Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi Turast: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian AL MUNIR : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam EL-AFKAR : Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis Hadharah: Jurnal Keislaman dan Peradaban Jurnal Sains Student Research International Journal of Islamic Khazanah
Sarwan, Sarwan
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Distingsi Hadis Bid’ah Perspektif Muhammadiyah dan Wahabi-Salafi Sarwan Sarwan; Muhammad Sabri
El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Januari-Juni
Publisher : IAIN Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/jpkth.v12i1.7535

Abstract

Muhammadiyah and Wahabi groups are revivalist Islamic movements, which in their struggle are both against heresy, so that their similarities make them look the same, some even say that Muhammadiyah is part of Wahhabism. then what is the difference in understanding heresy in the view of Muhammadiyah and Wahhabis. The methodology used in this research is Qualitative (Library research). Literature research that uses a comparative approach. By collecting all the materials for books, journals, reference papers related to the understanding of Muhammadiyah and Wahhabism about the heretical hadith. Then the data is reviewed, criticized, analyzed critically and comparatively, then a conclusion is drawn. As for the findings; First, in Muhammadiyah's understanding of the hadith, bid'ah is divided into two, namely hasanah bid'ah and dhalalah bid'ah, while according to Wahhabis all bid'ah is dhalalah. Second, Wahhabis consider relying on dhaif hadith as a heretical heresy, while Muhammadiyah allows apologies to motivate worship. Third, regarding tawassul, Wahhabis do not justify tawassul to pious people, whether living or dead, in contrast to Muhammadiyah which allows tawassul to pious people who are still alive, and not to the dead.
Program Kursus Calon Pengantin (Suscatin) Sebagai Bentuk Dakwah Dan Pemberdayaan Terhadap Catin Dalam Membentuk Keluarga Sakinah Di Kua Kecamatan Koto Tangah Kota Padang Heriadi; Ulfatmi; Sarwan
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Oktober: Jurnal Sains Student Research
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v1i1.83

Abstract

Abstract. This research seeks to systematically reveal and describe in a factual and actual manner the implementation of bridal development at the Koto Tangah District Religious Affairs Office, Padang City. This type of research is descriptive field research. Data collection techniques using interviews, observation (observation). Documentation. The research results show that the implementation of Suscatin means that every catin must follow the SOP that has been determined, including registering online. Visit the SIMKAH website https://simkah4.kemenag.go.id, by completing all the necessary requirements. The Suscatin program is carried out individually if there is a small amount of catin and group coaching if there is a large number of catin couples. Catin coaching material relates to domestic life, marriage laws, the wisdom of marriage, the rights and obligations of husband and wife, how to form a harmonious family, and how to maintain the integrity of the household to avoid divorce. The catin coaching method is a direct method, namely lecture, discussion and demonstration methods. The supporting factors for catin are the enthusiasm of the catin participants, the catin mentor who is quite competent, the delivery method is quite simple, while the inhibiting factors in catin coaching are the place of residence of the prospective bride and groom, the limited insight of the guidance participants, the lack of discipline of the participants, limited time, and limited facilities and infrastructure.
Practice Acceptance and Label Rejection: Social Ambivalence toward Islam Nusantara in Minangkabau, Indonesia Andri Ashadi; Wakidul Kohar; Sefriyono Sefriyono; Sarwan Sarwan; Danil Folandra
International Journal of Islamic Khazanah Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): IJIK
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijik.v16i1.51443

Abstract

This study examines the ambivalent reception of Islam Nusantara in Minangkabau, West Sumatra, where local Islamic practices associated with cultural accommodation remain socially accepted, while the label Islam Nusantara is strongly contested. The study is important because it addresses a paradox in Minangkabau religious life: practices such as maulid, badikia, grave pilgrimages, communal recitations, malamang, and post-death rituals are embedded in local Islamic traditions, yet become suspicious when explicitly associated with Islam Nusantara. Using a qualitative approach, this research draws on semi-structured interviews with 16 informants, including ulama, Nahdlatul Ulama leaders and activists, ninik mamak, and community members in Padang Pariaman and Pasaman Barat. The study also analyzes online news reports, institutional statements, and public discourse materials published between 2018 and 2022. Data were examined through thematic analysis using Jan Hajda’s theory of ambivalence. The findings show three main patterns: first, the coexistence of practice acceptance and label rejection; second, the role of ABS–SBK as a contested interpretive field rather than a fixed philosophy of Islam and adat; and third, the production of threat narratives through institutional authority, elite framing, digital circulation, and trusted informal networks. This study contributes to the literature on Islam Nusantara, local Islam, and religious authority by showing that resistance to a religious discourse may emerge not from the substance of practice, but from the stigma, authority, and symbolic burden attached to its label.
Co-Authors Altavia, Romi Ashadi, Andri Bukhari Bukhari danil folandra Denni Franata Dewi Febriani Eviar Wist Fernando Yudistira Fitri Ayu Lestari Fitriani Ayu Lestari Fitriani Ayu Lestari Habil Hidayatul Rasyad Heriadi luthfi yuhesdi Mardan Mahmuda Masrial Masrial Muhammad Damanik Muhammad Sabri Mulyanti Syas Nurharisyah Hasibuan Prima Kurinati Hamzah Sabiruddin Sabiruddin Sabiruddin, Sabiruddin Sefriyono, Sefriyono Ulfatmi usman usman Vina Melyani Wahyu Wiratul Wakidul Kohar Yulpia Winingsih Yummil Yummil Zainal Zainal Zulvianti, Nora