Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ANALYSIS OF TEST ITEM ON THE FINAL TEST SEMESTER EXAM ON ARABIC SUBJECTS Yogia Prihartini; Wahyudi Buska; Nur Hasnah
Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban | Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2019
Publisher : Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (848.079 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/a.v6i1.10926

Abstract

This research is aimed; (a) to give a description about Arabic final semester test questions arrangements procedure at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. (b) to give a description about the quality of the test as seen from its validity, reliability, difficulty, and differentiation capacity. (c) to give a description that the lecturers never did an exam questions analysis of Arabic exam subject at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. This research uses the descriptive method with quantitative and qualitative data. The population within this research is the college students of Tadris major in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training who follows the final semester exam of 2017-2018 tenet years, especially in Arabic test subject. The sample taken during this research is the college students from the Tadris major, who followed the final semester exam on Arabic subject, by using the purpose sampling technique. The data collecting technique used was documentation, interview, and questionnaires. The results of this research are (1) the types of this tests are achievement test from the teaching objectives aspect, teacher-made test from the arrangement aspect, summative test from the time of implementation aspect, written test from the method of performing aspects, and subjective test from the answer scoring aspect, (2) the quality of Arabic test year 2017/2018: (a) validity sufficient, (b) test reliability is high which is 0,74, (c) the difficulty is easy earning it a ‘bad’ category, which is 45 numbers of questions or 11,11%, (d) the differentiation capacity is bad, which is 45 numbers of questions, or 22,22%, (3) the reason why the lecturers and question maker team did not held a question analysis are as follows: (a) some of the Arabic lecturers in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang are not scholars of Arabic education major or not lenient with S-1 and S-2 academic degree, (b) they have zero experience in doing test analysis, (c) there is no order from the authorities which motivates the lecturers in doing test analysis, (d) the lack of understanding about analysis, and (e) there are lecturers who have never received training or seminar about evaluation and analysis.
Peran dan Tugas Guru dalam Melaksanakan 4 Fungsi Manajemen EMASLIM dalam Pembelajaran di Workshop Yogia Prihartini; Wahyudi Buska; Nur Hasnah; Muhammad Ridha Ds
Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 19 No. 02 (2019): Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kerinci, Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/islamika.v19i02.327

Abstract

Dalam dunia pendidikan, keberadaan peran dan fungsi guru merupakan salah satu faktor yang sangat signifikan. Guru merupakan bagian terpenting dalam proses belajar mengajar, baik di jalur pendidikan formal maupun informal. Oleh sebab itu, dalam setiap upaya peningkatan kualitas pendidikan di tanah air, tidak dapat dilepaskan dari berbagai hal yang berkaitan dengan ek`sistensi guru itu sendiri. Pembelajaran pada hakikatnya adalah proses sebab-akibat. Guru sebagai pengajar merupakan penyebab utama terjadinya proses pembelajaran siswa, meskipun tidak semua belajar siswa merupakan akibat guru yang mengajar. Oleh sebab itu, guru sebagai figur sentral harus mampu menetapkan strategi pembelajaran yang tepat sehingga dapat mendorong terjadinya perbuatan belajar siswa yang aktif, produktif, dan efesien. Guru hendaknya dalam mengajar harus memperhatikan kesiapan, tingkat kematangan, dan cara belajar siswa.Maka Guru menempati posisi kunci dan strategis dalam menciptakan suasana belajar yang kondusif dan menyenangkan untuk mengarahkan siswa agar dapat mencapai tujuan secara optimal. Untuk guru harus mampu menempatkan dirinya sebagai diseminator, informator, transmitter, transformator, organizer, fasilitator, motivator, dan evaluator bagi terciptanya proses pembelajaran siswa yang dinamis dan inovatif.
ANALYSIS OF TEST ITEM ON THE FINAL TEST SEMESTER EXAM ON ARABIC SUBJECTS Yogia Prihartini; Wahyudi Buska; Nur Hasnah
Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban | Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2019
Publisher : Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/a.v6i1.10926

Abstract

This research is aimed; (a) to give a description about Arabic final semester test questions arrangements procedure at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. (b) to give a description about the quality of the test as seen from its validity, reliability, difficulty, and differentiation capacity. (c) to give a description that the lecturers never did an exam questions analysis of Arabic exam subject at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. This research uses the descriptive method with quantitative and qualitative data. The population within this research is the college students of Tadris major in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training who follows the final semester exam of 2017-2018 tenet years, especially in Arabic test subject. The sample taken during this research is the college students from the Tadris major, who followed the final semester exam on Arabic subject, by using the purpose sampling technique. The data collecting technique used was documentation, interview, and questionnaires. The results of this research are (1) the types of this tests are achievement test from the teaching objectives aspect, teacher-made test from the arrangement aspect, summative test from the time of implementation aspect, written test from the method of performing aspects, and subjective test from the answer scoring aspect, (2) the quality of Arabic test year 2017/2018: (a) validity sufficient, (b) test reliability is high which is 0,74, (c) the difficulty is easy earning it a ‘bad’ category, which is 45 numbers of questions or 11,11%, (d) the differentiation capacity is bad, which is 45 numbers of questions, or 22,22%, (3) the reason why the lecturers and question maker team did not held a question analysis are as follows: (a) some of the Arabic lecturers in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang are not scholars of Arabic education major or not lenient with S-1 and S-2 academic degree, (b) they have zero experience in doing test analysis, (c) there is no order from the authorities which motivates the lecturers in doing test analysis, (d) the lack of understanding about analysis, and (e) there are lecturers who have never received training or seminar about evaluation and analysis.