Suslianto Suslianto
Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

STUDI HUKUM PEMBATALAN SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH Suslianto Suslianto; Ismet Hadi; Desi Andella
Akademika Vol 9, No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31314/akademika.v9i1.888

Abstract

This study aims to understand the cancellation of land title certificates. This research is a normative juridical legal research which uses perspective analysis method. The results of this study indicate that, First, the reason that can become the basis for an application for cancellation of a certificate of ownership over land is that the cancellation of a certificate of ownership of land can be submitted for cancellation if the certificate of ownership of the land after being issued is detrimental to one of the parties. An application for cancellation of a land title certificate can be made if the certificate contains administrative defects. Second, the procedure for requesting a certificate cancellation can be carried out and settlement is taken in two ways, namely through BPN or settlement through the court by filing a lawsuit.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami tentang pembatalan sertipikat hak milik atas tanah, Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat yuridis normatif yang menggunakan metode analisis prespektif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, Pertama, Alasan atau sebab yang dapat menjadi dasar adanya permohonan pembatalan sertifikat hak milik atas tanah yaitu, pembatalan sertifikat hak milik atas tanah dapat diajukan permohonan pembatalannya apabila sertifikat hak milik atas tanah tersebut setelah diterbitkan merugikan salah satu pihak. permohonan pembatalan sertifikat hak milik atas tanah dapat dilakukan apabila sertifikat tersebut mengandung cacat administrasi. Kedua, Prosedur permohonan pembatalan sertifikat dapat dilakukan dan diambil penyelasaian melalui dua cara yaitu melalui BPN atau penyelesaian melalui pengadilan dengan mengajukan gugatan.
KETAATAN HUKUM KEPALA DESA TERHADAP REGULASI DESA (Studi di Kecamatan Telaga Biru Kabupaten Gorontalo) Salahudin Pakaya; Suslianto Suslianto
Maleo Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): April 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In general the village head has to obey the existing village regulation, only sometimes they experienced pain points in the operational technical things, so to anticipate, village head consulting directly by confidently to local government especially on the dinas/technical agency dealing with the village government administration in this namely Dinas Community Empowerment Unit Gorontalo Regency. Consultation is effective steps to avoid the understanding of the regulation, so that protected also from kekelirua and error making policy decisions or in managing the village government program.The obedience of the village head to the rule because it was influenced by fears will be given the penalty for both the sanction administrative nature such as the reduction and/or temporary suspension of financial rights until the dismissal sanction with not distinguished from the office, especially if get the criminal sanction. In the sub-district Blue Pools there are already 2 (two) officials village heads who were dismissed because doing immoral, this has become the commitment of Gorontalo Regency Government that breach immoral is disgraceful act which is also a breach of the customs that are not necessarily done by the village head as the main figure indigenous peoples in the village as a citizen. Keyword : The obedience, Village Head, Village Rule
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Nomor:0548/Pdt.G/2016/Pa.Gtlo Di Pengadilan Agama Gorontalo Siti Nur Setia Rahman; Muh. Amin Dali; Suslianto Suslianto
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): September : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v1i3.586

Abstract

The problems raised in this research are (1) whether the inheritance distribution according to decision number: 0548/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Gtlo has been realized on yulianti boki while the barrier is still alive? (2) how do judges mediate the inheritance case number: 0548/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Gtlo in the Gorontalo religious court? This research aimed to determine the realization of the decision number: 0548/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Gtlo on the distribution of inheritance to Yuliyanti Boki, the heir of the Mahjub. To analyze how judges mediate inheritance disputes through decision number: 0548/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Gtlo at the Gorontalo Religious Court, this type of research is field research, namely field observations of the object being studied in order to obtain data that is relevant to matters relating to the problems studied and which focuses on the results of data collection from informants who have been determined, namely the judges of the Gorontalo Religious Court. The judge’s decision showed that Yuliyanti Pakaya was not the primary heir but the mahjub heir who was not entitled to receive the inheritance. However, Yuliyanti Pakaya was still given the distribution of inheritance by the primary heirs voluntarily through the results of mediation conducted by the Gorontalo Religious Court judges.