier for us to understand how to read symbols in religion. The symbol in religion, in this case Islam, is mentioned in the Koran, which inevitably must have the right method of understanding it in order to get the real meaning, it is in this position that semiotics shows its existence. The method that the authors use in writing in this study uses the analysis-interpretive. That is, the elaboration or explanation of the research broadly and thoroughly, has a role to find, tell, and reveal the meaning contained in the object under study in this study. The results of this study explain that semiotics as a method can play a role in explaining religious messages contained in the holy book, in this case the al-Qur'an, many of which are expressed in the form of symbolic language. The meaning of this symbol is what the semiotics tries to uncover.

FILSAFAT BARAT ERA SKOLASTIK (Telaah Kritis Pemikiran Thomas Aquinas) Muhammad Taufik
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jiiu.v19i2.4444

This paper tries to discuss how Western philosophy critically examined the thought of Thomas Aquinas in the scholastic era. The scholastic era or known medieval philosophy whose style is the philosophy of collaborating with theology in harmony. Philosophy in the scholastic era gave birth to many famous theologians-philosophers, one of whom was Thomas Aquinas, who was the subject of this paper. After the authors traced through this paper the answer found that Aquinas was the most important figure of Western philosophy in the scholastic era. Aquinas is considered to have made a real contribution in unifying the original elements of Augustine's thought, strongly influenced by the philosophy of Neo-Platonism, with the philosophy of Aristotle. The author criticized Aquinas's view that Aristotle's philosophical system contains true rational truths. Basically using philosophical methods to understand theology is very helpful. That has been done by Aquinas; it only needs to be underlined that the method for understanding philosophy without losing the nature of theology is not entirely correct either. However there are also problems that cannot be fully explained by philosophical approaches. Like the problem of beliefs related to metaphysical problems, for example. The problem of belief in matters that are metaphysical is a problem that is difficult to explain philosophical logic. Aquinas stated that theological truth is clear to human reason. For example, it is the truth about God's existence. This truth comes from revelation, but how to explain philosophically that can satisfy curiosity so that what is believed can be understood rationally.

THE DYNAMICS OF THOUGHT AND POLICY OF CLASSIFICATION OF SCIENCES IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS COLLEGES Muhammad Zainal Abidin; Muhamad Sabirin; Muhammad Taufik
Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol 20, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/khazanah.v20i2.4765

The idea of the classification of science in Islamic Religious Colleges in Indonesia can be traced historically from the spirit of the establishment of Islamic tertiary institutions in this country, which from time to time transformed dynamically to find the ideal format of sciences. The spirit of the classification of science is basically related to efforts to bring up integralistic sciences, which no longer focuses solely on the pure religious sciences, but also accommodates general sciences. The writing of this paper uses a combination of library research and field research. The aspect of the literature to be investigated is about the policies of the Indonesian government related to the classification of science in Islamic tertiary institutions in Indonesia. In the implementation aspect, it took place in three campuses: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta and UIN Maliki Malang. An important finding from this research is that the implementation of the policy on science sciences at Islamic Religious Colleges in Indonesia is not completely smooth sailing. Strong resistance from below on the spirit of uniformity of nomenclature turned out to have an impact on the revocation of Minister of Religion Regulation No. 36/2009 concerning Determination of Science and Academic Degrees in the Environment of Religious Higher Education. Finally, PMA 33 Year 2016 no longer talks about the uniformity of faculty nomenclature, this regulation only talks about the names of study programs and academic degrees that are obtained Gagasan klasifikasi ilmu di Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam di Indonesia dapat ditelusuri secara historis dari semangat berdirinya perguruan tinggi Islam di negeri ini dalam kurun waktu yang panjang, yang dari waktu ke waktu terus mengalami transformasi dinamis untuk menemukan formatnya yang ideal. Semangat pengklasifikasian ilmu pada dasarnya terkait dengan upaya memunculkan ilmu-ilmu integralistik, yang tidak lagi hanya menitikberatkan pada ilmu-ilmu agama murni, tetapi juga mengakomodir ilmu-ilmu umum. Penulisan artikel ini memadukan antara studi kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan. Aspek literatur yang akan diteliti adalah tentang kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia terkait klasifikasi ilmu di perguruan tinggi Islam di Indonesia, dengan lokus penelitian pada tiga kampus utama, yaitu UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dan UIN Maliki Malang. Temuan penting dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa implementasi kebijakan ilmu sains di Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam di Indonesia tidak sepenuhnya berjalan mulus. Resistensi yang kuat dari bawah terhadap semangat penyeragaman nomenklatur ternyata berdampak pada pencabutan Peraturan Menteri Agama No. 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Penetapan Gelar Keilmuan dan Akademik di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan. Terakhir, PMA 33 Tahun 2016 tidak lagi membicarakan keseragaman nomenklatur fakultas, peraturan ini hanya membicarakan nama program studi dan gelar akademik yang diperoleh

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search