Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Utilization of Geological Wealth of Celebes Canyon Tourism Area, Libureng Village, Tanete Riaja District, Barru Regency Sirajuddin, Haerany; Pachri, Hendra; Imran, A. M.; Langkoke, Rohaya; ., Kaharuddin; ., Sultan; Burhanuddin, Safri; ., Bahrul; Halide, Lidemar; A., Dwi Nuraeni; Jannah, A. Mifthahul
JURNAL TEPAT : Teknologi Terapan untuk Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 7 No 2 (2024): Kolaborasi yang Kuat untuk Kekuatan Kemasyarakatan
Publisher : Faculty of Engineering UNHAS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25042/jurnal_tepat.v7i2.544

Abstract

The development of the tourist area in Celebes Canyon, Libureng Village, Tanete Riaja District, Barru Regency, has enormous potential in utilizing the geological wealth of the area, where the rocks resemble the Grand Canyon in America. Community service activities in Libureng Village aim to provide understanding and socialize the utilization of the geological wealth of Celebes Canyon to the community living around the tourist area, in this case as community service partners, as well as identifying the challenges and opportunities in developing this tourist destination. With an inclusive approach, it is hoped that Celebes Canyon will not only be a tourist attraction, but also provide economic and social benefits to the surrounding community. The method used in this LBE (Laboratory Based Education) community service activity is to conduct observations aimed at obtaining systematic data on the objects to be socialized and continued with socialization activities to the Libureng village community. Based on the results of the observation, it was found that the development of facilities and infrastructure around the tourist attraction needs to be carried out to maintain the geological potential and natural beauty and reduce environmental damage, besides that it is also necessary to always maintain cleanliness around the tourist area. During the socialization activity, a pre-test was conducted on 20 local residents regarding the potential and utilization of geological wealth, as well as the importance of maintaining the environment around the tourist area, the results showed that the level of understanding was in the range of 15% - 42%, but the post-test showed an increase in understanding of 22% - 67%. The importance of cooperation between various stakeholders to create a harmonious partnership in managing tourist attractions; as well as improving the quality of human resources from both managers and local communities is very much needed to support the development of sustainable tourist attractions.
Vulnerability of Mass Movement Zonation Using DEM in Upstream – Midstream Kelara Watershed, Jeneponto Regency, South Sulawesi Fathurrahman, Fathurrahman; Azikin, Busthan; Imran, A. M.
Journal of Geology and Exploration Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Geology and Exploration, June 2024
Publisher : CV Insight Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58227/jge.v3i1.164

Abstract

Mass movement is one of the major natural disasters that claim many lives and property. The Kelara watershed, which is the research area, often encounters land movements that often cause casualties. The problem of mass movement often occurs in the upstream - midstream part of the Kelara watershed with mountainous to hilly morphology with moderately steep to steeply sloping relief. The parameters used in this analysis are lithology, distance from faults, distance from rivers, distance from streets, land use, rainfall, soil type, slope, profile curvature, and slope aspect. The analysis was conducted by giving weights based on the comparison of soil movement events to the class of each parameter using the Weight of Evidence method. Based on the Weight of Evidence method, the mass movement vulnerability zone is divided into five zones, very low vulnerability zone occupies 7.75%, low vulnerability zone occupies 27.11%, medium vulnerability zone occupies 31.76%, high vulnerability zone occupies 21.72%, and very high vulnerability zone occupies 11.66% of the total study area. Based on validation using the AUC value, the Weight of Evidence Method has a value of 0.771 (Fairly Good Model).