Sihabudin Sihabudin
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Arena Hukum

PENGATURAN KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH INDONESIA MENGENAI TATA NIAGA IMPOR PANGAN Sihabudin Sihabudin
Arena Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (789.557 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2015.00802.5

Abstract

AbstractPolicy is a government decision that is general and preveils to all people. The legal consequences of being a member of the world trade organization is that the Indonesian government must take submissive and obedient to the rules agreed in international trade agreements related to exports and imports, including making changes to the legal instruments and policy development in the trade sector. The marketing of rice and several other food commodities involving import has dimensions that are not simple problems, even multi-dimensional, ranging from economic, political, as well as socio-cultural.Indonesian government's policies regarding the regulation of food import regulation is an effort to protect domestic manufacturers from dumping activities or due to increased imports, Indonesia is also to protect consumers from imported products that do not meet the quality standards of security and health of consumers.This paper is about to do a reformulation of the government's policy regarding the adjustment of the trade system for food imports, in order to find effective policy formulation and efficient in solving the problems that arise regarding the marketing of food imports that has been happening. By using descriptive normative legal analysis, the study found that the common thread of chaos cross trade system for food import regulations which are due to unfitted between national regulations and regional regulations (AFTA, CAFTA, APEC) as well as global regulations (GATT-WTO). Thus, administrative reform of domestic and foreign trade are necessary, particularly regarding to the procedure of rice imports. All forms of deviations in import licensing process, document manipulation, and the pattern of non-governmental practices must obtain decisive action, both administratively and legally, as a valuable shock-therapy. AbstrakKebijakan adalah keputusan pemerintah yang bersifat umum dan berlaku untuk seluruh anggota masyarakat. Konsekuensi hukum dari menjadi anggota organisasi perdagangan dunia adalah bahwasanya pemerintah Indonesia harus ikut tunduk dan patuh pada kaidah-kaidah yang disepakati dalam persetujuan perdagangan internasional terkait ekspor-impor, termasuk melakukan perubahan terhadap instrumen hukum dan kebijaksanaan pembangunan di sektor perdagangan. Tata niaga beras dan beberapa komoditas pangan lain yang melibatkan impor memiliki dimensi permasalahan yang tidak sederhana, bahkan multi-dimensi, mulai dari ekonomi, politik, bahkan sosio kultural. Kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia mengenai pengaturan tata niaga impor pangan merupakan upaya melindungi produsen dalam negeri dari kegiatan dumping atau karena meningkatnya produk impor, juga untuk melindungi konsumen Indonesia dari produk impor yang tidak memenuhi standar kualitas keamanan dan kesehatan konsumen. Tulisan ini hendak melakukan reformulasi kebijakan pemerintah mengenai pengatuan tata niaga impor pangan, agar ditemukan rumusan kebijakan yang efektif dan efisien dalam menyelesaikan problematika yang muncul seputar tata niaga impor pangan yang selama ini terjadi. Dengan menggunakan analisis hukum normatif deskriptif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa benang merah dari silang sengkarut regulasi tata niaga impor pangan diantaranya adalah karena tidak sinkronnya antara regulasi nasional dengan regulasi regional (AFTA, CAFTA, APEC) maupun regulasi global (GATT-WTO). Sehingga, diperlukan pembenahan administrasi perdagangan dalam negeri dan perdagangan luar negeri, khususnya yang berhubungan dengan prosedur impor beras. Segala bentuk penyimpangan dalam proses perizinan impor, manipulasi dokumen, dan pola praktik non-pemerintah perlu memperoleh tindakan tegas, baik secara administratif, maupun secara legal, sebagai shock-therapy yang berharga. 
REEVALUASI PEMBIAYAAN PERUSAHAAN MELALUI MODAL VENTURA DI INDONESIA Sihabudin SIHABUDIN
Arena Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.37 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00902.8

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims to discuss the development of venture capital reevaluation in Indonesia that provides an opportunity for businesses to develop the corporation through financing. This paper uses normative juridical research. The results of the analysis is that the regulation and legal policy which can provide adequate legal protection is needed to support the corporation neither the corporation founded by the State or by private parties. Capital is needed in the establishment and operation of an enterprise, including through venture capital. Therefore, the existence of venture capital should be supported by the government as a regulator and facilitator and community businesses which can grow better so that not only large companies but also small firms and medium can be helped by the growth of venture capital. On the other hand, since the inclusion of funds to the venture capital system is high risk for investors, then early investors must be careful in order to save funds or capital is entered into the corporation's business partners. AbstrakTulisan ini bertujuan untuk membahas mengenai reevaluasi Pengembangan modal ventura di indonesia memberikan kesempatan bagi pelaku bisnis untuk mengembangkan perusahaannya melalui pembiayaan.Tulisan ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil dari analisis dalam tulisan ini adalah bahwa  Pengaturan dan kebijakan hukum yang dapat memberikan  perlindungan hukum yang memadai diperlukan untuk mendukung kegiatan perusahaan baik perusahaan yang didirikan oleh Negara maupun oleh pihak swasta . Dalam pendirian dan operasional sebuah perusahaan dibutuhkan modal termasuk melalui modal ventura. Oleh karena itu keberadaan modal ventura harus didukung oleh pemerintah sebagai regulator dan fasilitator serta masyarakat pelaku bisnis agar modal ventura dapat berkembang lebih baik sehingga bukan hanya perusahaan besar, namun juga perusahaaan kecil dan menengah dapat terbantu oleh pertumbuhan modal ventura. Di lain pihak berhubung penyertaan dana dengan sistem modal ventura ini mengandung risiko tinggi bagi pemodal, maka dari awal pemodal (venture capitalist) harus berhati-hati guna menyelamatkan dana/modal yang dimasukkan ke dalam perusahaan mitra bisnisnya.
HAK KREDITOR DENGAN TAGIHAN PIUTANG TERTOLAK DALAM PROSES PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG Sihabudin Sihabudin; Edo Adhitama
Arena Hukum Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01601.5

Abstract

One of the stages in delaying payment of receivables obligations (PKPU) is the verification of receivables. There may be a possibility that the claim for receivables being rejected at the verification stage may occur, but there is no legal remedy that can be taken by the creditor, either ordinary or extraordinary legal remedies. This article aims to analyze the legal protection of creditors' receivables which are rejected at the receivables verification stage by administrators in the PKPU process and the authority of the supervisory judge in terms of the creditor's bill being rejected at the receivables verification stage. This normative research uses a statutory approach. The results show that Law Number 37 of 2004 does not regulate legal remedies if receivables are rejected in the accounts receivable verification. Efforts are made when this happens, the supervisory judge has the authority to reconcile creditors and debtors in determining. Thus, the debtor does not need to wait for the emergence of a settlement homologation if the bill is rejected in the verification of receivables to submit an appeal to the Supreme Court.