Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris
Serlika Aprita
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NIAGA DALAM MEMERIKSA DAN MEMUTUS PERKARA PERMOHONAN PERNYATAN PAILIT Serlika Aprita
Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Vol 14 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Samudra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33059/jhsk.v14i1.1178

Abstract

Salah satu persoalan yang sangat mendesak dan memerlukan pemecahan saat ini setelah penyempurnaan aturan kepailitan adalah pembentukan Pengadilan Niaga sebagai pengadilan khusus dalam lingkungan Peradilan Umum. Pengadilan Niaga yang pertama dibentuk adalah Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat, selanjutnya berdasarkan Keputusan Presiden (Keppres) Nomor 97 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pembentukkan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri didirikan Pengadilan Niaga di Makassar, Surabaya, Medan, dan Semarang. Dualisme kewenangan mengadili antara Pengadilan Niaga dengan Pengadilan Negeri mengakibatkan timbulnya permasalahan mengenai yurisdiksi mengadili suatu perkara. Permasalahan kekuasaan atau yurisdiksi mengadili timbul disebapkan berbagai faktor satu diantaranya faktor instansi peradilan yang membedakan eksistensi antara peradilan banding dan peradilan kasasi sebagai peradilan yang lebih tinggi (superior court) berhadapan dengan peradilan tingkat pertama (inferior court). Jenis penelitian dalam penulisan jurnal ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Dalam rangka pengembangan kompetensi atau wewenang Pengadilan Niaga di era globalisasi, maka diperlukan konsep yang matang untuk mempersiapkan perluasan kompetensi absolut dari Pengadilan Niaga agar Pengadilan Niaga dapat dipercaya dan kredibel di mata pencari keadilan, selain itu pula diperlukam pengakuan atas keberadaan dan eksistensi Pengadilan Niaga dalam hubungannya dengan wewenang yang dimiliki Pengadilan Niaga dalam memeriksa dan memutus permohonan pernyataan pailit melalui adanya pengaturan mengenai kekhususan hukum acara Pengadilan Niaga, dikarenakan hukum acara yang selama ini digunakan dalam pemeriksaan perkara kepailitan di Pengadilan Niaga masih menggunakan ketentuan Herziene Indonesisch Reglement atau Rechreglement Buitengewesten (HIR/R.BG). Untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai kepada pihak ketiga (penggugat), yang perkara perdatanya dimenangkan di Pengadilan Negeri perlu dibuat mekanisme hukum acara tentang penghentian eksekusi putusan Pengadilan Negeri sehubungan dengan adanya putusan Pengadilan Niaga yang menyatakan debitor pailit
Bankruptcy Moratorium Plan and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Reviewed From Legal Protection of Creditors Serlika Aprita
Syiar Hukum Volume 20, No 1 (2022) : Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/shjih.v20i1.9679

Abstract

The formulation of a bankruptcy moratorium policy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is not an urgent matter to be enacted in the form of a Perppu because it has been regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. If this policy is enforced, then legally the legal authority for the application for filing for bankruptcy and the application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is in the hands of the Government. And the tendency of this which initially aims to provide opportunities for debtors to be able to resolve debt problems within a certain period of time will actually lead to losses experienced by other parties, such as the banking industry. It is not only a loss, but this pattern also leads the interested parties to use this as a momentum to benefit themselves through the moral hazard mode.
Urgensi Nasionalisasi Penanaman Modal Asing oleh Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Serlika Aprita; Hasanal Mulkan
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 22, No 3 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2426

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the urgency of the nationalization of foreign investment by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia. The legal research method used is normative legal research. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia is currently in a position to nationalize foreign capital companies by prioritizing the potential of the nation and state and not closing themselves on the entry of foreign capital for the sake of realizing economic growth. Foreign investment in the perspective of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment must prioritize the welfare of the Indonesian people by prioritizing the potential possessed by the nation and state without neglecting Indonesia's economic and political sovereignty. the nationalization carried out by Bolivia, Venezuela and Mexico can be used as a comparison and lesson for the Government of the Republic of Indonesia in nationalizing that the President, he uses his power to realize the will of the people in the aim of restoring economic and political sovereignty over its natural resources.
ASSET RECOVERY DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA Hasanal Mulkan; Serlika Aprita
The Juris Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v7i1.870

Abstract

The positive law in force in Indonesia that regulates corruption is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. In overcoming the problem of corruption, in fact there are many difficulties faced by law enforcers which have become a routine part of law enforcement constraints in Indonesia. In addition, the problem is even more difficult if when the perpetrators of corruption are not in Indonesia, where trials are conducted in absentia, then the assets resulting from corruption have been hidden abroad, so this creates serious problems for prosecutors in carrying out executions. However, today the functionalization of criminal law in the context of enforcing the law on corruption, both from the point of view of material criminal law, formal criminal law (criminal procedure law), as well as criminal implementation, still faces obstacles, especially regarding the policy of recovering assets of perpetrators of corruption has implications for the implementation of the execution of replacement money payments in order to optimize the recovery of state financial losses. Thus, obstacles in eradicating criminal acts of corruption must be addressed immediately, so that they do not become an inhibiting factor in efforts to restore state financial losses, so that the national development program can run optimally. The current policy of recovering assets of perpetrators of corruption in an effort to recover state financial losses cannot be implemented optimally, because it must be recognized that current national law still has many weaknesses that create difficulties for law enforcers in recovering assets of perpetrators of corruption, especially in terms of confiscating the assets of the perpetrators of corruption, so that the return on state financial losses resulting from corruption is currently not optimal.
Co-Authors Hasanal Mulkan Hasanal Mulkan