Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.907
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam El-HARAKAH : Jurnal Budaya Islam Paramita: Historical Studies Journal KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE Jurnal Kawistara : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial dan Humaniora WALISONGO ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jurnal Populasi Episteme: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Jurnal Perempuan Jurnal Penelitian Politik Jurnal Konstitusi Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Jurnal Perempuan Patrawidya: Seri Penerbitan Penelitian Sejarah dan Budaya Aspirasi : Jurnal Masalah-masalah Sosial BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Jurnal Politik Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Pancasila Jurnal Internasional Berbahasa Indonesia (BTI) Studia Islamika
Wasisto Raharjo Jati
Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) Jakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Politik

 1 
Power-Sharing as The Key of Secessionist Conflict Resolution in Developing Democratic Countries Jati, Wasisto Raharjo
Jurnal Politik Vol. 7, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article explains how power-sharing could determine conflict resolution in develo¬ping states, particularly in developing countries. This scheme offers a win-win solution between state actors and the separatist movements to curb conflict and initiate pe¬ace-building at the grassroots level. Using a quantitative analysis that employed data¬sets from Power-Sharing Event Dataset (PSED) and Implementation of Pacts Dataset (IMPACT), this article notably reveals two important findings. First, the most promising power-sharing schemes are territorial and political power-sharing. Furthermore, the preliminary talk about ideal power-sharing consensus between the state actors and rebel groups is important to determine the outcome of power-sharing policies. Finally, this article concludes that the state capacity shows the final conflict resolution. Strong states can manage ethnic conflict, while weak state capacity could exacerbate the ethnic conflict.
Managing Ethno-Nationalism within Special Territorial Autonomy Policy: Comparative Cases between Aceh and Papua Jati, Wasisto Raharjo
Jurnal Politik Vol. 9, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of special autonomy regions is how the central government acknowledges the uniqueness and significant contributions of specific regions to Indonesia. The acknowledgment is then accommodated within special autonomy policies. Starting with Papua in 2001, there are eight provinces with special regions. Despite having a special autonomy status, those provinces may have more problems. The issues are mainly the historical root of integration with Indonesia, resource inequality, and the genuine representations of indigenous people as officeholders. These three issues have been common problems in Indonesia since the up-and-down relationship exists between the central government and those special autonomous regions. The unequal compensation in revenue transfer always becomes a hotbed that recalls the integration process with Indonesia long ago. In line with the previously mentioned problems, this paper aims to evaluate the policy performance of special autonomy policies in Aceh and Papua. Both regions are worth investigating because there are always disputed classical problems that disrupt national integrity. Most importantly, both regions have insurgency movements that force the central government to respond swiftly. Compared with other special autonomous regions, Aceh and Papua have been in a turbulent position with Jakarta for many decades. These fluctuating relationships show unresolved problems that are still ingrained in both regions. Following up on the mentioned problems briefly, this paper reveals that while special autonomy in Aceh technically has ended the long conflict, Papua still struggles with scattered conflict in some regions. These different results show the remaining challenges the special autonomy policy should deal with very soon.
Kelas Menengah dalam Bingkai Middle Indonesia Jati, Wasisto Raharjo
Jurnal Politik Vol. 1, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Co-Authors Gonibala, Rukmana Halimatusa'diah, Halimatusa'diah Hendri Gunawan Kirwan Misbahul Wani Rahmiati, Dini Rusli, Almunauwar Syamsurijal Syamsurijal, Syamsurijal Yilmaz, Ihsan Zahir, Lalu Niqman