Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal agriTECH Journal of Judicial Review Agroindustrial Journal JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Referendum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Wagiman Wagiman
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Terrorism Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Integrating Pancasila in The Fight Against Modern Threats Muhamad Zarkasih; Sri G M Hatta; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait; Wagiman Wagiman
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i1.767

Abstract

The evolving threat of terrorism in Indonesia has led to the development of counterterrorism laws aimed at combating both domestic and international terrorist activities. Since the Bali bombings in 2002, Indonesia has enacted a series of legal frameworks, such as Law No. 15 of 2003 and its amendments through Law No. 5 of 2018. However, these laws have raised significant concerns about human rights violations, especially regarding the treatment of detainees, preventive detention, and arbitrary arrests. This study adopts a qualitative research methodology, combining doctrinal legal analysis and empirical data gathered from interviews with legal experts, policymakers, and practitioners. It critically examines the compatibility of Indonesia’s counterterrorism laws with international human rights standards, focusing on their implementation, particularly in relation to the fundamental values of Pancasila—the state ideology of Indonesia, which emphasizes social justice, unity, and human dignity. The results highlight several key challenges, such as the need for stronger oversight mechanisms, more effective deradicalization programs, and a comprehensive approach to online radicalization. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating Pancasila principles more thoroughly into counterterrorism strategies, strengthening international cooperation, and ensuring that security measures do not infringe upon individual rights. By addressing these issues, Indonesia can enhance the effectiveness of its counterterrorism efforts while adhering to its commitment to human rights and social justice.
Peningkatan Peran “Konsiliasi” dalam Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia Wagiman Wagiman; Sukh Pawen Jit Kaur
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i3.988

Abstract

Conciliation is one form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that holds great potential for resolving disputes efficiently, participatively, and peacefully outside the courtroom. However, in the Indonesian legal practice, the role of conciliation remains limited and is less popular compared to mediation and arbitration. The main obstacles hindering the development of this mechanism include low public and legal practitioners' awareness, the absence of adequate technical regulations, and the lack of professional conciliation institutions. In fact, conciliation aligns well with Indonesia's legal culture that emphasizes deliberation and consensus. The purpose of this article is to examine the effectiveness of the legal framework for conciliation in Indonesia, identify the barriers to its implementation, and formulate strategies to strengthen conciliation within the national legal system. This study employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and doctrinal approach, complemented by analysis of applicable legislation and legal literature. The findings reveal that conciliation lacks a strong and operational legal framework. The absence of procedural standards, supervisory mechanisms, and training systems for conciliators hampers its effectiveness. On the other hand, conciliation has great potential to reduce the burden on courts, expedite dispute resolution, and preserve good relationships between parties. The article concludes that a comprehensive legal reform is urgently needed, including specific regulations, the establishment of independent conciliation institutions, and public education, so that conciliation can play a strategic role in the national dispute resolution system.
Kewenangan Peradilan Adat di Papua Dalam Menyelsaikan Sengketa Tanah Adat Suku Wate Nazareth Vicky Ferki Rumainum; Wagiman Wagiman
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 8, No 1 (2025): JURNAL STAATRECHTS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v8i1.8205

Abstract

Peradilan adat di Papua mempunyai kewenangan bagi penyelesaian tanah adat, khususnya pada suku Wate. Putusan peradilan adat mengutamakan musyawarah dan mufakat yang melibatkan kepala suku serta tokoh adat. Meskipun memiliki kekuatan dalam komunitas adat, putusan peradilan adat tetap harus selaras dengan hukum nasional yang berlaku di Indonesia. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu:  Bagaimana mengimplementasikan kewenangan peradilan adat di Papua dalam menyelesaiakan sengketa adat suku Wate? Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, peneliti menggunakan data sekunder dengan merujuk pada bahan-bahan hukum primer, terutama Perdasus Papua No. 20 Tahun 2008. Masyarakat hukum adat Papua, Suku Wate memiliki mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang diwariskan melalui musyawarah adat yang mengutamakan mufakat. Perdasus Papua No. 20 Tahun 2008 tentang Peradilan Adat di Papua memberikan dasar hukum kuat bagi peradilan adat dalam menangani sengketa.  Putusan peradilan adat bersifat mengikat dan lebih berorientasi pada pemulihan, seperti denda adat dan upacara adat, dibanding dgn hukum sistem peradilan negara.
Co-Authors A.M. Madyana Adi Kusuma Elza Syarief, Elza Firda Safira Yulianti Guntarti Tatik Mulyati Lindasari Novianti Moh Wahyudin Muhamad Zarkasih Nazareth Vicky Ferki Rumainum Raja Syaiful Anwar Ratu Intan Putri Rendra Topan Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah Sri G M Hatta Suharyati Suharyati Sukh Pawen Jit Kaur Surya Rizal Timbo Mangaranap Sirait Yovita Yovita